Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

Stock 02 Z28 vs Modded 2v

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-23-2013, 04:51 PM
  #121  
On The Tree
 
Heater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wilmywood NC
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ZFreie
I dunno why you guys waste your time with autofail


They love arguing with him.
Heater is offline  
Old 09-23-2013, 05:00 PM
  #122  
TECH Enthusiast
 
ZFreie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Heater
They love arguing with him.
I could understand this if auto HAD an argument, but most of the time he just repeats the same thing over and over. He's been posting that same 2v for over a year to get back at us.

~edit~ in before auto says "false"
ZFreie is offline  
Old 09-23-2013, 05:02 PM
  #123  
Banned
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TitanTransAm
No ****.
So you admit to being wrong?
automach1 is offline  
Old 09-23-2013, 05:11 PM
  #124  
On The Tree
 
Heater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Wilmywood NC
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by automach1
So you admit to being wrong?


I don't know who is more troll, him or you. If you can prove the GT 500 is yours, then he will be the bigger troll by default.
Heater is offline  
Old 09-23-2013, 05:13 PM
  #125  
Teching In
 
SCalla1384's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by automach1
4v> ls = 2v> lt1=3v


A. Yes they are slow as **** because most of the owners are derps. So what's your point?
Sorry man, even though I'm a ford guy. The ls1 is a much better motor and platform then the C head 4v.

The C head 4v is actually a good motor. But, price per horsepower... ls1 runs away with it. Considering the Mach 1 needs 4 cams and the ls1 needs 1.
Also, I'm sure porting heads on LS heads are cheaper and easier to assemble then 4v heads.
Intake manifold, there's not much going on for the 4v. The best option is to cut the stocker in half and re-weld it. Which has been proven the best gain. That's not cheap, last time I looked it was about $1100.
I'm not sure how much LS intakes go for.

Also, 2Vs aren't slow because the owners are dumb. There just slow unless they have boost thrown at them. It's really that simple.
SCalla1384 is offline  
Old 09-23-2013, 05:17 PM
  #126  
Banned
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ZFreie
I could understand this if auto HAD an argument, but most of the time he just repeats the same thing over and over. He's been posting that same 2v for over a year to get back at us.

~edit~ in before auto says "false"
I could post a different 9 sec n/a 2v if you would like
automach1 is offline  
Old 09-23-2013, 05:21 PM
  #127  
Banned
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SCalla1384
Sorry man, even though I'm a ford guy. The ls1 is a much better motor and platform then the C head 4v.

The C head 4v is actually a good motor. But, price per horsepower... ls1 runs away with it. Considering the Mach 1 needs 4 cams and the ls1 needs 1.
Also, I'm sure porting heads on LS heads are cheaper and easier to assemble then 4v heads.
Intake manifold, there's not much going on for the 4v. The best option is to cut the stocker in half and re-weld it. Which has been proven the best gain. That's not cheap, last time I looked it was about $1100.
I'm not sure how much LS intakes go for.

Also, 2Vs aren't slow because the owners are dumb. There just slow unless they have boost thrown at them. It's really that simple.
If ls is so great then why is it so much slower then the fastest 4.6 4v?
automach1 is offline  
Old 09-23-2013, 05:22 PM
  #128  
Banned
 
automach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South MS
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Heater
I don't know who is more troll, him or you. If you can prove the GT 500 is yours, then he will be the bigger troll by default.
Already did so I guess I win.
automach1 is offline  
Old 09-23-2013, 05:30 PM
  #129  
Banned
 
TitanTransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Omaha
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Heater
I don't know who is more troll, him or you. If you can prove the GT 500 is yours, then he will be the bigger troll by default.
You're the one who makes troll threads, hotstuff. Oh the irony.
TitanTransAm is offline  
Old 09-23-2013, 05:32 PM
  #130  
Banned
 
TitanTransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Omaha
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by automach1
If ls is so great then why is it so much slower then the fastest 4.6 4v?
Why is your blown 5.4 with bolt ons slower than a NA LS1 with bolt ons?
TitanTransAm is offline  
Old 09-23-2013, 05:53 PM
  #131  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Bengi09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Amarillo, Texas
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=automach1;


