White Whale VS FBO C7GS
#41
7 Second Club
Thread Starter
Thanks mang!
Where is my boast at?
Leave it to this guy to CRY like a ***** over a vette kill....in SRK.
Guys like this is why I love racing vettes.
He must have missed my HCEI + blower C6Z kill this year and my modded C6ZR1 kill in the past.
I think I've seen you cry on C5 about **** too.
PS. What's your fav wax and no toon mod(s)?
Thanks dude!
lol...I haven't been killed by a vette as of yet.
TY!
Jake and TonyGXP?
That sounds legit!
how many ***** box rotary or civics do you see run 9's or better and you wouldn't trade your car for one in a million years?
and yet here you are on "LS1"tech boasting about beating a low 12 second corvette which no matter who or WHERE you ask 100 out of 100 people are picking that GS over that ugly outdated junk box.. no matter how fast it is.. big deal. your jealousy and envy is laughable.
juuuuunk.
and yet here you are on "LS1"tech boasting about beating a low 12 second corvette which no matter who or WHERE you ask 100 out of 100 people are picking that GS over that ugly outdated junk box.. no matter how fast it is.. big deal. your jealousy and envy is laughable.
juuuuunk.
Leave it to this guy to CRY like a ***** over a vette kill....in SRK.
Guys like this is why I love racing vettes.
He must have missed my HCEI + blower C6Z kill this year and my modded C6ZR1 kill in the past.
I think I've seen you cry on C5 about **** too.
PS. What's your fav wax and no toon mod(s)?
Thanks dude!
lol...I haven't been killed by a vette as of yet.
Jake and TonyGXP?
That sounds legit!
#42
Doesn't it get old, that when you get embarrassed, you just say someone is your puppet?
Whatever you call me, doesn't change the fact your car does 0-100 in 16ish seconds. Your car is an abomination. It runs so poorly we're all just waiting for you to be like "HA just trollin bromeos! It's really a V6!"
Whatever you call me, doesn't change the fact your car does 0-100 in 16ish seconds. Your car is an abomination. It runs so poorly we're all just waiting for you to be like "HA just trollin bromeos! It's really a V6!"
#43
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
how many ***** box rotary or civics do you see run 9's or better and you wouldn't trade your car for one in a million years?
and yet here you are on "LS1"tech boasting about beating a low 12 second corvette which no matter who or WHERE you ask 100 out of 100 people are picking that GS over that ugly outdated junk box.. no matter how fast it is.. big deal. your jealousy and envy is laughable.
juuuuunk.
and yet here you are on "LS1"tech boasting about beating a low 12 second corvette which no matter who or WHERE you ask 100 out of 100 people are picking that GS over that ugly outdated junk box.. no matter how fast it is.. big deal. your jealousy and envy is laughable.
juuuuunk.
#48
TECH Enthusiast
i had to think about it, but when I first turbocharged this car in 2009 I had 3.90's in it.
Now that is way too much gear, but it was a fearsome accelerating car with a smaller turbo at 16 psi. Much faster than now.
I had to put this gear in back when I was driving 160 miles a day and gas was 4.00 a gallon. I realize it has to go and soon. I'm still trashing turbocharged factory cars, so it isn't too bad. It just isn't what it needs to be. It's on the list when Im able to spend money.
Now that is way too much gear, but it was a fearsome accelerating car with a smaller turbo at 16 psi. Much faster than now.
I had to put this gear in back when I was driving 160 miles a day and gas was 4.00 a gallon. I realize it has to go and soon. I'm still trashing turbocharged factory cars, so it isn't too bad. It just isn't what it needs to be. It's on the list when Im able to spend money.
#49
7 Second Club
Thread Starter
i had to think about it, but when I first turbocharged this car in 2009 I had 3.90's in it.
Now that is way too much gear, but it was a fearsome accelerating car with a smaller turbo at 16 psi. Much faster than now.
I had to put this gear in back when I was driving 160 miles a day and gas was 4.00 a gallon. I realize it has to go and soon. I'm still trashing turbocharged factory cars, so it isn't too bad. It just isn't what it needs to be. It's on the list when Im able to spend money.
Now that is way too much gear, but it was a fearsome accelerating car with a smaller turbo at 16 psi. Much faster than now.
I had to put this gear in back when I was driving 160 miles a day and gas was 4.00 a gallon. I realize it has to go and soon. I'm still trashing turbocharged factory cars, so it isn't too bad. It just isn't what it needs to be. It's on the list when Im able to spend money.
#51
#54
7 Second Club
Thread Starter
#55
TECH Enthusiast
#56
7 Second Club
Thread Starter
I was on Lund 91 pump toon, 2.3L VMP Gen II TVS,KB BAP, 72lbs injectors, 2.4 inch upper/10% lower, upgraded HE/IC, JLT 123mm CAI, BMR suspension, aluminum DS and some weight reduction.
Note: I have a 75 jet I can hit as well but no nawz was burnt in this vid.
#58
TECH Enthusiast
#59