Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

2015 392 challenger vs 5.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-08-2015, 08:14 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
abenitez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking 2015 392 challenger vs 5.0

Old 09-08-2015, 08:26 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
HCI2000SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

What are the mods exactly on both cars?
Old 09-08-2015, 08:40 PM
  #3  
Teching In
 
SRTboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Bay Area CA
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default 2015 392 challenger vs 5.0

Nice runs. I really wish I could convince myself a 2015 scatpak was a good decision. Beautiful car.
Old 09-08-2015, 08:49 PM
  #4  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
abenitez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The 392 is straight pipesd
5.0
Is cobra jet e85 cold air mono throttle body and cat deletes and exhaust
Almost a full bolt on car (needs headers lol)
I would of pulled more on the rolls but couldnt drive for **** missed 3rd on both pulls
Old 09-08-2015, 09:01 PM
  #5  
Staging Lane
 
V8EATR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 71
Received 19 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Good runs, makes sense considering the mod difference
Old 09-08-2015, 09:19 PM
  #6  
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
NateLS1Mustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by abenitez
The 392 is straight pipesd
5.0
Is cobra jet e85 cold air mono throttle body and cat deletes and exhaust
Almost a full bolt on car (needs headers lol)
I would of pulled more on the rolls but couldnt drive for **** missed 3rd on both pulls
I might be getting you confused with someone else but I thought you had the single turbo 5.0?
Old 09-08-2015, 09:56 PM
  #7  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
abenitez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NateLS1Mustang
I might be getting you confused with someone else but I thought you had the single turbo 5.0?
Nope it was me lol. I blew my 3rd turbo when the 1320 guys were out here. So I sold the kit and went bolt one for now. Hopefully have a tt set up next year :/
Old 09-08-2015, 11:00 PM
  #8  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
62nalide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 2,192
Received 34 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Damn for being stock that 392 put in work.
I think I found my new Daily
Old 09-08-2015, 11:43 PM
  #9  
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
NateLS1Mustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by abenitez
Nope it was me lol. I blew my 3rd turbo when the 1320 guys were out here. So I sold the kit and went bolt one for now. Hopefully have a tt set up next year :/
Damn, that's no bueno. That's some bad luck. Hope you get back into the world of boost ASAP!
Old 09-09-2015, 03:25 AM
  #10  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
OneSlowV's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: East Texas
Posts: 406
Received 218 Likes on 136 Posts
Default

I see no point in a 6spd 392 . 8spd is were its at for those cars also get a tune on it lol . Good runs !
Old 09-09-2015, 06:05 AM
  #11  
TECH Apprentice
 
CamOnlyJabroni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 321
Received 88 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 62nalide
Damn for being stock that 392 put in work.
I think I found my new Daily
What V said. Get the 8 speed. They are faster plain and simple. They also have MDS. mine got 25mpg on the way home from the dealership. Stock the SRT's/Scat Pack's come with true dual with a x pipe 2 3/4 active exhaust. Basically doing exhaust gains nothing but sound. The shorty headers on the 392 are the same as what's on the hellcat. Exhaust is optimal from the factory. Not that it makes much difference, The SRT's are a little heavier do to more options standard plus the bigger brakes and adjustable suspension. Nice vid btw.

Last edited by CamOnlyJabroni; 09-09-2015 at 06:58 AM.
Old 09-09-2015, 06:35 AM
  #12  
Staging Lane
 
408-99-f's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NewHampshire
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Nice vid, didnt think the mopar did too bad considering. Nice vid as usual
Old 09-09-2015, 09:26 AM
  #13  
11 Second Club
 
Poppacapp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: NC
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Mopars move out decent now. Especially for the pigs they are. The Hellcat is the king of pigs. Fat chicks need love too.
Old 09-09-2015, 09:45 AM
  #14  
10 Second Club
 
big hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: over dere
Posts: 3,428
Received 152 Likes on 104 Posts

Default

Love the 392. It did well!
Old 09-09-2015, 02:18 PM
  #15  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
abenitez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Lol big girls need love to, there's a couple scat packs running around here. I'll try to get another vid
Old 09-09-2015, 05:06 PM
  #16  
TECH Resident
 
SixPak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: dallas,tx.
Posts: 828
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by big hammer
Love the 392. It did well!
It did well?
It LOST every race!
It did well?
It has a 90 cubic inch (think a Harley engine) advantage, it lost every race, and you say it did well?
You are some kind of a Ford-hating-GM-nutt-hugger.........
Name:  UglyTeeth.jpg
Views: 187
Size:  18.5 KB
It did well. LOL!

Last edited by SixPak; 09-09-2015 at 05:21 PM.
Old 09-09-2015, 05:29 PM
  #17  
Teching In
 
Red is Faster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: SW FL
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Everyone around here knows a bolton 5.bro is a 9-10 second car. For a stock challenger to keep up with that, it's really impressive. The challenger did well.
Old 09-09-2015, 08:12 PM
  #18  
11 Second Club
 
TonyGXP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 606
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

like modding a a 20yo civic and it beating anything...... i would still take anything over it.... the SRT is so much nicer in every way. as ugly as the new mustang II is, it just shows you how much more terrible looking the last gen was..........
Old 09-09-2015, 08:55 PM
  #19  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
abenitez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TonyGXP
like modding a a 20yo civic and it beating anything...... i would still take anything over it.... the SRT is so much nicer in every way. as ugly as the new mustang II is, it just shows you how much more terrible looking the last gen was..........
13-14 mustangs are the best looking ones imo by far, the new s550 are ugly as **** lol. I will admit the 14 n up challengers do look a hell of a lot nicer then the stang. But to dam heavy and slow. And a bolt on 5.0 does not run 9-10s lol
Old 09-09-2015, 09:38 PM
  #20  
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
NateLS1Mustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by abenitez
13-14 mustangs are the best looking ones imo by far, the new s550 are ugly as **** lol. I will admit the 14 n up challengers do look a hell of a lot nicer then the stang. But to dam heavy and slow. And a bolt on 5.0 does not run 9-10s lol
It's Stock knows his car is a 9 second bolt on 5.bro. Just ask him. He knows what it'll run before he even runs it.


Quick Reply: 2015 392 challenger vs 5.0



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:03 AM.