2012 CTS-V(in car) vs 2004 CTS-V LS6(bolt ons)
03-30-2015, 08:03 AM
#2
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
50 roll. I have fast 92, 1 3/4 pacesetter headers, ls7 clutch. 391 whp/378 lb ft and weigh 3750 lbs.
.....yes i have a tune. Made 377/369 before tune.
.....yes i have a tune. Made 377/369 before tune.
Last edited by 4PointSlow; 03-30-2015 at 08:08 AM.
03-30-2015, 08:48 AM
#5
On The Tree
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Utah
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Good death OP, did the other driver not know how to race? Just wondering because he had to be told twice to go lol. I hate racing with noobs that don't know wtf they're doing.
Trending Topics
03-30-2015, 09:45 AM
#9
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: heading South East on Bakalakadaka street
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
And the V2 guys say we V1 guys need h\c\nitrous\full bolt ons to MAYBE stand a chance against a stock one. L-O-L
Good kill OP. I didn't expect as hard of a pull, but not really surprised a bolt on V1 beat a V2. 50 roll from 2nd it sounded like?
Is this on Fb yet? Has **** hit the fan yet?
Good kill OP. I didn't expect as hard of a pull, but not really surprised a bolt on V1 beat a V2. 50 roll from 2nd it sounded like?
Is this on Fb yet? Has **** hit the fan yet?
03-30-2015, 10:57 AM
#12
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: heading South East on Bakalakadaka street
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
They do average that. And a stock V1 averages about 109 or so. The issue is that V1s can't ****** 60 to save their lives without some attention to suspension and tire. If V1s could 60 under 2.0 like V2s can thanks to the lesson GM learned in the V1 suspension, they'd trap and ET harder. I know I've lost a few mph just with hopping on the 1-2 shift alone.
Last edited by odthetruth; 03-30-2015 at 11:33 AM.
03-30-2015, 10:59 AM
#14
They do average that. And a stock averages about 109 or so. The issue is that V1s can't ****** 60 to save their lives without some attention to suspension and tire. If V1s could 60 under 2.0 like V2s can thanks to the lesson GM learned in the V1 suspension, they'd trap and ET harder. I know I've lost a few mph just with hopping on the 1-2 shift alone.
03-30-2015, 11:51 AM
#17
ASSuming On The Tree
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Kind of like the Hellcat, which apparently beats cars that trap 10mph faster than it.
03-30-2015, 04:52 PM
#20
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yeah i spin every shift at the track. In 2000 da I did 12.8 at 112-113 with a bad 2.2.... Tulsa up north is 1000 feet lower elevation and the da can get between -300 and 300 when its cool out. I can see a 115-116 trap there. Friend's bone stock 5.0 did 11.9 at 116 on drag radials there, no tune, his 5.0 weighs the same and made less power stock. bench racing ftw