Cam Only C5z vs Whipple Cobra |
thats a poor running cobra |
Originally Posted by PaSteLaSo4U
(Post 17640770)
thats a poor running cobra |
You didn't even need nitrous to take him. lol great kill |
Originally Posted by Mr.Lsx
(Post 17640782)
I think its right on par! My car traps 126 on motor! 580 cobra trap anywhere from 126-131depending on weather! how are you trapping 126 with 420 wheel? Did you do some weight reduction? |
Originally Posted by 38394Z28
(Post 17640816)
Nice runs. You just edged him out on the bottle lol how are you trapping 126 with 420 wheel? Did you do some weight reduction? Low reading dyno! Ive seen intake and full exhaust zs trap 120 its not unheard of |
Seems very odd that a 580 rwhp car can't beat a 420 rwhp car...even with the weight difference |
Thats was nasty with spray. Like to see you run the 5.0 again with the spray. |
Originally Posted by HCI2000SS
(Post 17640830)
Seems very odd that a 580 rwhp car can't beat a 420 rwhp car...even with the weight difference |
Originally Posted by ohioborn80
(Post 17640833)
Thats was nasty with spray. Like to see you run the 5.0 again with the spray. |
Good runs.... i love weight reduction!! |
Originally Posted by Mr.Lsx
(Post 17640819)
Edge him out on the bottle lol the second pull was motor! Low reading dyno! Ive seen intake and full exhaust zs trap 120 its not unheard of I mean...stock C6Z's trap low 120's and they make 440ish with a better curve. Whatever you're doing is working that's for sure...if its really a cam only stock weight car its one of the fastest I've heard of. |
Oh i'm not doubting you at all! You obviously know how to drive, and have a great running car! Nice job |
Originally Posted by Mr.Lsx
(Post 17640782)
I think its right on par! My car traps 126 on motor! 580 cobra trap anywhere from 126-131depending on weather! |
Convertible is a good bit heavier... and we dont know its build. Could be heavier then stock. My buddies vert 03 whipple car was 3850 before he even got in it. |
Vettes are slow... |
Thats because vettes are too heavy... |
Originally Posted by evangto87
(Post 17640853)
Good runs.... i love weight reduction!!
Originally Posted by 38394Z28
(Post 17640855)
Atco then? I mean...stock C6Z's trap low 120's and they make 440ish with a better curve. Whatever you're doing is working that's for sure...if its really a cam only stock weight car its one of the fastest I've heard of.
Originally Posted by HCI2000SS
(Post 17640861)
Oh i'm not doubting you at all! You obviously know how to drive, and have a great running car! Nice job
Originally Posted by ctgreddy
(Post 17640870)
That doesn't seem right considering my 460whp cobra trapped 122-123, I'd be pissed if I whippled my car and didnt consistently trap over 130. Your car deff moves out for what it is for damn sure tho. :guns:
Originally Posted by ohioborn80
(Post 17640926)
Vettes are slow... |
I wasnt saying your car had weight reduction... I was just saying i love it and this is why i spend thousands to get my car lighter lol. Other people just like to add HP. Im all about the weight. Hell my GTO was 3300lbs lol |
Originally Posted by evangto87
(Post 17640946)
I wasnt saying your car had weight reduction... I was just saying i love it and this is why i spend thousands to get my car lighter lol. Other people just like to add HP. Im all about the weight. Hell my GTO was 3300lbs lol |
Originally Posted by evangto87
(Post 17640874)
Convertible is a good bit heavier... and we dont know its build. Could be heavier then stock. My buddies vert 03 whipple car was 3850 before he even got in it. |
Originally Posted by ctgreddy
(Post 17640981)
good point, i forgot how heavy a stock irs vert cobra would be. |
really? man that's even worse for him then. I saw the car in the picture of your car at the gas station and just assumed it was the car you were racing lol |
Originally Posted by ctgreddy
(Post 17641029)
really? man that's even worse for him then. I saw the car in the picture of your car at the gas station and just assumed it was the car you were racing lol |
Lmao i love the reactions that OP's vids get on here, its priceless. |
Originally Posted by Mr.Lsx
(Post 17641049)
Sonic blue and white lol how do you mistake that I know its dark but you would know a white car from a dark one even at night |
Good kill. Just shows that there are good running card and not so good running cars. Keep up the good work! |
That's one helluva cam to trap 126 N/A. |
Another great kill mr lsx , keep up the good work |
its always funny to see so many 'he cud have' it shud have' comments. video doesnt lie. |
Originally Posted by SAPS
(Post 17642113)
That's one helluva cam to trap 126 N/A.
