Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

Turbo 2v VS Hellcat

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-29-2018, 04:57 PM
  #21  
TECH Enthusiast
 
assasinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: huntsville Al
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Turbo2vGT

Yep, still a full interior car, heat, the super cool circa 2004 Mach 460 sound system and all, sans a rear seat. Still a cast iron block, would have liked a teskid for it. I don't even have tubular A arms on the car yet, so I can still save a bit of weight on the front.
i have all of the tubular stuff and the mach 460. its never going anywhere. full volume no distortion. subwoofer. its awesome.


truly, there is only so much weight it needs to lose. add boost. i think the most boost ive run is 18. i have certainly run that plenty of times. in using a **** on3 76/65 turbo. it works good enough for now.

your car is a first rate build. i try to advocate for terbos. i get picked on for it, but it always gets results. UNLESS its a coyote. i dont like a terbo on a coyote without the compression lowered to 10:1.

Last edited by assasinator; 06-29-2018 at 05:06 PM.
Old 06-29-2018, 05:35 PM
  #22  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Turbo2vGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Parma, Ohio
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by assasinator
i have all of the tubular stuff and the mach 460. its never going anywhere. full volume no distortion. subwoofer. its awesome.


truly, there is only so much weight it needs to lose. add boost. i think the most boost ive run is 18. i have certainly run that plenty of times. in using a **** on3 76/65 turbo. it works good enough for now.

your car is a first rate build. i try to advocate for terbos. i get picked on for it, but it always gets results. UNLESS its a coyote. i dont like a terbo on a coyote without the compression lowered to 10:1.
The power left on the table switching from an On 3 turbo to name brand is quite a bit. I'm running a gen 2 Precision 7675. She likes to party.
Old 06-29-2018, 07:10 PM
  #23  
TECH Enthusiast
 
assasinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: huntsville Al
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Turbo2vGT
The power left on the table switching from an On 3 turbo to name brand is quite a bit. I'm running a gen 2 Precision 7675. She likes to party.
yes i agree. the on3 is in the car for tuning and footprint. when i outgrow it ill change it.

i REALLY want to know what this turbo can do in a all out race mode at the track. its easy to switch it out.
Old 06-29-2018, 10:17 PM
  #24  
On The Tree
iTrader: (23)
 
Blown383LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 108
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Damn, that's a beat down. I'm glad to see you back op
Old 06-29-2018, 11:11 PM
  #25  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Turbo2vGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Parma, Ohio
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Blown383LS1
Damn, that's a beat down. I'm glad to see you back op
Thanks! Feels good to bring some content back. Past few years have been boring here. Trying to run what I can with this new setup. I have some liter bikes wanting to play, and an HCI/200 shot C6Z that will be playing soon
Old 07-03-2018, 03:28 PM
  #26  
Launching!
iTrader: (2)
 
Prototype007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 252
Received 34 Likes on 23 Posts

Default

That 2V is a beast!
Old 07-03-2018, 07:51 PM
  #27  
TECH Enthusiast
 
assasinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: huntsville Al
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Turbo2vGT
Thanks! Feels good to bring some content back. Past few years have been boring here. Trying to run what I can with this new setup. I have some liter bikes wanting to play, and an HCI/200 shot C6Z that will be playing soon

one of the things i like most about 94-04 mustangs VS corvettes is, there is no weight advanage for the vettes. they have to outpower and out torque your terbo. you dont have to make more power.

i know the vette still has an aero advantage if it's not a wide body. i dont think wide body vettes have a aero advantage.

your stock Cd is .36 a non widebody vette is .28 the Cd of a 96 no spoiler is .32 a widebody has a Cd of .34

Last edited by assasinator; 07-03-2018 at 07:59 PM.
Old 07-04-2018, 04:07 AM
  #28  
Teching In
 
Chris Arnold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 31
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Frontal area probably matters more. But, this is probably not going to come down to aero.
Old 07-04-2018, 07:10 AM
  #29  
On The Tree
 
Z28tek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 173
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Prototype007
That 2V is a beast!
Not something you read very often!
For a 2V it moves out for sure.
Old 07-08-2018, 10:14 PM
  #30  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Turbo2vGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Parma, Ohio
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Prototype007
That 2V is a beast!
Thanks man!

