Cadillac CTS-V 2004-2007 (Gen I) The Caddy with an Attitude...

Do we need subframe connectors

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-12-2014, 09:44 PM
  #41  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
54inches's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Cove, Texas
Posts: 2,064
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Agree 100%.
Old 10-13-2014, 08:17 AM
  #42  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Sssnake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

but the clunk in the newest diff is horrid.
Just for clarity, you are experiencing clunk with the 8.8" diff (yes/no)?

If so, that is disheartening.
Old 10-13-2014, 10:49 AM
  #43  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
bmylez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Pretty sure he means the gen IV diff. The clunk has everything to do with gear backlash. It was initially thought that diff bushings and trans mounts would cure it, but you can't cure an internal problem like that.
Old 10-13-2014, 11:06 AM
  #44  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Sssnake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Pretty sure he means the gen IV diff. The clunk has everything to do with gear backlash. It was initially thought that diff bushings and trans mounts would cure it, but you can't cure an internal problem like that.
Thanks I am very aware of all of the issues with our drivelines. I am just wondering if there have been issues with the 8.8". The way 54 worded his post it was unclear (especially since I know he is running an 8.8" or at least I sure thought he was).
Old 10-13-2014, 11:38 AM
  #45  
TECH Fanatic
 
ryridesmotox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Wildomar, CA
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Im pretty sure he is testing the "sub frame connectors" on a stock differential.
Old 10-13-2014, 09:34 PM
  #46  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
54inches's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Cove, Texas
Posts: 2,064
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

My apologies....as soon as I get the 8.8 installed I will update my signature....lol.

But seriously, I am on my 2nd stock diff......
Old 10-14-2014, 02:38 PM
  #47  
TECH Enthusiast
 
Sssnake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

No problems, from previous posts I thought you had already swapped over. Speaking of the 8.8" you have mail
Old 10-15-2014, 12:56 AM
  #48  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
54inches's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Cove, Texas
Posts: 2,064
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Car one is in my sig.....
Car 2 is GulfM3's which is a Heads and Cam TT with an 8.8......
Old 11-21-2015, 06:39 PM
  #49  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
ls1247's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Greenville SC
Posts: 2,413
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

A year later, I've come to the conclusion that the v1 can benefit from some sort of frame reinforcement. The biggest problem is wheel hop but after seeing several wrecked cars getting totaled because the roof and rear quarters buckled when hit in the rear, I went looking for a weak spot. Laygo's car folded like a wet noodle when it got rear ended and other than the buckling, that car looked like an easy fix. Other than that, this car can be a pain in the *** to jack up and there aren't many places to put jack stands either so I made not only some "traction bars" but some "rocker supports" as well.

After looking at the floor pan, it seems to me that the weakest point is going to be where the fuel tank well meets the floor pan. To help support this area, I made a full length rocker support that is plated to pick up the 3 threaded holes just ahead of the rear wheel well. These rear plates are long enough to span over the seam at the fuel tank well/floor pan. I could have stopped there but no, the rocker supports run the length of the car and pick up the large flat surface that spans between the frame rail and rocker at the front of the car. As these shouldn't need to be removed for any reason, I plan on taking them to the local muffler shop where the guys have agreed to weld them to the car if I can get them hung. There is a support in the middle of the span that can be welded into the hollow rocker without having to worry too much about setting the carpet on fire and then again at the before mentioned flat at the front of the car. I will suspend these temporarily with some self tappers so I can get it to the muffler shop. The 1x1 tucks in nicely and you can barely see them sticking below the folded rocker lip.

The traction bars are bolted to a piece of 3x3x3/16 angle that bolts to the forward trailing arm mount on the cradle. Because this surface isn't level with the bottom of the car, I back cut the angle a little and bent it down so I could butt up against it at a 90 and then welded it. I plan on having this 3x3 tack welded onto the cradle just because but the traction bars bolt to it there as well as the frame rail up front so they can be removed for servicing. I left a 1/4 gap between the cradle mount and the bar by "washering up" so I could squeeze a piece of urethane in there to help combat any noise transmission. I have about 3/4" clearance between the cradle mount and the gas tank after I trimmed the mount and maybe 1/2" to the floorpan in general, maybe less.

