Cadillac CTS-V 2004-2007 (Gen I) The Caddy with an Attitude...

Cam install next week-- guess what she'll make

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-02-2013, 08:25 PM
  #1  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
DACTARI's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 801
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default Cam install next week-- guess what she'll make

Car is an 06 with LS2, 1 7/8 headers, hi-flow cats, stock pipes with magnaflow straight-thru muffs. Also has an ATI Super Damper and Lingenfelter air box with home-made 4 inch pipe w/reducer to stock MAF. Everything else is stock.

I sat down with my tuner Jeff Lowry and went over all the details of my car and how I use it. Since I feel like the car already has enough torque down low to break traction on demand, we went for a cam that gives strong mid range and top end, without sacrificing down low. The cam should start to pull around 2500-3000 RPM. We will also raise the limiter to about 6800-7000 (final limit to be determined during the tune).

The cam specs are 228/236 111+3. He specced moderate lift lobes (.595/.598) that would be kind to the valvetrain and promote valvetrain stability that would result in more stability at high RPM, and therefore more high RPM power and reliability.

Install and dyno will be next week. So, let's have some guesses on max TQ and HP? Where in the rev band do you think she'll peak HP and TQ?

Planned mods within the next two years are so are trick flow heads and FAST 102. Cam was specced with these in mind.
Old 06-02-2013, 09:50 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
RADEoN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Harrison City, PA
Posts: 1,695
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

417/420
Old 06-02-2013, 09:52 PM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
itsslow98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,768
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Stock ls2 intake or ported? If not port it........Im gonna say 410-415hp/385tq. Im saying peak will be 6k with the stock intake.
Old 06-02-2013, 09:56 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
RADEoN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Harrison City, PA
Posts: 1,695
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

those cams make big torque even through stock heads, i'd be shocked if he was that far under 400 rwtq.
Old 06-02-2013, 10:04 PM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
itsslow98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,768
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Guess we'll see next week.........
Old 06-02-2013, 10:17 PM
  #6  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
adanieljohnson1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Frisco, TX
Posts: 2,742
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

418whp & 413wtq
Old 06-02-2013, 10:17 PM
  #7  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
DACTARI's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 801
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by itsslow98
Stock ls2 intake or ported? If not port it........Im gonna say 410-415hp/385tq. Im saying peak will be 6k with the stock intake.
Stock intake. I know it's *****. Don't want to pay to have it ported, as I know I'll be going to a FAST eventually.
Old 06-02-2013, 11:41 PM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
itsslow98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,768
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

What did you make as it sits now?
Old 06-03-2013, 06:23 AM
  #9  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
DACTARI's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 801
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Funny story (can say it's "funny" now cause he's back in operation)-- Jeff's shop burned down shortly after my dyno tune so I never got the printout and at the time I was too excited to snap a picture of the screen. I recall it was something like 375/385 Tq/HP on a Mustang, much stronger than we expected.

At any rate te first run would have been useless as a baseline because that dyno is now a melted hunk of metal. We will ne dyno tuning at friend's dyno.
Old 06-03-2013, 09:36 PM
  #10  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
itsslow98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,768
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Ill say youd pick up around 10-15ft/lbs but who knows what that will be sicne its on a different dyno.
Old 06-04-2013, 08:03 AM
  #11  
TECH Regular
 
DarkCharisma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Utah
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Did you swap springs with that cam?
Old 06-04-2013, 08:06 AM
  #12  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
DACTARI's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 801
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Yes, she will get new springs, retainers and pushrods.
Old 06-04-2013, 08:58 AM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
punishmentcycle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: CT
Posts: 1,681
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

low 400's with a much better curve
Old 06-04-2013, 09:12 AM
  #14  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
DACTARI's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 801
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by punishmentcycle
low 400's with a much better curve
Bro-hug-- that's what I'm hoping for.

OK guys, I fabbed up a 4" CAI tube (90 degree 4" elbow to 4" Al tube to 4" to 3.5" reducer), but I can't make it fit. There just doesn't seem to be enough room between the PS pulley and radiator. Any tips?
Old 06-04-2013, 09:46 AM
  #15  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
DACTARI's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 801
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I recall some people posting saying there was a method for tilting the radiator slightly to gain more clearance for a 4" tube. Apparently, it's easy. However, I can't find those posts for the life of me. I'm searchtarded today, apparently.
Old 06-04-2013, 10:17 AM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
punishmentcycle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: CT
Posts: 1,681
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by DACTARI
I recall some people posting saying there was a method for tilting the radiator slightly to gain more clearance for a 4" tube. Apparently, it's easy. However, I can't find those posts for the life of me. I'm searchtarded today, apparently.
i think in remember it was just removing the upper mounts and making longer ones to push the rad forward...personally id stick with a 3.5 pipe..plenty of air volume and no reducer to disrupt air flow
Old 06-04-2013, 10:22 AM
  #17  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
DACTARI's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 801
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by punishmentcycle
i think in remember it was just removing the upper mounts and making longer ones to push the rad forward...personally id stick with a 3.5 pipe..plenty of air volume and no reducer to disrupt air flow
Well, damn I am already invested in this 4" pipe and not much time before I drop the car off tomorrow. I could see maybe drilling new holes in the mounts and pulling the rad backward.
Old 06-04-2013, 10:42 AM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
punishmentcycle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: CT
Posts: 1,681
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by DACTARI
Well, damn I am already invested in this 4" pipe and not much time before I drop the car off tomorrow. I could see maybe drilling new holes in the mounts and pulling the rad backward.
if u pull it "backwards" (towards the motor) your gonna negate the reason for the mod..youll lose clearance. make a couple brackets that are longer and push the rad towards the front. u might be able to lean it back and run the tube sort of over the top but i think youll run into hood issues.
Old 06-04-2013, 10:45 AM
  #19  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
DACTARI's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 801
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by punishmentcycle
if u pull it "backwards" (towards the motor) your gonna negate the reason for the mod..youll lose clearance. make a couple brackets that are longer and push the rad towards the front. u might be able to lean it back and run the tube sort of over the top but i think youll run into hood issues.
Oh, I get you. I meant backwards, as in towards me as I'm facing the car with the hood up. I may or may not do this... running out of time.
Old 06-04-2013, 11:58 AM
  #20  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (4)
 
FuzzyLog1c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,305
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

I think the type of 90 degree coupler you use can have a lot to do with whether you'll have clearance problems with a 4" intake tube. My straight tube has an outer diameter of about 4.5" and I'm not having clearance issues because the 90 degree coupler can flex slightly to give me that perfect angle to the airbox.


Quick Reply: Cam install next week-- guess what she'll make



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:01 PM.