Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

This doesn't seem right??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-21-2017, 01:13 PM
  #21  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
kinglt-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft. Wayne, IN
Posts: 5,794
Received 196 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Nick.H
I thought they got faster after 2014. Aren't the 2015+ ones doing low 13's high 12's?
Not the 5.7...The Scat Pack 6.4 is a entirely different animal.
Old 02-21-2017, 01:26 PM
  #22  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
Nick.H's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Dirty D, CA
Posts: 134
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Got it^^ I'm not familiar with dodge products I wasn't sure which was their fast model. I know SRT is supposed to be the best but I wasn't sure what engine came in the RT's
Old 02-21-2017, 03:47 PM
  #23  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
JC316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 367
Received 78 Likes on 57 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RedFuryZ28
[url]https://youtu.be/wR7F-pKkjqc[/ul]
Dyno numbers can be manipulated and quite honestly that looks like a shady *** shop. Might be legit, might not. You're also comparing an M6 car to an auto, the 6 speed hemi puts down right at 350RWP. Any way you slice it, the 2014+ hemi puts down about 20-30RWP more than the LS1.

The weight is the factor on these cars. I have a 5.3L Silverado and a 5.7L Ram right now, it's no contest, the hemi will suck the doors off the silverado.
Old 02-21-2017, 04:08 PM
  #24  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
kinglt-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft. Wayne, IN
Posts: 5,794
Received 196 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Nick.H
Got it^^ I'm not familiar with dodge products I wasn't sure which was their fast model. I know SRT is supposed to be the best but I wasn't sure what engine came in the RT's
Only difference between SRT and Scat Pack is bigger brakes and some appearance enhancements. Scat Pack is the best value Dodge offers. The heads on the 6.4 flow 360cfm stock.
Old 02-21-2017, 04:22 PM
  #25  
Banned
 
RedFuryZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JC316
Dyno numbers can be manipulated and quite honestly that looks like a shady *** shop. Might be legit, might not. You're also comparing an M6 car to an auto, the 6 speed hemi puts down right at 350RWP. Any way you slice it, the 2014+ hemi puts down about 20-30RWP more than the LS1.

The weight is the factor on these cars. I have a 5.3L Silverado and a 5.7L Ram right now, it's no contest, the hemi will suck the doors off the silverado.
350rwhp is pretty much bone stock ls1 power, with Furd logic. Headers and tune probably gets a lot of them there.
Old 02-21-2017, 04:50 PM
  #26  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
JC316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 367
Received 78 Likes on 57 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RedFuryZ28
350rwhp is pretty much bone stock ls1 power, with Furd logic. Headers and tune probably gets a lot of them there.

There is no shame in it man, the hemi is just the better motor stock. Considering it's a newer motor, it's expected.
Old 02-21-2017, 07:29 PM
  #27  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
kinglt-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft. Wayne, IN
Posts: 5,794
Received 196 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

LS1 is definitely not 350whp stock...More like 300-320whp.
Old 02-21-2017, 07:47 PM
  #28  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Packy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Surf City, NC
Posts: 1,151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Nick.H
And I wouldn't exactly call a Drag pack and shift kit car a "bolt on" car
Well it better be declared in the signature line... Wheels/tires
Old 02-21-2017, 07:51 PM
  #29  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
 
Nick.H's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Dirty D, CA
Posts: 134
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kinglt-1
LS1 is definitely not 350whp stock...More like 300-320whp.
Lmao if they make 350 stock then my intake, exhaust, cam & tune only gave me 20whp before my motor gave up
Old 02-22-2017, 07:23 AM
  #30  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,927
Received 412 Likes on 330 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JC316
Dyno numbers can be manipulated and quite honestly that looks like a shady *** shop. Might be legit, might not. You're also comparing an M6 car to an auto, the 6 speed hemi puts down right at 350RWP. Any way you slice it, the 2014+ hemi puts down about 20-30RWP more than the LS1.

The weight is the factor on these cars. I have a 5.3L Silverado and a 5.7L Ram right now, it's no contest, the hemi will suck the doors off the silverado.
Idk about that last sentence. I have gave it to several hemis. My truck is a 2500hd with the 6.0.....I've ran 1/2 tons to. A 5.7 hemi in a 2500 like mine gets demolished. My uncles 5.3 whooped up on my neighbors 5.7 hemi too, both rcsb. And similar years.

My guess is you can't drive. Punch the tow haul button and manually shift the 5.3 or 6.0 at 6k rpm and watch it go.
Old 02-22-2017, 07:46 AM
  #31  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
kinglt-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft. Wayne, IN
Posts: 5,794
Received 196 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Nick.H
Lmao if they make 350 stock then my intake, exhaust, cam & tune only gave me 20whp before my motor gave up
Yea and 320 was the SLP 01-02 M6 cars with LS6 intake and better flowing exhaust. I would say 300 is a good average.
Old 02-22-2017, 07:48 AM
  #32  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
kinglt-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft. Wayne, IN
Posts: 5,794
Received 196 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
Idk about that last sentence. I have gave it to several hemis. My truck is a 2500hd with the 6.0.....I've ran 1/2 tons to. A 5.7 hemi in a 2500 like mine gets demolished. My uncles 5.3 whooped up on my neighbors 5.7 hemi too, both rcsb. And similar years.