Originally Posted by Knight-Z06
(Post 17642229)
Another great kill mr lsx , keep up the good work
Originally Posted by JDEP162
(Post 17642230)
its always funny to see so many 'he cud have' it shud have' comments. video doesnt lie. |
Originally Posted by SAPS
(Post 17642113)
That's one helluva cam to trap 126 N/A. Good kill! |
Originally Posted by HioSSilver
(Post 17642297)
Not really. ..... no cam needed for that. Good kill! |
Originally Posted by V8EATR
(Post 17642320)
You should make a list of stock weight stock engine c5z's that trap 126. He'll even cam only ones. Should be a giant list, need moar bandwidth. |
Originally Posted by HioSSilver
(Post 17642380)
Not my problem what others can out can't do. ....... I'm telling you what can be done. Solid full bolt on cammed ones should go well over 130. If my bolt on ls6 camaro can go over 130 No reason a ls6 vette shouldn't at least get close |
Originally Posted by 38394Z28
(Post 17640855)
Atco then? I mean...stock C6Z's trap low 120's and they make 440ish with a better curve. Whatever you're doing is working that's for sure...if its really a cam only stock weight car its one of the fastest I've heard of. |
Originally Posted by ctgreddy
(Post 17640870)
That doesn't seem right considering my 460whp cobra trapped 122-123, I'd be pissed if I whippled my car and didnt consistently trap over 130. Your car deff moves out for what it is for damn sure tho. :guns: Mine runs consistently at 128 mph, it has hit 129 once or twice :bang: |
Originally Posted by sweet99ss
(Post 17642625)
His car def runs good for cam and bolt-ons, but bolt-on only c5 z06's have went 126 in the 1/4 mile. Some cars just run really good. Also did we see how big of a cam it is? I hope to trap around 122 cam only... |
Originally Posted by V8EATR
(Post 17642481)
It's comical sometimes. Not saying it can't be done but not everyone has a $3,000 super light weight clutch with a face plated transmission and a race weight 500lbs lighter than stock. That stuff is probably worth a couple mph don't ya think? The clutch is no where near that. No more than some spend a any other aftermarket clutch. 500lb lighter.....I wish......faceplated t56.....dunno what it's worth. Depends on how you use it. In the end a c5Z06 is the better car and has more potential. |
Originally Posted by HioSSilver
(Post 17642924)
Exaggerate much? The clutch is no where near that. No more than some spend a any other aftermarket clutch. 500lb lighter.....I wish......faceplated t56.....dunno what it's worth. Depends on how you use it. In the end a c5Z06 is the better car and has more potential. |
There are lots of things that can affect performance. Your over looking the fact that the z06 chassis is that much better. Just being able to launch the damn thing instead of pussy footing out of the hole like I do would be worth time/mph. IDK how much either is worth on a back to back test. If you use the clutch then the fp'd t56 is worth nothing....if you don't then I'm sure it's worth a little something. But not what it could be with a ignition cut. The clutch I don't see being worth any more than .2.....at the most. My weight is similar to a stock z06. Those would be the facts as close as I can guess. But w/o doin back to back tests we will never know. |
your car moved OUT! nice vid! always nice to see some GM pulling Ford (not trying to start a thread war, i just like GM better and obviously since im on this site i root for GM) |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:46 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands