LT1 supra vs 03 GT (cobra clone) vid
04-24-2018, 11:46 AM
#41
Teching In
Its pretty easy to tell the difference between 300whp and 400whp, moron. Not too mention you actually thought that a h/c LT1 should make 300whp. Loooool!! You clearly don't know ****.
And did you really just imply that a 95 pustang GT is faster than an LT1 F body? Lmaooooo! Even a stock GTP walks those turds. You really are a TRUE Mustang jackass.
And did you really just imply that a 95 pustang GT is faster than an LT1 F body? Lmaooooo! Even a stock GTP walks those turds. You really are a TRUE Mustang jackass.
04-24-2018, 01:21 PM
#42
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Typical mustang jackass at its finest. Tell everyone again how a 95 gt is faster than an LT1. Im sure they could use another good laugh, fat **** lol.
P.S. your cobro would get throttled badly.
04-24-2018, 02:13 PM
#44
Teching In
04-25-2018, 09:09 AM
#47
It's not even close man. The LT1 is a million miles above the 5.0 Ford had in the 90s. GTs were barely getting 200hp to the wheels when the LT1 came out(like, literally 5hp away from being in the 1xx's lol), and manual LT1s were doing 265 all day. Then there is a 50+ hp difference mod for mod since the LT1 responds so much better than the 5.0.
My 93 with bolt-ons put bus lengths on a friends H/C 95 Cobra in high school. He had Edlebrock heads, headers, and a shelf cam that I forgot what it was called (for some reason I wanna say 306 but that is an SBC cam). I had basic bolt ons - stall, headers, tune, BFG DR's, and some suspension. Ran 12.8s to his 13.4s at the same track same day, and put multiple lengths from any speed roll. Couple years later I eventually did H/C and I was in the 11s, and last I heard he was planning boost lmao.
Seriously, it wasn't even nearly close. LT1 to 5.0 is bigger difference than the LS1 and LT1.
My 93 with bolt-ons put bus lengths on a friends H/C 95 Cobra in high school. He had Edlebrock heads, headers, and a shelf cam that I forgot what it was called (for some reason I wanna say 306 but that is an SBC cam). I had basic bolt ons - stall, headers, tune, BFG DR's, and some suspension. Ran 12.8s to his 13.4s at the same track same day, and put multiple lengths from any speed roll. Couple years later I eventually did H/C and I was in the 11s, and last I heard he was planning boost lmao.
Seriously, it wasn't even nearly close. LT1 to 5.0 is bigger difference than the LS1 and LT1.
04-25-2018, 09:45 AM
#48
Teching In
It's not even close man. The LT1 is a million miles above the 5.0 Ford had in the 90s. GTs were barely getting 200hp to the wheels when the LT1 came out(like, literally 5hp away from being in the 1xx's lol), and manual LT1s were doing 265 all day. Then there is a 50+ hp difference mod for mod since the LT1 responds so much better than the 5.0.
My 93 with bolt-ons put bus lengths on a friends H/C 95 Cobra in high school. He had Edlebrock heads, headers, and a shelf cam that I forgot what it was called (for some reason I wanna say 306 but that is an SBC cam). I had basic bolt ons - stall, headers, tune, BFG DR's, and some suspension. Ran 12.8s to his 13.4s at the same track same day, and put multiple lengths from any speed roll. Couple years later I eventually did H/C and I was in the 11s, and last I heard he was planning boost lmao.
Seriously, it wasn't even nearly close. LT1 to 5.0 is bigger difference than the LS1 and LT1.
My 93 with bolt-ons put bus lengths on a friends H/C 95 Cobra in high school. He had Edlebrock heads, headers, and a shelf cam that I forgot what it was called (for some reason I wanna say 306 but that is an SBC cam). I had basic bolt ons - stall, headers, tune, BFG DR's, and some suspension. Ran 12.8s to his 13.4s at the same track same day, and put multiple lengths from any speed roll. Couple years later I eventually did H/C and I was in the 11s, and last I heard he was planning boost lmao.
Seriously, it wasn't even nearly close. LT1 to 5.0 is bigger difference than the LS1 and LT1.
04-25-2018, 10:29 AM
#49
Nice 60' btw. Did you push it through the beams?
.
04-25-2018, 11:05 AM
#50
Teching In
My not even full bolt on LT1 with 140k miles would have been beaten by 2-tenths by a H/C car? Congrats, I wouldn't brag about that lol. Once I went H/C (baby cam and no-name shop ported stock heads) I ran 11.7s soooooo...case and point, again.
Nice 60' btw. Did you push it through the beams?.
Nice 60' btw. Did you push it through the beams?
.
04-25-2018, 01:26 PM
#51
Lol I was 16 years old with a stick car on street tires. Not exactly a pro at the time. Either way I went to the track pretty often and raced plenty of LT1s. None were overly impressive. But it appears from your account the LT1 cars run even faster than LS1 cars with similar mods.
That wasn't even considered fast for an LT1, lol. Basically slightly better than average. It didn't even put me in the top 50 NA only LT1s on this site - I remember since that bummed me out and I felt like it was fast. Hell, bolt-on LT1s have been faster than my H/C times
. I was originally shooting for 12.5s w/ bolt-ons, which would have been considered quick back then on an LT1 car, and I had a few more things to do to it but gave up when I ran into a cheap set of ported heads on the forums. I remember the record was 11.9 when I was running a bolt-on car. Now its like 11.4 or something.Maybe I will get another LT1 for a bolt-on build just to beat your H/C 12.6
. Bet I can do it for maybe $6-7k all in, including the car.
04-25-2018, 01:45 PM
#53
Teching In
You must have the slowest LS1 cars around if you think 12.8s with bolt-ons and 11.7s with H/C is faster than them.
That wasn't even considered fast for an LT1, lol. Basically slightly better than average. It didn't even put me in the top 50 NA only LT1s on this site - I remember since that bummed me out and I felt like it was fast. Hell, bolt-on LT1s have been faster than my H/C times. I was originally shooting for 12.5s w/ bolt-ons, which would have been considered quick back then on an LT1 car, and I had a few more things to do to it but gave up when I ran into a cheap set of ported heads on the forums. I remember the record was 11.9 when I was running a bolt-on car. Now its like 11.4 or something.
Maybe I will get another LT1 for a bolt-on build just to beat your H/C 12.6. Bet I can do it for maybe $6-7k all in, including the car.
That wasn't even considered fast for an LT1, lol. Basically slightly better than average. It didn't even put me in the top 50 NA only LT1s on this site - I remember since that bummed me out and I felt like it was fast. Hell, bolt-on LT1s have been faster than my H/C times
. I was originally shooting for 12.5s w/ bolt-ons, which would have been considered quick back then on an LT1 car, and I had a few more things to do to it but gave up when I ran into a cheap set of ported heads on the forums. I remember the record was 11.9 when I was running a bolt-on car. Now its like 11.4 or something.Maybe I will get another LT1 for a bolt-on build just to beat your H/C 12.6
. Bet I can do it for maybe $6-7k all in, including the car.
04-25-2018, 04:25 PM
#55
IMO, the B body had the best factory LT1 cam. Had a ton more ***** down low and really didn't sacrifice much top end. The 260hp/330tq numbers were BS, it was more like 280hp/365tq.
04-25-2018, 07:33 PM
#56
I went 12.9 -13.3 108-110 with head cam Fox back in those times on street tires running Ford Motorsport crap. Of course the LT1 with the same mods were faster but you didn't run across many because the ten bolt couldn't take it,not many parts, and not many people the could tune them. So all you needed was tires and 31 spine axles. With slicks I was running low 12s which was normal. I did see many LT1s crack 13s bone stock though even autos. The C4s Vettes seemed to be a tad faster than the fbombs.
The 94 Cobra too was slower than the prior Cobra. I could get a 1993 Cobra to run with an LT1 twin M6 342 car to 100. Timing light,ditch silencer and drain one quart of oil out of it. If I had the ability to swap ECMs to an HO one it would be have been even better. The 93 Cobra could have been so much better but they had the weak T5 to deal with. MAF was bigger but flowed less,stock tun was terrible,stock HO manifolds and the Cobra cam in terms of 1/4 was worse than the latest 93 HO grind(87-88 cars had bigger cams). I still think a stripper 87 notch would have outrun a 93 Cobra to about 95MPH or so. The 94 Cobra gained weight,had crappy tune in it again and a smaller throttle body. It could run about the same as a 308 geared fox 5 speed. It was still like the 94 GT a much much better car. Lets not talk about the 96 GT I drove when they came out. No torque and reved even less....modulars back then were a nightmare.
