2016 392 Charger vs 2005 Duramax
#1
On The Tree
Thread Starter
2016 392 Charger vs 2005 Duramax
Duramax has been wanting to run buddy in charger for a while now. He asked if I wanted to tag along, and I said I'd be camera car.
2016 392 Charger-Stock
2005 Duramax-Claims tune only
2004 E55(camera car) -Stock
2016 392 Charger-Stock
2005 Duramax-Claims tune only
2004 E55(camera car) -Stock
#3
On The Tree
Thread Starter
#5
On The Tree
Thread Starter
I caught him but I hit my govern right at his front door. We pulled over and laughed about it. He said he was sweating and looked down and seen how fast we were going and yeah boy! Lol He said he was doing around 140ish and I hit govern at 147. So I had 5-7mph on him
#6
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
Both at sea level would your car have such an advantage ?or is part of it the DA where you are and being fi correct ?
just from published times your car is a mid 12 car around 114. Just from one I seen maybe it was a slow test
Just wonder if you could pull on a 392 like that at sea level ? Because published times are very similar
just from published times your car is a mid 12 car around 114. Just from one I seen maybe it was a slow test
Just wonder if you could pull on a 392 like that at sea level ? Because published times are very similar
#7
On The Tree
Thread Starter
Both at sea level would your car have such an advantage ?or is part of it the DA where you are and being fi correct ?
just from published times your car is a mid 12 car around 114. Just from one I seen maybe it was a slow test
Just wonder if you could pull on a 392 like that at sea level ? Because published times are very similar
just from published times your car is a mid 12 car around 114. Just from one I seen maybe it was a slow test
Just wonder if you could pull on a 392 like that at sea level ? Because published times are very similar
Trending Topics
#9
On The Tree
Thread Starter
#11
On The Tree
Thread Starter
#13
On The Tree
Thread Starter