Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

6th gen workin in mexico

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-10-2019, 01:30 PM
  #241  
Banned
 
HpipeFlowmasterStang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 21
Received 27 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

For real engine knowledge and how to obtain 1.2 60 foots with 9 second passes please contact RedfuryZ28.
Old 04-10-2019, 01:32 PM
  #242  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
SoFla01SSLookinstok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,541
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
You been trying to use something to disprove it....and yall keep coming up losers.




It's all bullshit. It's just a instant of line pressure. Once released it's gone and vastly inefficient. No doubt you would be faster with a auto.

That dyno was complete bs to. How do you get accurate measures when it's slipping like mad at lesser rpms? You can't....it can't apply power till it couples.

If a converter actually made 2.5x the tq it would show up in roll racing to.

As I've stated to you before. It's all on the slip. No equations needed. In reality you are the one writing stories. Just like flake.

That dyno chart was not BS.

You just grasping hard. But but if if if this & that would if if but. Lol. Very simple. It's only about your 1.26 60' time.


Originally Posted by HioSSilver
A converter don't make power dude. In order for it to multiply tq it has to come from somewhere.

A converter isn't much more than a slipping clutch. That's why they create so much heat. That heat is also wasted power.

It's known you don't know how a converter works. They also take power.

False.
Old 04-10-2019, 01:34 PM
  #243  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
TT427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 372
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HpipeFlowmasterStang
For real engine knowledge and how to obtain 1.2 60 foots with 9 second passes please contact RedfuryZ28.
lol! nice
Old 04-10-2019, 01:37 PM
  #244  
Teching In
 
NoEngineNawledge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
So 1.57 on stock converter. That likely stalls at 1500-1800 rpm. You're not at or anywhere near 500whp at that rpm. When i engaged my clutch at the rpm that a stick allows i can be making way more power than you are at your stall speed.

So good point Larry.



Please just post your experiences here so we can weed through the bullshit. If you have no practical experience then you simply have no say bec6you simply don't know wtf you're talking about.
I don’t physically need to be in a car or piloting a car to a 1.2 60ft to know that you’re a dumbass who is full of ****.
Old 04-10-2019, 01:38 PM
  #245  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
TT427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 372
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NoEngineNawledge
What are you wanting to extract? Even if he launches at peak power it would still never see a 1.2 60ft Lmao.
The low initial hp required to go 1.68 at a higher weight....
Old 04-10-2019, 01:40 PM
  #246  
Teching In
 
NoEngineNawledge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TT427
The low initial hp required to go 1.68 at a higher weight....
But sub 300whp cars cut 1.5s...
Old 04-10-2019, 01:43 PM
  #247  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,927
Received 412 Likes on 330 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by SoFla01SSLookinstok
As I've stated to you before. It's all on the slip. No equations needed. In reality you are the one writing stories. Just like flake.

That dyno chart was not BS.

You just grasping hard. But but if if if this & that would if if but. Lol. Very simple. It's only about your 1.26 60' time.





It's known you don't know how a converter works. They also take power.

False.
So they use power and make power....strange. that doesn't even sound right coming from your dumbass.

Yea man....the slip pans out. It's all there. Once moving the car accelerated the same.

You're the one grasping here. Trying to find anything you can to keep me down to just a .9 gap on you vs a 1.1sec gap.

Originally Posted by NoEngineNawledge
I don’t physically need to be in a car or piloting a car to a 1.2 60ft to know that you’re a dumbass who is full of ****.
Yes you need to make some passes to have any kind of idea at all. What is your experience? Tell us please
Old 04-10-2019, 01:44 PM
  #248  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,927
Received 412 Likes on 330 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TT427
The low initial hp required to go 1.68 at a higher weight....
Lol

Originally Posted by NoEngineNawledge
But sub 300whp cars cut 1.5s...
Tell us your experience please.
Old 04-10-2019, 01:47 PM
  #249  
Teching In
 
NoEngineNawledge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
So they use power and make power....strange. that doesn't even sound right coming from your dumbass.

Yea man....the slip pans out. It's all there. Once moving the car accelerated the same.

You're the one grasping here. Trying to find anything you can to keep me down to just a .9 gap on you vs a 1.1sec gap.



Yes you need to make some passes to have any kind of idea at all. What is your experience? Tell us please
Nope, sure don’t.
Old 04-10-2019, 01:52 PM
  #250  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
SoFla01SSLookinstok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,541
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
So they use power and make power....strange. that doesn't even sound right coming from your dumbass.

