Irunelevens

Cute, smartass . As I said a couple years ago (been here a teeny bit longer than you), I made this title when I had my motorcycle. I'm not gonna change it just because I don't have it anymore. I'm still "GSRGuy94" on a few sites, and I sold my Integra 4 years ago. And also notice that I wasn't talking to you

TXZ28LS1

iTrader: (5)

good kill man!! the mach 1's are cool. but i still would take an LS1 for sure over it.!! LS1's FTW!!!

ta_06374

iTrader: (7)

Heres a example that I found from the Mustand forums.




2004 Mach 1 (13.03 @108.38mph) 2.0 60'
UPR O/R/X, FM Cat-back
4.10 gears, Mgw STS
KN Filter

jasonsblkws6

I actually have alot of respect for the mach's actually prolly a lil bit more so than the cobra's cuz they dont have a power adder. I actually ran this guy with a yellow mach 1 at ntr and i found his video posted and his only mods were prochamber midpipe, K&N filter, and 275 Nitto DRs running 12.54@109

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...ach+1%22&hl=en

and i know alot of ppl will call b/s but his car wasnt loud so i know he had the stock mufflers on there. Against me he ran a 12.717 and i ran a 12.711 and that was the closest race ive had at the track. I had a lid, exhaust, gears and dr's on my car then and yeah maybe he could have had gears also that he didnt admit too but i talked to the guy and he seemed pretty straight up and could drive the **** out of that car. I believe he told me he launched it from 5500 rpm's feathering the clutch out.

180ls1

iTrader: (4)

i know you were not talking to me i just wanted to know why you had that title.

MrElectric03

iTrader: (71)

Oh no way I would ever get rid of my LS1 much less for a stang...just saying if I ever did own a stang it would be a Mach 1

z28berryhill

iTrader: (26)

i dont like how mustang owners talk down one the ls1s

did they forget that they have the same liters as some v6 cars.....4.3 v6 chevy vortec to there best performing 4.6
kinda off topic but my 0.02 cents
good kill

big reg

iTrader: (28)

I hope you were kidding?? When I had just a lid, filter and catback, I never had a problem with Mach's. At the track the Mach is right there with a stock LS1 but on the freeway they are a tad slower. They will usually trap about 3-4 mph slower stock for stock from what I have seen. LS1's also dyno around 30+ more at the wheels stock. They will et right there with an LS1 though.

DBEST369

i hate mustakes

Zero4488

iTrader: (10)

Nice runs....it's always great to shut down a cocky stang owner.....

ThoR294

iTrader: (6)

btw, late 90s mustang with a 5.0? i thought they stopped the 5.0 in like 93-94. i know those mustangs that have the tail lights with the stupid spacers in them have the 4.6L, and the solid tails have the 302. *shrug*

Socalmach

Good kill.



Thanks for reminding me. That comment made zero sense.

LT1PwrdZ

iTrader: (1)

lol +1

z28berryhill

iTrader: (26)

it made sense it is saying how the motors are small as hell

speedshifterNC

iTrader: (1)

about what?...I said in favor of the lsx not beat it...read a little closer next time

Stopsign32v

iTrader: (1)

And? Doesn't that make it worse for you....Lets say it like if it was you "Damn I just got beat by a little 4.6L in my big 5.7L"

MrElectric03

iTrader: (71)

You are absolutly right...Im sorry I meant to put late 80s or early 90s. It was like a fox body but when they started making them look half decent. If I remember correctly they quit with the 5.0 after 95 or 96.Thanks for catching that!

red beast

95 was the last year.....

z28berryhill

iTrader: (26)

that will not happen often unless it was very modded ,my caR blew up during the race or it was supercharged soo no it dont make it worse for me at all

dont get me wrong **** i almost bought one
i respect them for sure but they are not fast unless you have work done to them

Stopsign32v

iTrader: (1)

I hate to bust it to you but no LS1 car is fast unless you do something to it.