NateLS1Mustang

iTrader: (2)

I can agree with the LSx statement I suppose.

So hambone does not have a big bore LS3. It's a max effort LSx on race gas, agreed?

Nick.H

Nothing LS is ever max effort.

HioSSilver

iTrader: (8)

Max effort ls stuff....if you truly want max effort make 850-over 1100 hp. 700ish na crank hp is childs play for lsx stuff these days. All that means is you have your head completely in your ***.

Hammer built a pump gas friendly engine that runs very well. But it's not max effort.

kinglt-1

iTrader: (26)

Or don't have deep enough pockets. Building a NA 850+ hp LSx is not pocket change like it is putting turbskis on a stock 5.3.

NateLS1Mustang

iTrader: (2)

May be pump has friendly but certainly isn't on pump gas lmfao. All of us already know he was using race gas.

snake95

So let's recap - my car with stock block and rotating assembly, stock trans, stock rear, no WR other than from parts swapping, is called max effort by you regularly, but an LS car that doesn't even have an LS production engine, or same cubic inches as a production engine, that runs on race gas and won't drive more than 2 miles from where it's parked is a pump gas friendly car? Basically a Prius, right?

How many gallons of GM LS semen do you take shots of, daily? Is 5 gallons a day a pretty conservative guess?

HioSSilver

iTrader: (8)

Hotrodding in general is costly. Power is $....how much can you afford to make.

It's pretty damn easy to get to 700ish tho. 408/ls3 gmpp heads the right cam and your there.

So are you saying all the 5br0s on ftw are doin it wrong. Or did hammer just get on their level and out power every one of them.

You do realize you're not out of bolt on ls1 territory right?

Hammer also don't have to worry about his block eating itself like yours.


You wake up with a henry ford ***** in your ***.

snake95

Maybe an LS1 with more bolt-offs than bolt ons, like hammers was. I still haven't ran my car yet as it sits to tell?

The bolt on LS1 you had a hand in, couldn't cut it, ran slower than me, too. Add it to the list of cars you've helped build that have been slower than 302 cubic inches from 1985.
-termi swap notch
-some fugly *** c4
-boltoff 4th gen

HioSSilver

iTrader: (8)

Nathans car didn't even need headers ti run your times

And garrenteed it wouldn't have got drug by a,114 trap car like you did

snake95

So what's more important, dig runs or rolls because you flip flop every time depending on what helps your **** talking.

You've been quoted on here talking about how dig runs are more important, yet in the case of the more powerful car beating me from a roll (shocker ) you reference the 1/4 mile time. What does a roll race have to do with the quarter mile from a dead stop

That 12.0 run in the termi notch would be about a 12.3 @ 117 here. I'd have you spitting out excuses faster than that head could bobble

HioSSilver

iTrader: (8)

I guess whenever you post a dig street run we'll talk about those. Till then you're a roll racer.

Digs are muh fave. But i have accomodated those that like to roll from time to time.


Oh I'm sure your track is the slowest in the nation after your results

islander033

But absolutely refused when Poppa wanted to dig Philly. WTF and Hahaha and

Nick.H

Poppacap has even said they weren't sure where they would dig

Mike Morris

iTrader: (55)

Poppa had tire and Phil didn't that is why...

islander033

True...but the crew out right denied the possibility of even trying.
Thanks for confirming that they were skerred to dig vs Poppa.