From there, I carried the bar 52 inches forward so that it spans the trans crossmember mounting point because it seemed logical. I used 3 bolts up front because its better than 2. The bars are flush to the bottom of the frame rail so that I could drill through holes without having to worry about hitting the hardlines mounted on the inside of the passenger side frame rail. The holes are a little off center of the trans crossmember bolt so I could drill through the frame rail without hitting the bolt.

The pictures show a roughed in assembly so there will be some trimming, paint and sized bolts before the final install but the holes are all drilled and I feel pretty good about it.

I used a .120 1x1 because that what seems to be speced by BMR etc and all the plating is in 3/16 because again, that seems to be what everyone else specs for this application.

Yes, this is a bit hackish because I'm working on jack stands so the quality of these would be considered prototyping at best. But, they'll work so I probably won't bother trying to improve them any unless I have some sort of problems. I won't be driving the car for a week or so so no final results are in but I'm not expecting any drastic improvements other than diminished wheel hop, protection for the "crumple zone" and an easy place to jack and support the car while I work on it.

This was inspired by various others who came before me so thanks to all who contributed....

Failed project alert...if you notice one of the pics shows a v2 strut tower brace I got cheap and was hoping to hack it up and put it on the car but that ain't happening. In other words, I have a cheap v2 strut tower brace if anybody is interested.

EDIT: The traction bars don't seem to hang any lower than the resonator/stock exhaust crossover but I've got an 8.8 so the pipes hang a little lower than stock. The way they're made, they should slide off any sharp edges I may eventually catch. I'll take more pictures at the muffler shop if any one is interested. I'm guessing all this weighs about 60lbs...OK maybe 70.
Attached Thumbnails Do we need subframe connectors-outer.jpg   Do we need subframe connectors-traction.jpg   Do we need subframe connectors-traction2.jpg   Do we need subframe connectors-traction3.jpg  

Last edited by ls1247; 11-21-2015 at 08:21 PM.
Old 11-21-2015, 10:20 PM
  #50  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
54inches's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Cove, Texas
Posts: 2,064
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

I think you might be thinking about this wrong.

ANY car can suffer from wheel-hop and you will not make it go away in any car.

I have tried in many cars to get the rear to hop and it is fairly easy.

My car is more rigid with the SFCs and when I jack it up one one corner the corresponding side goes up as well, so yes they help.

You are on the right track, but a little overkill.
Old 11-22-2015, 07:44 AM
  #51  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
ls1247's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Greenville SC
Posts: 2,413
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 54inches
I have tried in many cars to get the rear to hop and it is fairly easy.
I've owned several cars that never hopped at all but they weren't really getting traction either!

Originally Posted by 54inches
My car is more rigid with the SFCs and when I jack it up one one corner the corresponding side goes up as well, so yes they help.
I could jack the car up on the front of the frame rail and the entire side of the car would eventually come off the ground when it was stock. The car seems to be stiff enough under normal situations but when it's hit in the rear, it seems to have a problem in my mind as witnessed by the hand full of totals I've seen with buckled roofs and quarters.

Originally Posted by 54inches
You are on the right track, but a little overkill.
I work for a German engineering firm so yes, I'm sure its overkill. The rocker bars are probably excess baggage to some degree but having the extra collision insurance and having a good place to put a jack stand meant that I felt it was an acceptable application of overkill.

The traction bars are a simplified version of what you had designed as it only attaches at one point on the cradle instead of 2. I never really saw the point in that although your design influenced mine...Thanks!!

I've never designed or built a set of chassis braces before but after owning and working on F-bodies and Fox bodied Mustangs, I haven't departed greatly from what I've seen in practice. If there's a better way of building something like this, I'm all ears!

EDIT - I was hoping, based on these threads, that firmly attaching the cradle to the car would keep it from moving around.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/cadillac-...2005-ctsv.html

How have yours been working? I guess your account data limit has been reached but I wish you could put some pictures back up of your original designs.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/cadillac-...me-mounts.html

Talk about simplicity! I plan on keeping the car so I felt it deserved a little more effort than that but this is, again, testimonial evidence that securing the cradle at the front trailing arm mount is a viable way of eliminating wheel hop on this platform.