My guess is you can't drive. Punch the tow haul button and manually shift the 5.3 or 6.0 at 6k rpm and watch it go.
My brother had a 2014 Ram with the 5.7 and A8. It was a low 14's, high 13's truck stock. The 2014 5.3 Silverado was not touching that.
Old 02-22-2017, 08:34 AM
  #33  
9 Second Club
 
WisT02ws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 22
Received 45 Likes on 30 Posts

Default

My 02 WS6 M6 made 321 bone stock, 340 with a lid and a tune.
Old 02-22-2017, 09:09 AM
  #34  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
kinglt-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft. Wayne, IN
Posts: 5,794
Received 196 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by WisT02ws6
My 02 WS6 M6 made 321 bone stock, 340 with a lid and a tune.
Pretty much spot on with what I posted.

My 02 A4 made 330 320 with stock lid, headers, exhaust, and tune. The guy I bought it from put the stock lid back on it and dyno'd it before selling it to me.
Old 02-22-2017, 09:55 AM
  #35  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,927
Received 412 Likes on 330 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by kinglt-1
My brother had a 2014 Ram with the 5.7 and A8. It was a low 14's, high 13's truck stock. The 2014 5.3 Silverado was not touching that.
Seems as tho that 5.7 ram is faster than the challenger then......the new 6.2 silverado and the ecoboost.

I mean we all know it's not tho. Unless maybe it was a 2wd rcsb truck. Then who gives a ****....it's barely a truck at all.

Jp is likely not talking about anything that new. But i would see no reason why a new 5.3 and new 5.7 hemi wouldn't be close. The 14 trucks were the last of the old 5.3's i believe. No doubt the updated hemi had a edge there. Also my comparisons are typically similar trucks.....except for those 1/2 hemis i smashed with my 3/4 ton.
Old 02-22-2017, 11:20 AM
  #36  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
UltraZLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hanover, Michigan
Posts: 1,264
Received 55 Likes on 40 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
Seems as tho that 5.7 ram is faster than the challenger then......the new 6.2 silverado and the ecoboost.

I mean we all know it's not tho. Unless maybe it was a 2wd rcsb truck. Then who gives a ****....it's barely a truck at all.

Jp is likely not talking about anything that new. But i would see no reason why a new 5.3 and new 5.7 hemi wouldn't be close. The 14 trucks were the last of the old 5.3's i believe. No doubt the updated hemi had a edge there. Also my comparisons are typically similar trucks.....except for those 1/2 hemis i smashed with my 3/4 ton.
14 is new 5.3 I got one. Last year of the 6 speed auto. 15 up have a8 I think.

My friend has a 2012 4wd 2500 5.7 hemi truck. Mine is a 4wd 1500.

Be pretty close stock if I guessed. With my headers and tune and E85 in the tank now I'd win for sure. He still stock.

If his truck were a 1500 I'd have to give him the edge both stock. Just guessing.

As for the 6.2 Silverado. Different league than the 5.7. Not even close on my butt dyno anyway
Old 02-22-2017, 11:28 AM
  #37  
Launching!
iTrader: (10)
 
sw07gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 232
Received 41 Likes on 22 Posts

Default

In Hio world chevy never loses. Ever.
Old 02-22-2017, 11:36 AM
  #38  
Staging Lane
 
freaky57fast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Northern Michigan
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kinglt-1
My brother had a 2014 Ram with the 5.7 and A8. It was a low 14's, high 13's truck stock. The 2014 5.3 Silverado was not touching that.
my 2010 ram sport with a intake and taller than stock tires ran like a 14.8 or something like that.
Old 02-22-2017, 11:55 AM
  #39  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
JC316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 367
Received 78 Likes on 57 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
Idk about that last sentence. I have gave it to several hemis. My truck is a 2500hd with the 6.0.....I've ran 1/2 tons to. A 5.7 hemi in a 2500 like mine gets demolished. My uncles 5.3 whooped up on my neighbors 5.7 hemi too, both rcsb. And similar years.

My guess is you can't drive. Punch the tow haul button and manually shift the 5.3 or 6.0 at 6k rpm and watch it go.
Being fair, the ram isn't 100% stock. CAI and tune. The Silverado has a catback. Even still though, the Hemi dynos around 265 to the 5.3L's 245. 6.0L would have an easier time.
Old 02-22-2017, 03:20 PM
  #40  
Banned
 
RedFuryZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by WisT02ws6
My 02 WS6 M6 made 321 bone stock, 340 with a lid and a tune.
Nice numbers. That car would have destroyed stock 5.br0s, with those 2 cheap mods. Probably when it was bone stock too.


Quick Reply: This doesn't seem right??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:20 PM.