Stock LT1 specs
#5
Launching!
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: New Ulm, MInnesota
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i have pretty much full bolt ons and make 290ish to the wheels.my buddy dynoed his 97 Z28 with an SLP catback and GM free mods and it made like 259rwhp through an a4...it only had 67k miles on it so that should be a good indicator
#6
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: long island new york
Posts: 1,420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
isnt that for a corvette?
cause if im making over 300 rwhp with a cai and a catback, and headers and whatnot ill be pretty happy.
doubt it but ill be happy
cause if im making over 300 rwhp with a cai and a catback, and headers and whatnot ill be pretty happy.
doubt it but ill be happy
Trending Topics
#13
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Eating rice, Cal
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What you mean to say is brake horse power, (BHP), is the rating at the crank, and all years and set ups did not make the same power from what I have seen and been told. The other term you are looking for is "static coeffence drivetrain loss", means power lossed through the tranny, driveshaft and rear end. That and M6 has a smaller static coeffence drivetrain loss than an auto, mostly due to the tq converter, and the link that you gave does not say what year that and set up that rating is for, I know that they changed parts from '93-'97, and I never heard a '93-'97 F-body with a 300 BHP rating without the "Ram Air" or "SS" version, but if the vett version then maybe 300 BHP, so there is many vairabails to the rating of the LT-1 so...........
#15
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (31)
What you mean to say is brake horse power, (BHP), is the rating at the crank, and all years and set ups did not make the same power from what I have seen and been told. The other term you are looking for is "static coeffence drivetrain loss", means power lossed through the tranny, driveshaft and rear end. That and M6 has a smaller static coeffence drivetrain loss than an auto, mostly due to the tq converter, and the link that you gave does not say what year that and set up that rating is for, I know that they changed parts from '93-'97, and I never heard a '93-'97 F-body with a 300 BHP rating without the "Ram Air" or "SS" version, but if the vett version then maybe 300 BHP, so there is many vairabails to the rating of the LT-1 so...........
the year is for 96.i used it for a reference!
ok,dyno your car if it is stock and running the way it should you will get numbers very close to the factory rated numbers.
#17
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (31)
is your car tuned up,plugs,wires,fuel filter,good injectors,good fuel pump,pressure reg in perfect order?
you should not be disappointed at all in fact quite a few 94s are faster than a majotiry (93-97)my buddies 94 was ALWAYS 2 tenths faster than my car we even swapped drivers...
you should not be disappointed at all in fact quite a few 94s are faster than a majotiry (93-97)my buddies 94 was ALWAYS 2 tenths faster than my car we even swapped drivers...