Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

13 coyote vs 1990 ZR1!!!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-25-2017, 06:52 PM
  #61  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
UltraZLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hanover, Michigan
Posts: 1,264
Received 55 Likes on 40 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by redctsv
Dont quote me 100% but i remember reading an old article way back in the day( i forgot what magazine) but when gm tested and compared the chevy dohc vs the ohv motor at the time everyone chose to go with the ohv as it was faster and the instant torque.
Ive heard that too.

They had cars with both motors and were driven extensively. Everyone chose the ls. Henceforth GM stayed with pushrod...
Old 07-26-2017, 07:08 AM
  #62  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (17)
 
AnotherWs6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 2,672
Likes: 0
Received 36 Likes on 30 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by redctsv
Dont quote me 100% but i remember reading an old article way back in the day( i forgot what magazine) but when gm tested and compared the chevy dohc vs the ohv motor at the time everyone chose to go with the ohv as it was faster and the instant torque.
In addition it is less complicated and expensive, the ohv motor. It's not JUST about power, it's about value and durability. Having said that, I think a modern ZR1 with some form of dohc would be great instead of just sticking a blower on an LS. That's what everyone is doing these days, just slapping a blower on and getting huge numbers. Takes some of the fun out of it IMO.

Another thing to note is that Vette's have typically gotten the new technology first, then it trickles down to the cars and trucks a few years later. Since the vast majority of V8's that GM sells are in trucks it makes sense to develop a platform for the vette that will translate over to trucks well. Costly, complicated, higher RPM engines are not what trucks need. LS motors lack low-end grunt as it is in heavy *** trucks.
Old 07-27-2017, 07:16 AM
  #63  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (24)
 
codyvette's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Brazoria TX
Posts: 857
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MACHXLR8
Maybe what GM could have done is just keep this DOHC motor for the Vette only and then use their LS Series motors for their other line of cars or trucks.

It would have not been because of a performance difference since LS motors make great power for their size but more to distinguish the Vette from the Camaro line and do more experimentation with a DOHC motor in terms of a small displacement, high rpms and FI.

Just saying, it could have been a selling point.
Come on Mach, In the end they are still big business execs. They can't be overly rational!
Old 07-28-2017, 01:22 PM
  #64  
Staging Lane
 
89BANDIT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: LI.NY
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AnotherWs6
In addition it is less complicated and expensive, the ohv motor. It's not JUST about power, it's about value and durability. Having said that, I think a modern ZR1 with some form of dohc would be great instead of just sticking a blower on an LS. That's what everyone is doing these days, just slapping a blower on and getting huge numbers. Takes some of the fun out of it IMO.

Another thing to note is that Vette's have typically gotten the new technology first, then it trickles down to the cars and trucks a few years later. Since the vast majority of V8's that GM sells are in trucks it makes sense to develop a platform for the vette that will translate over to trucks well. Costly, complicated, higher RPM engines are not what trucks need. LS motors lack low-end grunt as it is in heavy *** trucks.
Agreed, no reason they cant do a healthy GENI or GENII SBC with a LTR type intake, for the truck market. Vortech heads and direct port injection. They should be able to squeeze out the MPG's they need.
Old 07-29-2017, 07:32 PM
  #65  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
marc97taws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: DSM
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Br0s must suck pretty bad always being compared to corvettes.
Old 07-31-2017, 08:12 AM
  #66  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
ohioborn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 214
Received 252 Likes on 164 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by marc97taws6
Br0s must suck pretty bad always being compared to corvettes.
Facts. Maybe it was the missing camaro for all those years till finally they got the 6th gen
Old 07-31-2017, 08:26 AM
  #67  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
big hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: over dere
Posts: 3,428
Received 152 Likes on 104 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by marc97taws6
Br0s must suck pretty bad always being compared to corvettes.
30 year old vettes!
Old 07-31-2017, 08:46 AM
  #68  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (24)
 
codyvette's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Brazoria TX
Posts: 857
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ohioborn80
Facts. Maybe it was the missing camaro for all those years till finally they got the 6th gen
You may be on to something here.
Old 07-31-2017, 10:36 AM
  #69  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,927
Received 412 Likes on 330 Posts