Originally Posted by assasinator
one of the things i like most about 94-04 mustangs VS corvettes is, there is no weight advanage for the vettes. they have to outpower and out torque your terbo. you dont have to make more power.

i know the vette still has an aero advantage if it's not a wide body. i dont think wide body vettes have a aero advantage.

your stock Cd is .36 a non widebody vette is .28 the Cd of a 96 no spoiler is .32 a widebody has a Cd of .34
He out-torques my car, but mine makes 100+ whp on race gas/higher boost. We are going to run vs me on pump gas first. We're about the same power then. And it's a 150 shot car, not 200. I was mistaken.

Originally Posted by Z28tek
Not something you read very often!
For a 2V it moves out for sure.
Thanks!

Here's a pic of the turd




Old 07-10-2018, 07:25 PM
  #31  
TECH Enthusiast
 
assasinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: huntsville Al
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Turbo2vGT
Thanks man!


He out-torques my car, but mine makes 100+ whp on race gas/higher boost. We are going to run vs me on pump gas first. We're about the same power then. And it's a 150 shot car, not 200. I was mistaken.


Thanks!

Here's a pic of the turd

it looks a hell of a lot better than my rusted corroded terbo lol. nice looking car.
Old 07-10-2018, 10:16 PM
  #32  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Turbo2vGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Parma, Ohio
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by assasinator
it looks a hell of a lot better than my rusted corroded terbo lol. nice looking car.
Rust is weight reduction lol thanks pal.
Old 07-10-2018, 10:33 PM
  #33  
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
ForceFedC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 233
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Turbo2vGT
Thanks man!


He out-torques my car, but mine makes 100+ whp on race gas/higher boost. We are going to run vs me on pump gas first. We're about the same power then. And it's a 150 shot car, not 200. I was mistaken.


Thanks!

Here's a pic of the turd

That's a purdy red! (Burgandy)
Old 07-11-2018, 11:00 AM
  #34  
Teching In
 
MACHXLR8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Damn, that is a clean car Turbo2VGT!
Clean and it runs hard. Can't go wrong with that.
Old 07-13-2018, 02:49 PM
  #35  
Teching In
 
Its Stock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Southern, IL
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

What heads are you running? TFS?
Old 07-14-2018, 01:14 AM
  #36  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Turbo2vGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Parma, Ohio
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ForceFedC5
That's a purdy red! (Burgandy)
Thanks!
I'm Ron Burgandy...?

Originally Posted by MACHXLR8
Damn, that is a clean car Turbo2VGT!
Clean and it runs hard. Can't go wrong with that.
Thank you!

Originally Posted by Its Stock
What heads are you running? TFS?
Yep. Out of the box TFS 38cc.

Old 07-14-2018, 08:12 PM
  #37  
TECH Enthusiast
 
assasinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: huntsville Al
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Turbo2vGT


Yep. Out of the box TFS 38cc.


well that makes sense. TFS heads outperform 4v stock heads.

Old 07-15-2018, 01:05 AM
  #38  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Turbo2vGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Parma, Ohio
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by assasinator
well that makes sense. TFS heads outperform 4v stock heads.
I love these with the cams I have with them, rev to 7200, it parties pretty hard up top. I'd like to get the heads and intake ported to match and see what it does. It should make close to 900whp on the setup with this turbo on 20+psi,
Old 07-23-2018, 02:12 PM
  #39  
Teching In
 
Its Stock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Southern, IL
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Whose grind are the cams? Todd I'm guessing?
Old 07-23-2018, 10:10 PM
  #40  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Turbo2vGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Parma, Ohio
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Its Stock
Whose grind are the cams? Todd I'm guessing?
Off the shelf grinds. CMS Stage 3's


Quick Reply: Turbo 2v VS Hellcat



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:18 PM.