Originally Posted by HioSSilver

gm hasn't had a weaker bottom end than a coyote maybe ever. Even 97-99 ls1s were known to hold 600whp fine with the supposedly weaker rod bolts. Sbe ls6 been into the 9xxwhp....ls2 is very strong maybe the strongest of the bunch....ls3 can hold 900+......all the truck motors are stout af. Lt's has made gobs of power with the lt4 easily being stronger than any furd ever......then there's the lt5. furd has done a good job of changing it as technology has progressed. It's still not a great engine. It has to work really hard to keep up and that is showing with the many failures the gen3 cryote has had.
Ive said I'm pretty quiet on here. Hell I'm typically quiet even on here. Atleast until someone says something stupid to me over and over. You shoulda tried that on 4/20.

Remember.....I'm the one that left your kik. You don't see me chasing you around.


Gm definitely shouldn't have stopped making the fcar. That was a large let down fo sho. But it still took furd till 2011 to make a competitive mustang gt vs the the old fcars

actually furd hasn't made a engine yet as strong as the ls stuff. Lt stuff is on par or better than ls stuff. Lt4/5 is just simply way stronger than anything furd has ever made.


Go run bambi.....you skeered or something.


He only gets told it runs like **** all the time because he's on my *** all the time. If you have noticed when he or anyone else don't act like a dick neither do I.


Yea....you are in denial.

Furd does good evolving the mustang.....except for that whole 2/3v modular motor **** they made.

Gm seems scared to even advertise the camaro.


Sure you know what your car traps....you ran the damn thing.


The 5br0s not getting to 140 na unless it's in a 2200 fox.