Default

Well....we can tell how effective the dohc furds are by how good they run na.........
Old 07-31-2017, 12:16 PM
  #70  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (55)
 
Mike Morris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Md/PA/FL
Posts: 1,602
Received 61 Likes on 50 Posts

Default

LT5 blows the Coyote away n/a or with boost. Its size advantage is one big reason why
Old 07-31-2017, 12:27 PM
  #71  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
big hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: over dere
Posts: 3,428
Received 152 Likes on 104 Posts

Default

Ford needs to increase their bore spacing. Like they did with their ls3 copy in the trucks. That engine had more potential
Old 07-31-2017, 01:58 PM
  #72  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
JC316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 367
Received 78 Likes on 57 Posts

Default

I love the bragging on the LT5 like it was some GM designer that made it. Lotus designed that engine and Mercury Marine built it. When GM tried to do the same, they came up with the epic fail that is the Northstar.
Old 07-31-2017, 02:16 PM
  #73  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
TT427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 372
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JC316
I love the bragging on the LT5 like it was some GM designer that made it. Lotus designed that engine and Mercury Marine built it. When GM tried to do the same, they came up with the epic fail that is the Northstar.
too much wrong with this failed comment to respond...
Old 07-31-2017, 02:33 PM
  #74  
TECH Apprentice
 
CamOnlyJabroni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 321
Received 88 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JC316
I love the bragging on the 5.0 like it was some Ford designer that made it. BMW helped design that engine and Ford built it. When Ford tried to do the same, they came up with the epic fail that is the 3V.
Fixed
Old 07-31-2017, 02:36 PM
  #75  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
big hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: over dere
Posts: 3,428
Received 152 Likes on 104 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JC316
I love the bragging on the LT5 like it was some GM designer that made it. Lotus designed that engine and Mercury Marine built it. When GM tried to do the same, they came up with the epic fail that is the Northstar.
Gm owned lotus then. I guess what you're saying is the ford GT isn't a ford because someone else builds it
Old 07-31-2017, 02:36 PM
  #76  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
big hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: over dere
Posts: 3,428
Received 152 Likes on 104 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CamOnlyJabroni
Fixed
Jarred!
Old 07-31-2017, 02:46 PM
  #77  
Launching!
iTrader: (10)
 
sw07gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 232
Received 41 Likes on 22 Posts

Default

Didn't realize so many GM guys were DOHC fans. Coyote is pretty good.
Old 07-31-2017, 02:52 PM
  #78  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
big hammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: over dere
Posts: 3,428
Received 152 Likes on 104 Posts

Default

DOHC is ok. Fords version of it is trash
Old 07-31-2017, 03:04 PM
  #79  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
JC316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 367
Received 78 Likes on 57 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TT427
too much wrong with this failed comment to respond...
Yet you still responded. I'll bite though, what is wrong with the statement? Lets see, did Lotus design the motor? Yep... Did mercury marine build it? Yep. Did the northstar draw design cues from it? Yep. Did the northstar suck? Absofuckinglutely.

Originally Posted by CamOnlyJabroni
Fixed
Since when did BMW help design the Coyote? Even if it's true, which I doubt, there is a big difference in helping and saying "do what you want with it, just make sure it's 5.7L"

Originally Posted by big hammer
Gm owned lotus then. I guess what you're saying is the ford GT isn't a ford because someone else builds it
Ford designed the car, it has a Ford designed engine, so it's a Ford. Still it's apples to oranges, we aren't comparing cars here, we are comparing engines. LT5 vs Coyote, so it's Lotus vs Ford, not GM vs ford.

Oh and another fun fact, the best 4 cylinder engine that GM has ever had, was also designed by Lotus. Ecotec. Seems the only thing GM got right in the 80's-2000's was the LS engine.
Old 07-31-2017, 03:05 PM
  #80  
Launching!
iTrader: (10)
 
sw07gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 232
Received 41 Likes on 22 Posts

Default

8.50s SLB is pretty trash agree. Just can't be replicated by a GM car.


Quick Reply: 13 coyote vs 1990 ZR1!!!!!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:00 AM.