B. I was just saying I would love to see him run a local car with the same mods he listed except he is not full boltons. Can't help that everybody gets butthurt over a race that will probably never happen [/QUOTE]

Ok so how is it that another 2v with the same mods as the one I raced will have a different outcome, sure there could be a better driver that may make it a little closer. The only difference that should be seen is the driver. This holds no water that a 2v would win
Bengi09 is offline  
Old 09-23-2013, 06:05 PM
  #132  
Banned
 
TitanTransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Omaha
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

http://www.streetfire.net/video/first-8-second-na-ls1_12076.htm
^8 second N/A LS1 that traps 150+ mph. Your 2v ain't ****, autotoolbox.
TitanTransAm is offline  
Old 09-23-2013, 06:12 PM
  #133  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
MN_V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: MN
Posts: 1,107
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

I ran a 98GT with an 04 GT engine (260hp) with headers and exhaust and I put 3 car lengths on it from a 15-75 roll, the thing did not have much torque and took forever to spin up. From a 40 roll it was a little better but I still put a half car on it to 100. Again that was in my 06 Altima 3.5 5MT.
MN_V is offline  
Old 09-23-2013, 06:21 PM
  #134  
Banned
 
TitanTransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Omaha
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MN_V
I ran a 98GT with an 04 GT engine (260hp) with headers and exhaust and I put 3 car lengths on it from a 15-75 roll, the thing did not have much torque and took forever to spin up. From a 40 roll it was a little better but I still put a half car on it to 100. Again that was in my 06 Altima 3.5 5MT.
LOL at first I figured you were talking about racing them with an LS1...then I read Altima 3.5 and literally laughed out loud.

My light bolt on 99 Z28 puts bus lengths on 2V's with similar mods. From any speed. They are sorry as ****.
TitanTransAm is offline  
Old 09-23-2013, 06:22 PM
  #135  
Teching In
 
SCalla1384's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by automach1
If ls is so great then why is it so much slower then the fastest 4.6 4v?
I'm not saying its so great. But it's better then a c head 4v.

Your on a LS forum. What do you expect? People to agree with you?
SCalla1384 is offline  
Old 09-23-2013, 06:35 PM
  #136  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
JC316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 375
Received 85 Likes on 63 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by automach1
There is more then one 5.4 4v that has made over 600 to the wheels. A stock cube ls1 has yet to accomplish that. Don't even start with the ls1 hasn't been pushed n/a bs as we all know it has. I am not comparing it to a streetable 5.7 ls. I am comparing it to any n/a 5.7 ls. So again your argument is weak and you have been proven wrong yet again.
Show me a 600RWP NA 5.4L.
JC316 is offline  
Old 09-23-2013, 06:41 PM
  #137  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
OneSlowV's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: East Texas
Posts: 406
Received 218 Likes on 136 Posts
Default

Man that's all we hear out of automach. The 4.6 4v is the fastest lmao. Go trade in your slow pos GT500 for a 4.6 then you could maybe run better than 12s.
OneSlowV is offline  
Old 09-23-2013, 06:42 PM
  #138  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (12)
 
OVA1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MN_V
I ran a 98GT with an 04 GT engine (260hp) with headers and exhaust and I put 3 car lengths on it from a 15-75 roll, the thing did not have much torque and took forever to spin up. From a 40 roll it was a little better but I still put a half car on it to 100. Again that was in my 06 Altima 3.5 5MT.
ROFLMNAO!

That was COLD…
OVA1 is offline  
Old 09-23-2013, 06:55 PM
  #139  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,944
Received 439 Likes on 345 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by OneSlowV
Man that's all we hear out of automach. The 4.6 4v is the fastest lmao. Go trade in your slow pos GT500 for a 4.6 then you could maybe run better than 12s.
He tried that already....couldn't even get it to run.....posted nothing of his results and tries to avoid the subject. I think he sold it to someone that might get it to go.
HioSSilver is offline  
Old 09-23-2013, 06:57 PM
  #140  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
OneSlowV's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: East Texas
Posts: 406
Received 218 Likes on 136 Posts
Default

Lol damn that sucks.
OneSlowV is offline  


Quick Reply: Stock 02 Z28 vs Modded 2v



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:25 PM.