Yea man....the slip pans out. It's all there. Once moving the car accelerated the same.

You're the one grasping here. Trying to find anything you can to keep me down to just a .9 gap on you vs a 1.1sec gap.

Look up on it a little. You might understand. Not typing **** out for you.

So with all that extra momentum & speed you'd have to have to cut that 60'. Everything is slower 60'-down the track from your 10.9 run?

I don't give two ***** about my car track times vs yours. I'd still run you though. Lol.
Old 04-10-2019, 02:12 PM
  #251  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,927
Received 412 Likes on 330 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by NoEngineNawledge
Nope, sure don’t.
So no experience eehhh....then stfu

Originally Posted by SoFla01SSLookinstok
Look up on it a little. You might understand. Not typing **** out for you.

So with all that extra momentum & speed you'd have to have to cut that 60'. Everything is slower 60'-down the track from your 10.9 run?

I don't give two ***** about my car track times vs yours. I'd still run you though. Lol.
It's not a heavy clutch car. It has no momentum to carry . It only accelerates. So what you seen is the fact that it accelerated the entire track the same or nearly the same as i give no ***** about a few hundreths .....with the same power....same car blah blah. How ******* weird is that? It carried a .2ish better 69 the entire way done the track.......******* weird man.

Lets not take into account the fuel load was lighter on the 10.9 run or their could been different in atmospheric conditions or even the head wind that was dominate that day......yea lets just throw those factors out cause they don't suite your dumbass.
Old 04-10-2019, 02:18 PM
  #252  
Teching In
 
NoEngineNawledge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

I don’t know what is more embarrassing. Believing a 417whp car @ 3300 raceweight on road race suspension and not the correct tire cutting a 1.2 60ft without even trying hard? Or a car capable of cutting a 1.2 60ft but falling on it’s fat ****** face cause it doesn’t have the power to run a good time out the back? Lmfaooooooooo
Old 04-10-2019, 02:21 PM
  #253  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,927
Received 412 Likes on 330 Posts

Default

Idk what's more embarrassing.....never having left the 14s or never having made a pass while trying to tell someone all about your opinion. That has to either mean you and mac are tied for DMFY or you're on a whole nother level.
Old 04-10-2019, 02:23 PM
  #254  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
ddnspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 14,597
Received 1,736 Likes on 1,297 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TT427
That gearing/tire height also gets you 51 mph at 7000 rpm
like I said, we used all the numbers to the advantage and STILL proved it wasn't mathematically possible. >12 SLR
Old 04-10-2019, 02:29 PM
  #255  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
TT427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 372
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ddnspider
like I said, we used all the numbers to the advantage and STILL proved it wasn't mathematically possible. >12 SLR
It was also stated he would need to shift, I guess just that part was wrong
Old 04-10-2019, 02:30 PM
  #256  
Banned
 
HpipeFlowmasterStang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 21
Received 27 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Why does Hio keep getting owned on the internet?
Old 04-10-2019, 02:34 PM
  #257  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,927
Received 412 Likes on 330 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ddnspider
like I said, we used all the numbers to the advantage and STILL proved it wasn't mathematically possible. >12 SLR
Your math proved it was entirely possible. At only using engine tq it was never multiplied through the gearing. Which comes out to substantially more than the 700 engine tq.

Then there are other unknowns you never factored in because your *** got swolled up like a baboon when you failed to accomplish discrediting my 10.7 run.
Old 04-10-2019, 02:44 PM
  #258  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
ddnspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 14,597
Received 1,736 Likes on 1,297 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by TT427
It was also stated he would need to shift, I guess just that part was wrong
we assumed zero shift time and that 1st gear 2.66 would take it to 60....like I said we were generous and tried to prove it's possible.
Old 04-10-2019, 02:47 PM
  #259  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
TT427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 372
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ddnspider
we assumed zero shift time and that 1st gear 2.66 would take it to 60....like I said we were generous and tried to prove it's possible.
"So, he would have had to be in second gear by the end of his 60'" thats right from darth post... Dbl check this 37.4KN of force, or 8429 lbf. let me know what you get

Last edited by TT427; 04-10-2019 at 02:57 PM.
Old 04-10-2019, 02:51 PM
  #260  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,927
Received 412 Likes on 330 Posts

Default

Man i bet buttsniper really flips out trying to figure out how some manage to go 10s in the 12xmph range while some go 10s in the upper 13x mph range. Must thoroughly **** his equations.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:22 AM.