SCT 2016 Mustang GT vs Tuned 2016 Camaro SS - Page 2 - LS1TECH



Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

SCT 2016 Mustang GT vs Tuned 2016 Camaro SS

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-07-2017, 10:18 AM   #21
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
marc97taws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: DSM
Posts: 1,431
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2003Cobro View Post
You guys are nuts. That CAI is sure gonna make a HUGE difference in the run. Truth is shown in the runs. Suxgen is slightly quicker. We all know this.
I think Poppa actually slowed down with a CAI on his s550 over stock airbox. Uhhohh
marc97taws6 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2017, 10:43 AM   #22
Launching!
iTrader: (10)
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 229
Default

Camaro has 8-10 car length advantage stock. Just remember that.
sw07gt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2017, 10:50 AM   #23
11 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
 
necrocannibal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Memphis,TN
Posts: 1,300
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Slow View Post
Can this letters on the tire trend go away now, please? Looks awful.
Agreed. This isn't the 70s, looks dumb as hell. Maybe they could jack the back end of cars up to and make them slope forward while they are at it.
necrocannibal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2017, 11:05 AM   #24
Teching In
 
2003Cobro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by necrocannibal View Post
Agreed. This isn't the 70s, looks dumb as hell. Maybe they could jack the back end of cars up to and make them slope forward while they are at it.
Those things disgust me.
2003Cobro is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2017, 12:00 PM   #25
Teching In
 
swapped3vgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: miami fl
Posts: 0
Default

Imho you swapped passenger and the mustang will take the cake an extra added weight makes a big difference in a race no passenger and it looks like a tie or the ss by a fender .
swapped3vgt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2017, 02:38 PM   #26
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
UltraZLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hanover, Michigan
Posts: 1,195
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sw07gt View Post
Camaro has 8-10 car length advantage stock. Just remember that.
Hero times are a half second.

The difference is about 5 cars stock to stock

They respond different to different mods. Both on 91 tunes the coyote gains more. Both on E85 tunes the 6g.

And this is one video. I've seen 50 with a lot different results. Personally I've easily beaten a tune and drag pack s550 by a half second. Best time to best time running all night.

In the end anything can happen on the street and the mustang is no slouch
UltraZLS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2017, 03:09 PM   #27
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Clear Lake Tx
Posts: 76
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by UltraZLS1 View Post
Hero times are a half second.

The difference is about 5 cars stock to stock

They respond different to different mods. Both on 91 tunes the coyote gains more. Both on E85 tunes the 6g.

And this is one video. I've seen 50 with a lot different results. Personally I've easily beaten a tune and drag pack s550 by a half second. Best time to best time running all night.

In the end anything can happen on the street and the mustang is no slouch
so much truth here Ultra. I couldn't have said it better.
Fast02Z06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2017, 01:29 PM   #28
Launching!
iTrader: (17)
 
5.7stroker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: OH
Posts: 294
Default

I rented a 2016 auto 5.0 last week. 12.9 sec @ 110.0 mph my ***...that thing felt slow as hell even in "track mode".
5.7stroker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2017, 01:35 PM   #29
Teching In
 
2003Cobro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5.7stroker View Post
I rented a 2016 auto 5.0 last week. 12.9 sec @ 110.0 mph my ***...that thing felt slow as hell even in "track mode".
Thats because you actually rented a V6. Good try tho.
2003Cobro is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2017, 02:16 PM   #30
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (7)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 3,809
Default

I can confirm they feel pretty poopy stock. They have no real area of power. It just seems like they rev....change a gwar rev some more and so on. Nothing really kicks you in the back with them.

And the car wrapped around the motor is really kinda subpar. It's just ok.
HioSSilver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2017, 02:30 PM   #31
On The Tree
 
Nick.H's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Tmec, CA
Posts: 106
Default

The car itself is a hell of a lot better than a 5gen lol
Nick.H is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2017, 02:54 PM   #32
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (7)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 3,809
Default

Lol....no the car it's self in all performance catagories gets its **** pushed by a 5gen gen. The only place the 5br0 even competes is in a straight line. And that's only due to a massive gear advantage.
HioSSilver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2017, 02:56 PM   #33
Teching In
 
V8EATR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 36
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HioSSilver View Post
I can confirm they feel pretty poopy stock. They have no real area of power. It just seems like they rev....change a gwar rev some more and so on. Nothing really kicks you in the back with them.

And the car wrapped around the motor is really kinda subpar. It's just ok.
Really depends on what gears they have in them. My car with 3.73's feels just as torque if not more than my LS2 GTO did. My car on 93 pump several mods ago made 393? wheel torque, same as the GTO.
V8EATR is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2017, 03:10 PM   #34
Launching!
iTrader: (17)
 
5.7stroker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: OH
Posts: 294
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2003Cobro View Post
Thats because you actually rented a V6. Good try tho.
Nope, it was so slow I actually had to pop the hood to confirm that it wasn't a v6.

