Raced my first 2010 SS Camaro
04-03-2010, 09:01 PM
#21
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Brownsville, texas
Posts: 620
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
04-04-2010, 12:21 AM
#22
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Garland, Tx
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
These cars havnt been out that long and y'all are grunting victory with more time for modding your 4th gens?! To give u an idea those cars already went 9s and they havnt been off the showroom floors for over a year! In one more year they will be waaay quicker and not shrugged off like y'all do now.
You must've not read all the posts, only one post looked like it was what you described.
04-04-2010, 12:58 AM
#23
TECH Regular
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Alamo Heights, Texas
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Either way, it's still an LSx, it's not like going from an LT1 to an LS1, the LS series has been out for a long time, and all of them are very similar in modding.
04-04-2010, 01:08 AM
#24
Havent had a chance to run one yet, only have 2 in town... the only race ive had this year was a cocky kid in a brand new F150, lmao nothing to get excited about. Just had to put a spankin on him...
Although the outcome of a race against a new camaro is obvious with my car at over 600hp unless something went horrible wrong. Id sill like to see how good they run though!
Although the outcome of a race against a new camaro is obvious with my car at over 600hp unless something went horrible wrong. Id sill like to see how good they run though!
04-04-2010, 12:36 PM
#25
Here is a video of mine when it was 100% stock, only about 2 weeks old. I mean completely stock, down to the factory air pressure in the tires. You will also notice the video was from June, it was run mid-summer in the heat.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFjyi516k-o
I've owned numerous 4th gens: www.fquick.com/NineBall
The 5th gen is a quicker car stock vs stock, period. You guys might claim to win races, but that usually has 75% to do with driver or traction, unless the cars are completely unmatched in power levels.
The quicker some of you come out of denial that the fat porky obese 5th gen is a better and quicker car than the 4th gen, the more credibility you gain.
Not saying you can't beat them, just saying with equal mods and drivers the fatso Camaro wins. My '10 SS put down 400 rwhp with exhaust and a CAI. Not even a tune! It took heads/cam/bolt-ons/tune in the LS1 cars to do that.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFjyi516k-o
I've owned numerous 4th gens: www.fquick.com/NineBall
The 5th gen is a quicker car stock vs stock, period. You guys might claim to win races, but that usually has 75% to do with driver or traction, unless the cars are completely unmatched in power levels.
The quicker some of you come out of denial that the fat porky obese 5th gen is a better and quicker car than the 4th gen, the more credibility you gain.
Not saying you can't beat them, just saying with equal mods and drivers the fatso Camaro wins. My '10 SS put down 400 rwhp with exhaust and a CAI. Not even a tune! It took heads/cam/bolt-ons/tune in the LS1 cars to do that.
04-04-2010, 12:54 PM
#26
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Braunfels/Mission, TX
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here is a video of mine when it was 100% stock, only about 2 weeks old. I mean completely stock, down to the factory air pressure in the tires. You will also notice the video was from June, it was run mid-summer in the heat.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFjyi516k-o
I've owned numerous 4th gens: www.fquick.com/NineBall
The 5th gen is a quicker car stock vs stock, period. You guys might claim to win races, but that usually has 75% to do with driver or traction, unless the cars are completely unmatched in power levels.
The quicker some of you come out of denial that the fat porky obese 5th gen is a better and quicker car than the 4th gen, the more credibility you gain.
Not saying you can't beat them, just saying with equal mods and drivers the fatso Camaro wins. My '10 SS put down 400 rwhp with exhaust and a CAI. Not even a tune! It took heads/cam/bolt-ons/tune in the LS1 cars to do that.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFjyi516k-o
I've owned numerous 4th gens: www.fquick.com/NineBall
The 5th gen is a quicker car stock vs stock, period. You guys might claim to win races, but that usually has 75% to do with driver or traction, unless the cars are completely unmatched in power levels.
The quicker some of you come out of denial that the fat porky obese 5th gen is a better and quicker car than the 4th gen, the more credibility you gain.
Not saying you can't beat them, just saying with equal mods and drivers the fatso Camaro wins. My '10 SS put down 400 rwhp with exhaust and a CAI. Not even a tune! It took heads/cam/bolt-ons/tune in the LS1 cars to do that.
04-04-2010, 04:16 PM
#29
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Westside of TX
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here is a video of mine when it was 100% stock, only about 2 weeks old. I mean completely stock, down to the factory air pressure in the tires. You will also notice the video was from June, it was run mid-summer in the heat.
The 5th gen is a quicker car stock vs stock, period. You guys might claim to win races, but that usually has 75% to do with driver or traction, unless the cars are completely unmatched in power levels.
The quicker some of you come out of denial that the fat porky obese 5th gen is a better and quicker car than the 4th gen, the more credibility you gain.
Not saying you can't beat them, just saying with equal mods and drivers the fatso Camaro wins. My '10 SS put down 400 rwhp with exhaust and a CAI. Not even a tune! It took heads/cam/bolt-ons/tune in the LS1 cars to do that.
The 5th gen is a quicker car stock vs stock, period. You guys might claim to win races, but that usually has 75% to do with driver or traction, unless the cars are completely unmatched in power levels.
The quicker some of you come out of denial that the fat porky obese 5th gen is a better and quicker car than the 4th gen, the more credibility you gain.
Not saying you can't beat them, just saying with equal mods and drivers the fatso Camaro wins. My '10 SS put down 400 rwhp with exhaust and a CAI. Not even a tune! It took heads/cam/bolt-ons/tune in the LS1 cars to do that.
04-04-2010, 07:51 PM
#32
Here is a video of mine when it was 100% stock, only about 2 weeks old. I mean completely stock, down to the factory air pressure in the tires. You will also notice the video was from June, it was run mid-summer in the heat.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFjyi516k-o
I've owned numerous 4th gens: www.fquick.com/NineBall
The 5th gen is a quicker car stock vs stock, period. You guys might claim to win races, but that usually has 75% to do with driver or traction, unless the cars are completely unmatched in power levels.
The quicker some of you come out of denial that the fat porky obese 5th gen is a better and quicker car than the 4th gen, the more credibility you gain.
Not saying you can't beat them, just saying with equal mods and drivers the fatso Camaro wins. My '10 SS put down 400 rwhp with exhaust and a CAI. Not even a tune! It took heads/cam/bolt-ons/tune in the LS1 cars to do that.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFjyi516k-o
I've owned numerous 4th gens: www.fquick.com/NineBall
The 5th gen is a quicker car stock vs stock, period. You guys might claim to win races, but that usually has 75% to do with driver or traction, unless the cars are completely unmatched in power levels.
The quicker some of you come out of denial that the fat porky obese 5th gen is a better and quicker car than the 4th gen, the more credibility you gain.
Not saying you can't beat them, just saying with equal mods and drivers the fatso Camaro wins. My '10 SS put down 400 rwhp with exhaust and a CAI. Not even a tune! It took heads/cam/bolt-ons/tune in the LS1 cars to do that.
04-06-2010, 02:25 PM
#37
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2010 ss 13.0s stock is very impressive to me. The 02 -05 Z06 vettes had hell doing that with factory tires cuz they would blow the tires off with the standard. Buddy has a 03 Z06 and he got a 12.75 out of it stock but that was once in 10 passes with a perfect launch...the rest of the time it spun the tires or clutch LOL and ran 12.90 - 13.40. The z06 pulled hard but its 1,000 lbs lighter.
That el-camino probably had a Rat Motor in it,,,,
That el-camino probably had a Rat Motor in it,,,,
