Turbo Honda S2000 > Cam Ls1 TA**video**
09-29-2008, 02:20 PM
#1
Turbo Honda S2000 > Cam Ls1 TA**video** Went for some runs last night. S2K was turbo, i forget what kit, but it was a pretty big turbo when he popped the hood, he was 
about power #'s so i dont have that to report. He wanted to start at 45mph, which is kind of a dead spot in 2nd for me, but it worked well i guess because my tires are getting spanked.
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/T...LS1_187727.htm
check out those front brakes when hes brake boosting!
I would say this is one FAST S2K considering my track times and kill list.
to the s2k driver
about power #'s so i dont have that to report. He wanted to start at 45mph, which is kind of a dead spot in 2nd for me, but it worked well i guess because my tires are getting spanked.http://videos.streetfire.net/video/T...LS1_187727.htm
check out those front brakes when hes brake boosting!
I would say this is one FAST S2K considering my track times and kill list.
to the s2k driver 
Trending Topics
09-29-2008, 08:04 PM
#12
Village Idiot
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Santa Monica, California
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Beat by a friggn HONDA!!! That sucks... Rice Arony....
Knock on wood I have never lost to a honda and have raced some turbo'd ricers in my day... Had a real close one with an old boosted honda civic hatchback years back... FWD too... I just edged it out, thank god...
Knock on wood I have never lost to a honda and have raced some turbo'd ricers in my day... Had a real close one with an old boosted honda civic hatchback years back... FWD too... I just edged it out, thank god...
09-29-2008, 09:12 PM
#13
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm sure it'll happen one day.
09-29-2008, 10:56 PM
#17
No, not really. No Hondas are, they have super short gearing designed for 0-60 sprints and city driving, thats about it. A stock S2000 doesn't pull worth a damn on the top end, a high redline doesn't necessarily equal good top end power.
This particular example in this video obviously had better top end, seeing as it was turbocharged.
This particular example in this video obviously had better top end, seeing as it was turbocharged.
09-29-2008, 11:35 PM
#18
TECH Addict
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Simi Valley, CA.
Posts: 2,727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
^^^ Good point.
Not too bad though as far as gearing goes. I would say they are decent for FI applications w/ such a little car assuming they can use all 6 gears and handle 9Krpm +. They would be better if they used a taller tire or higher rear gear.
All these are at 9000rpm:
1st (3.133) 48.88 mph
2nd (2.045) 74.88 mph
3rd (1.481) 103.4 mph
4th (1.161) 131.9 mph
5th (0.970) 157.71 mph
6th (0.810) 188.82 mph
Final Drive 4.10 w/ a 23.44in. tire.
vs. M6 F-body @ 6000rpm
1st (2.66) 50mph
2nd (1.78) 75mph
3rd (1.30) 103mph
4th (1.00) 134mph
5th (0.78) 181mph
6th (.050) 268mph
Final Drive 3.42 w/ 25.66in. tire.
Not too bad though as far as gearing goes. I would say they are decent for FI applications w/ such a little car assuming they can use all 6 gears and handle 9Krpm +. They would be better if they used a taller tire or higher rear gear.
All these are at 9000rpm:
1st (3.133) 48.88 mph
2nd (2.045) 74.88 mph
3rd (1.481) 103.4 mph
4th (1.161) 131.9 mph
5th (0.970) 157.71 mph
6th (0.810) 188.82 mph
Final Drive 4.10 w/ a 23.44in. tire.
vs. M6 F-body @ 6000rpm
1st (2.66) 50mph
2nd (1.78) 75mph
3rd (1.30) 103mph
4th (1.00) 134mph
5th (0.78) 181mph
6th (.050) 268mph
Final Drive 3.42 w/ 25.66in. tire.
Last edited by djsanchez2; 09-29-2008 at 11:57 PM.