Last edited by ls1247; 11-22-2015 at 07:57 AM.
Old 11-22-2015, 10:03 AM
  #52  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (19)
 
AAIIIC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Where the Navy tells me to go
Posts: 2,408
Received 107 Likes on 89 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

Originally Posted by ls1247
I could jack the car up on the front of the frame rail and the entire side of the car would eventually come off the ground when it was stock.
I typically jack the car from the front corner, too, and you can get both tires on one side off the ground. However, if you open and shut the front door while you have it jacked up like that, you can definitely hear that there's some flex in the chassis - the door doesn't quite hit the latch right, and you can hear the sound isn't as solid.

The chassis is definitely stronger than my other 2 cars, but there's still room for improvement with the rocker reinforcements.
Old 11-22-2015, 07:06 PM
  #53  
TECH Regular
 
rjoffe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 466
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

ls1247, Happen to weigh your solution ?
Old 11-22-2015, 07:50 PM
  #54  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
ls1247's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Greenville SC
Posts: 2,413
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

I'm thinking 60 lbs for all of it
Old 11-30-2015, 02:04 PM
  #55  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
54inches's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Cove, Texas
Posts: 2,064
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

HOLY FN Shiite!

When I jack my car up, it is even, not "eventually".

I cannot guarantee that the subframe does not move, but it is much better.

Still have hop in the rain with 275s.

There is one guy that welded his subframe TO the frame and claimed ALL wheel hop was gone.
Old 11-30-2015, 04:19 PM
  #56  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
ls1247's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Greenville SC
Posts: 2,413
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

I linked above to the post where the guy simply welded a plate to the car and it worked. I'm reworking them a little now so we'll see what happens!
Old 12-01-2015, 10:35 AM
  #57  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
BudRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Dunwoody, GA
Posts: 3,544
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ls1247
The traction bars are a simplified version of what you had designed as it only attaches at one point on the cradle instead of 2. I never really saw the point in that although your design influenced mine...
I thought it was pretty clear that the 2nd mounting point on the cradle was to keep it from torquing under acceleration.
Old 12-01-2015, 11:09 AM
  #58  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
ls1247's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Greenville SC
Posts: 2,413
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 54inches
Still have hop in the rain with 275s.

There is one guy that welded his subframe TO the frame and claimed ALL wheel hop was gone.
I thought that too but after thinking about it and after reading where that one guy just welded a plate at one point in the front, bent it over and welded it to the rocker, I didn't see the point in 2 mounting points on the cradle. But, after all, it is the internet so you don't know if that guy was BSing or not.

The biggest challenge I'm running into is not being able to weld underneath the car. I have to dimension it, unbolt it and carry it somewhere else to have it welded. It'd be a lot easier, and way more effective I'm thinking, if I could just bolt my plates/fixtures in and weld the tubing to it all at the same time. It would be a much tighter fit than what I'm able to achieve right now and while I could just have it all welded in, I really don't want to do that if I can get a tight enough fit as a bolt in.

After looking at it again, I found a threaded hole in the bottom side of the frame rail just forward of the transmission crossmember. If you made a plate to catch that hole and the hole for the trans crossmember, another plate to catch the 3 holes just forward of the rear tire, made your fixture for the front trailing arm mount on the cradle, you could just tack weld the tubing to tie these 3 points together with all of it still bolted into the car but I don't have that luxury.

I don't see how the cradle could move if you triangulated all this but I'm open for suggestions if anyone has any. Got to do something cause the wheel hop just isn't going to work.
Old 12-01-2015, 01:36 PM
  #59  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
BudRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Dunwoody, GA
Posts: 3,544
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Could you not get your plates all together and take it to a mom n pop muffler shop and ask them to spot weld it while on a lift for some cash? I would imagine that wouldn't take too much coin.
Old 12-01-2015, 03:33 PM
  #60  
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
ls1247's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Greenville SC
Posts: 2,413
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

The guys I use stay pretty busy and I've called in enough favors over there. I may be able to borrow a Lincoln "Home Depot" 110v off someone to tack it together.


Quick Reply: Do we need subframe connectors



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:22 PM.