The 94 Cobra too was slower than the prior Cobra. I could get a 1993 Cobra to run with an LT1 twin M6 342 car to 100. Timing light,ditch silencer and drain one quart of oil out of it. If I had the ability to swap ECMs to an HO one it would be have been even better. The 93 Cobra could have been so much better but they had the weak T5 to deal with. MAF was bigger but flowed less,stock tun was terrible,stock HO manifolds and the Cobra cam in terms of 1/4 was worse than the latest 93 HO grind(87-88 cars had bigger cams). I still think a stripper 87 notch would have outrun a 93 Cobra to about 95MPH or so. The 94 Cobra gained weight,had crappy tune in it again and a smaller throttle body. It could run about the same as a 308 geared fox 5 speed. It was still like the 94 GT a much much better car. Lets not talk about the 96 GT I drove when they came out. No torque and reved even less....modulars back then were a nightmare.
04-26-2018, 07:04 AM
#57
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
He would never do that. It would of course be a stalled auto car on slicks and skinnies. Just like it was with his 11.7 pass. If a 16 year old with edelbrock heads and an E cam can go 12.6 on street tires, im sure a well though out combo with traction could do much better. Most LT1s i saw back in the early 2000s were mid/low 14 second cars. Im sure all were just horrible drivers.
Way to make yourself look even dumber, shitbag. You didn't build that car when you were 16 either like you said awhile back. Thats why you're 40 now and can't do anything besides maybe bolt on a pulley and blower to your moon boosted turd. LoooooolAn LT1 f body is a full second and about 8-10 mph faster than your weak little 95 GT was, stock for stock and mod for mod. Like i said, even a GTP is faster than that turd. A little 3.8 V6.
Last edited by RedFuryZ28; 04-26-2018 at 07:24 AM.
04-26-2018, 08:44 AM
#58
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: DSM
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
95GTs were turds. A buddy’s stock one could barely pull away from the 03 2500HD ECSB 6.0 gasser from a 30 roll and that truck is a turd.
That being said, cousin’s buddy had a bolt on 94-95 or somewhere in there cobra that definitely gave my bolt on lt1 a run for its money back in the day.
That being said, cousin’s buddy had a bolt on 94-95 or somewhere in there cobra that definitely gave my bolt on lt1 a run for its money back in the day.
04-26-2018, 11:42 AM
#59
95GTs were turds. A buddy’s stock one could barely pull away from the 03 2500HD ECSB 6.0 gasser from a 30 roll and that truck is a turd.
That being said, cousin’s buddy had a bolt on 94-95 or somewhere in there cobra that definitely gave my bolt on lt1 a run for its money back in the day.
That being said, cousin’s buddy had a bolt on 94-95 or somewhere in there cobra that definitely gave my bolt on lt1 a run for its money back in the day.
04-26-2018, 12:18 PM
#60
On The Tree
So just because wittle JayPeabrain was stupid enough to take a fully built stroked pustang to the track on STREET TIRES, means that everyone in an LT1 should abide by your gay little stips? Way to make yourself look even dumber, shitbag. You didn't build that car when you were 16 either like you said awhile back. Thats why you're 40 now and can't do anything besides maybe bolt on a pulley and blower to your moon boosted turd. Looooool
An LT1 f body is a full second and about 8-10 mph faster than your weak little 95 GT was, stock for stock and mod for mod. Like i said, even a GTP is faster than that turd. A little 3.8 V6.
Way to make yourself look even dumber, shitbag. You didn't build that car when you were 16 either like you said awhile back. Thats why you're 40 now and can't do anything besides maybe bolt on a pulley and blower to your moon boosted turd. LoooooolAn LT1 f body is a full second and about 8-10 mph faster than your weak little 95 GT was, stock for stock and mod for mod. Like i said, even a GTP is faster than that turd. A little 3.8 V6.
And yeah it was back then lol. MF'r got pics of himself in high school with it