Best Suspension Mod For Traction?
#1
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Deland, Florida
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Best Suspension Mod For Traction?
Aside from tires, on a stock ride height car, with what mod do you see the most improvement in straight-line traction? LCA's? Shocks? Subframe Connectors? ??
#6
i bought the adjustable because it lets you set your pinion angle and the different pinion angle depending on how modified your car is, can affect your launch, better or worse.
Trending Topics
#9
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (14)
Yeah I would say a torque arm. I would like to see a set of Relo brackets on a stock height car. I think they would help. Or a set of Lakewood LCA's. That have the extra bar so you can set a preload. I know they work wonder's on 1st gen Camaro's. Here's a link to what I'm talking about.
http://www.lmperformance.com/1689/1.html
http://www.lmperformance.com/1689/1.html
#10
sit back and take a look at your torque arm and the job it does in your suspension, look how its connected to everything and then you tell me if you think its worth it...
#13
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Deland, Florida
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So on a stock suspension car my money would be spent best on a Torque Arm first? I was thinking LCA's, but it seems the consensus is that a Torque Arm helps more. Eventually though I plan on having a Torque Arm, LCA's, Panhard, and shocks but can only do one at a time and right now I have wicked tire spin thru first.
#14
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sugar Land, TX
Posts: 2,485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
An anti-rear swab bar is the most important part of traction after tires.
Don't know how you guys can say a torque arm is more improtant than an anti-rear sway bar. You got to have a strong enough rear bar to keep the car level and both rear tires with same or almost same downward weight at launch.
If you don't believe this take your rear bar off and try launching.
Don't know how you guys can say a torque arm is more improtant than an anti-rear sway bar. You got to have a strong enough rear bar to keep the car level and both rear tires with same or almost same downward weight at launch.
If you don't believe this take your rear bar off and try launching.
#15
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sugar Land, TX
Posts: 2,485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jet_black
Everyone is forgetting !front sway bar. It helped me to the tune of .1 off of my 60", which equates to about .2 off of ET. And best of all, it's FREE.
Other than that, BMR LCA's and SFC's and a pair of ET Streets get me into the 1.9x's on a stock converter.
Other than that, BMR LCA's and SFC's and a pair of ET Streets get me into the 1.9x's on a stock converter.
Last edited by Larry; 04-18-2005 at 09:12 AM.
#16
11 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
Originally Posted by Larry
Front anti-sway bar? Don't think you car knows it has one after it leaves the ground. The rear bar is the key!
There are NO local guys running in the 11's with an F-Body who're running a front sway bar. Seems to be good enough proof for me that it works, not to mention my own gains.
#17
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sugar Land, TX
Posts: 2,485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jet_black
I never said a thing about touching the rear sway bar. It takes a lot more than most people have to pull the front wheels, and the author of this post never said anything about doing so, so the !front sway bar mod would be pretty good for him, as it would allow the front wheels to drop more, and more weight to transfer.
There are NO local guys running in the 11's with an F-Body who're running a front sway bar. Seems to be good enough proof for me that it works, not to mention my own gains.
There are NO local guys running in the 11's with an F-Body who're running a front sway bar. Seems to be good enough proof for me that it works, not to mention my own gains.
I thought you meant you needed it from your wording.
Last edited by Larry; 04-18-2005 at 02:37 PM.
#18
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
TQ arm?
rear sway bar?
duuh.. niether of thoes will have anything close to the same impact upon launch as QA1s.
bone stock rear suspension.. i mean stock TQ arm, stock LCAs, stock everything back there except tires.
and QA1s in front.
consistant 1.6 60s........ (if you have the power)
basicly, on a stock setup, your TQ arm is more then close enough.
the LCA control angle on a non lowered, non saggy spring car, is good.
the most important things you can do at that point is weight transfer.
basicly, dump the front sway bar, put QA1s on it, and stick some ETstreets under it.
rear sway bar?
duuh.. niether of thoes will have anything close to the same impact upon launch as QA1s.
bone stock rear suspension.. i mean stock TQ arm, stock LCAs, stock everything back there except tires.
and QA1s in front.
consistant 1.6 60s........ (if you have the power)
basicly, on a stock setup, your TQ arm is more then close enough.
the LCA control angle on a non lowered, non saggy spring car, is good.
the most important things you can do at that point is weight transfer.
basicly, dump the front sway bar, put QA1s on it, and stick some ETstreets under it.
#20
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
Originally Posted by 2kta--89formula
Which QA1's? There seem to be a hundred of them! Does it affect your ride height?
ride height is adjustible. you can raise or lower the front of the car with them.