Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

Stock 2016 Camaro SS vs Bolt-On 5.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-06-2017, 04:16 AM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
c6ftw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Stock 2016 Camaro SS vs Bolt-On 5.0


Muffler Delete 2016 Camaro ss vs. 2016 Mustang gt w/Pmas Intake, Catback Exhaust, Drag Pack, NT05R's, Lund Tune.

Close runs!
Old 01-06-2017, 05:51 AM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
fst100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: lancaster, pa
Posts: 1,155
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts

Default

nice runs and close race! having a passenger definitely changes the outcome. be interesting with the same cars and drivers/cam guy when the 6th gen has more bolt-on mods. will the 6th gen be even or even pull the 5.0 even with a passenger?
Old 01-06-2017, 07:19 AM
  #3  
Teching In
 
corysmach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Coyote sounded terrible shifting at 4500.
Old 01-06-2017, 08:05 AM
  #4  
Staging Lane
 
V8EATR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 71
Received 19 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Damn good runs.
Old 01-06-2017, 08:17 AM
  #5  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
Fast02Z06's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Clear Lake Tx
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Good runs no doubt and a close race. Br0 for the w
Old 01-06-2017, 09:02 AM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
UltraZLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hanover, Michigan
Posts: 1,264
Received 55 Likes on 40 Posts

Default

Should have had 93 tune only
Old 01-06-2017, 09:05 AM
  #7  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
Fast02Z06's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Clear Lake Tx
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think they were both on 93 according to the description. That was one Hell of a tune on the br0 bc I pulled pretty hard on a 3 mod tune br0 on street tires.
Old 01-06-2017, 09:29 AM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
UltraZLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hanover, Michigan
Posts: 1,264
Received 55 Likes on 40 Posts

Default

Would have went quicker without the drag pack, cat back and proven CAI. They just need 93 tune

Lund is known for flex fuel tune. Could be either. Description just says Lund tune. Which is what they will list most times regardless
Old 01-06-2017, 09:57 AM
  #9  
Banned
 
RedFuryZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Damn. 5 mod br0 still gets pulled by stock 6gen.
Old 01-06-2017, 10:10 AM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (55)
 
Mike Morris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Md/PA/FL
Posts: 1,602
Received 61 Likes on 50 Posts

Default

Good runs
Old 01-06-2017, 10:13 AM
  #11  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
c6ftw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Both are on 91 Octane. Camaro owner had 3 days with his car so he's a bit lazy when it comes to shifting fast, the mustang owner is a bit more experienced. We tried doing different rolls, but gearing is so different it was hard to get a fair start. 30 rolls were low for the 6g and anything higher than that the 5.0 was too high in the rpms or too low in 2nd gear. 6g's redline at like 50mph... Also, the 5.0 took the digs due to the traction advantage. Other than that, it was a pretty close race. We will definitely set up some more digs with these two once the 6g gets stickier tires.
Old 01-06-2017, 10:24 AM
  #12  
Banned
 
RedFuryZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So 5 mod br0 got pulled by a stock 6 gen with crappy driver. Ouchie
Old 01-06-2017, 10:26 AM
  #13  
11 Second Club
 
Poppacapp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: NC
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by UltraZLS1
Would have went quicker without the drag pack, cat back and proven CAI. They just need 93 tune

Lund is known for flex fuel tune. Could be either. Description just says Lund tune. Which is what they will list most times regardless
Oh he butthurt... fo sho
Old 01-06-2017, 10:30 AM
  #14  
7 Second Club
 
islander033's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Crossfield, AB
Posts: 239
Received 313 Likes on 242 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by c6ftw
Both are on 91 Octane. Camaro owner had 3 days with his car so he's a bit lazy when it comes to shifting fast, the mustang owner is a bit more experienced. We tried doing different rolls, but gearing is so different it was hard to get a fair start. 30 rolls were low for the 6g and anything higher than that the 5.0 was too high in the rpms or too low in 2nd gear. 6g's redline at like 50mph... Also, the 5.0 took the digs due to the traction advantage. Other than that, it was a pretty close race. We will definitely set up some more digs with these two once the 6g gets stickier tires.
Good vid and pulls.

The sis gen really does have aggressive gearing, gives it some nice artificial TQ....but it just wasn't enough to get the W in the vid.
Old 01-06-2017, 10:54 AM
  #15  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
navyblueSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Jonesboro, LA
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Modded bro can't pull away from a stock 6th gen once again. Imagine that.
Old 01-06-2017, 11:03 AM
  #16  
11 Second Club
 
Poppacapp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: NC
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by navyblueSS
Modded bro can't pull away from a stock 6th gen once again. Imagine that.
Hmm.. I have no issues.....
Old 01-06-2017, 11:06 AM
  #17  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
navyblueSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Jonesboro, LA
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Poppacapp
Hmm.. I have no issues.....
Yeah and the cars at your track run 12.5s according to you lol.
Old 01-06-2017, 11:06 AM
  #18  
Banned
 
RedFuryZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Poppacapp
Hmm.. I have no issues.....
Um yes you do.
Old 01-06-2017, 11:14 AM
  #19  
TECH Regular
 
Dimeomboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Emory Texas currently
Posts: 484
Received 18 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by navyblueSS
Yeah and the cars at your track run 12.5s according to you lol.
we go to the same track he's not lying call it driver error or whatever u want but what a car runs greatly depends on the driver and there's two chargers at this track that make the camaros stop lining up against them again driver error or whatever but the times they run are what they are some tracks have great running 6gen our track does not
Old 01-06-2017, 11:16 AM
  #20  
TECH Regular
 
Dimeomboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Emory Texas currently
Posts: 484
Received 18 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RedFuryZ28
Um yes you do.
I've seen it. Funny how everyone doubts Pappas car till they see it in person or line up next to it. If your car runs what u say it does and u can beat all these cars on here like u say every other post why not prove it


Quick Reply: Stock 2016 Camaro SS vs Bolt-On 5.0



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:45 AM.