Quote:
Originally Posted by V8EATR View Post
Really depends on what gears they have in them. My car with 3.73's feels just as torque if not more than my LS2 GTO did. My car on 93 pump several mods ago made 393? wheel torque, same as the GTO.
This auto definitely had the 3.31's. Definitely could have used some 3.73's. My old 04 would have pulled bus lengths on it, just like my 2000 SS pulled bus lengths on my 04. I miss my sexy screaming yellow 04.


Last edited by 5.7stroker; 03-08-2017 at 03:27 PM.
5.7stroker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2017, 03:22 PM   #35
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
ZYBORG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: S. FL/TX
Posts: 20
Default

As expected, more modded 5.fail loses to less modded 6g ss.

As expected, 5.0 faggotry ensues, bros raging with excuses.

A little surprised that a 6g with lamo tire stickers managed to win over a more modded 5.0.... lol
ZYBORG is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2017, 04:53 PM   #36
On The Tree
 
Nick.H's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Tmec, CA
Posts: 106
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HioSSilver View Post
Lol....no the car it's self in all performance catagories gets its **** pushed by a 5gen gen. The only place the 5br0 even competes is in a straight line. And that's only due to a massive gear advantage.
I was referring to interior design/quality/ride
Nick.H is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2017, 05:01 PM   #37
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (41)
 
Mike Morris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Md/PA/FL
Posts: 1,091
Default

Mag tests had them very close in the straights.
Mike Morris is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2017, 05:12 PM   #38
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
ZYBORG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: S. FL/TX
Posts: 20
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sw07gt View Post
At least they're running equal power adder.
Wrong. Too much dick in the *** is harmful. You should have your eyes check out mayne. Either that or you have cognitive issues. Try seeking help from a mental health professional if the Ophthalmologist appt. checks out ok.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlkMach1 View Post
Tire stencils cost the LTjuan a couple lengths.
Correct. Any goober that adds sticker letters to their car, surely doesnt know what the **** he is doing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by V8EATR View Post
Damn good runs. No passenger that would be close. Camaro must need maintenance, didn't gap enough.
Definitely needs maintenance.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedFuryZ28 View Post
The more modded br0 still got walked bad. Even after jumping the first time.
Correct.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2003Cobro View Post
You guys are nuts. That CAI is sure gonna make a HUGE difference in the run. Truth is shown in the runs. Suxgen is slightly quicker. We all know this.
Wrong. How about CAI and cat delete (you know, thise little thinggies magigs, that cause the most restriction on the exhaust side).

Quote:
Originally Posted by marc97taws6 View Post
I think Poppa actually slowed down with a CAI on his s550 over stock airbox. Uhhohh
CAI = loss of power
E85 = dien do nuffin

Apparently in the bros world mods just dont apply.... dont count.... No wait, in 5.world, mods hurt you...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick.H View Post
The car itself is a hell of a lot better than a 5gen lol
Quit smocking rocks meng. You havent the slightest clue.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HioSSilver View Post
Lol....no the car it's self in all performance catagories gets its **** pushed by a 5gen gen. The only place the 5br0 even competes is in a straight line. And that's only due to a massive gear advantage.
Correct.

5G OWNS the s197 in overal package/performance, to include my shelbro.
5G is also better than the S-fail50 in overal package/performance, excluding the shelbros.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick.H View Post
I was referring to interior design/quality/ride
Again. STFU. You know nothing.
ZYBORG is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2017, 05:19 PM   #39
On The Tree
 
Nick.H's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Tmec, CA
Posts: 106
Default

I've driven a fair amount of both. You're entitled to your opinion, no matter how biased it may be. 5th visibility is awful. Because of the small *** windshield the HUD gets very annoying. S550 interior quality is much higher, gauges aren't placed like **** as they are in the 5th. That being said I don't necessarily mind either. I'd still buy a 5gen before a yote because I'm not a dohc fan. But if neither were performance oriented I'd take the s550, on interior and ride alone (although I haven't driven a 1LE, so not sure how big the difference is between that and the 2SS ride quality)
Nick.H is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2017, 05:22 PM   #40
Launching!
iTrader: (10)
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 229
Default

Good to know that a CAI + a passenger turns 8-10 cars lengths in to 1-1.5.
sw07gt is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stock 2016 Camaro SS vs Bolt-On 5.0 c6ftw Street Racing & Kill Stories 318 04-16-2017 07:39 AM
Rematch: "Stock 2016 SS vs Bolt-on 2016 Mustang GT c6ftw Street Racing & Kill Stories 59 03-14-2017 09:03 PM
2016 camaro M6 vs 2016 mustang II m6 big hammer Street Racing & Kill Stories 63 01-18-2017 01:38 AM
16 camero vs 16 3mod big hammer Street Racing & Kill Stories 205 03-18-2016 07:35 AM
Wait is over....My 5.0 vs 2016 Camaro SS 99whitez28 Street Racing & Kill Stories 633 03-17-2016 09:23 AM


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:47 PM.


 
  • Ask a Question
    Get answers from community experts
What's your question?
Send