Carbureted LSX Forum Carburetors | Carbed Intakes | Carb Tuning Tips for LSX Enthusiasts
View Poll Results: et predictions? I am goinf out Saturday. Temp will be highs in 60s, lows in 40s.
a-5.9? or , b - 6.0s
2
66.67%
c-6 teens d- 6.2s
1
33.33%
Voters: 3. You may not vote on this poll

new build....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-12-2016, 04:41 AM
  #21  
10 Second Club
 
Doug G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Harford Co. Maryland
Posts: 4,331
Received 129 Likes on 116 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

Originally Posted by fast89stang
I might tend to agree if it was a max effort deal. But I'm willing to put money in this thing being quicker. The weight loss, compression gain and cubes, even tho it's only 12 cubic inches, will be quicker.the valves will be unshrouded, which so many have said is a problem with Ls3 heads on a 6.0. Although it's not much, I don't see how 065 can help unshroud the valves much. Lol
.0325 per side. even less.
Old 10-12-2016, 09:05 AM
  #22  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
fast89stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hardin ky
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Doug G
.0325 per side. even less.
Yeah right. That's what puzzles me, when the say the valve is shrouded too much in a 6.0. I guess it could be true, it just doesn't seem like it could help much. But Im just a mechanic, not a physics major. LOL Or whatever studies that stuff.
Old 10-12-2016, 09:33 AM
  #23  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
crossbreed383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by speedtigger
Say wut?
What part didn't you understand Steve???
The OEM aluminum block doesn't seal up as well as its iron counterpart.
Old 10-12-2016, 10:47 AM
  #24  
Old School Heavy
iTrader: (16)
 
speedtigger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 8,830
Received 68 Likes on 39 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by crossbreed383
What part didn't you understand Steve???
The OEM aluminum block doesn't seal up as well as its iron counterpart.
It is the sense of proportion that is the problem for me.

Lets say that we accept the idea as true that the bores are more rigid and stable in the iron block. The question then becomes how much right? How much more power would sneak past the rings of an LS3 block versus an LQ4 block?

Then we have to consider how that compares to 12 more cubic inches, valve unshrouding, 100 pounds of weight loss and the .32:1 extra compression that he gets with the LS3.

The extra displacement is worth about 19-20 horsepower at 1.65 hp/ci. The hundred pounds is the equivalent of 10-15 HP at his power to weight ratio? The unshrouding and a few horsepower for the extra compression too.

So, you would be suggesting that 35-40 horsepower or so will be leaking past the rings on his LS3?

I like the math for the LS3 myself.
Old 10-12-2016, 10:55 AM
  #25  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
crossbreed383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Just a thought here Steve...
You have gone out of your way to to amass a list of the fastest SBE cars and what they run or seem to make for powe.r
Of the fastest cars YOU have claimed see to make in your words, extra ordinary power, i believe they were/are all 6.0 iron block combos????
Hmm..............
I'm not saying his car wont run faster, i just don't put the same merit in the 12 cubes, and shrouding problem that you are is all

Hell look at your heads, they seem to work on a small bore just fine
Old 10-12-2016, 11:04 AM
  #26  
Old School Heavy
iTrader: (16)
 
speedtigger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 8,830
Received 68 Likes on 39 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by crossbreed383
I'm not saying his car wont run faster, i just don't put the same merit in the 12 cubes, and shrouding problem that you are is all
And 100 pounds weight loss and more compression. Although, I did forget to include the fact that the aluminum block will expand and lose about .004" in quench when the block gets warm. So, only about a 1/4 point of additional compression after you back that out.

Have you seen evidence that the LQ4 iron block's cylinder seal up better than the LS3? I don't doubt that is the case, I just haven't seen any tests on that.
Old 10-12-2016, 11:42 AM
  #27  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
crossbreed383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post

Default

I know with my own stuff the difference in oil I was/am getting out of breather tank compared between alum alloy and iron block
Also some other little things I have noticed that I feel are contributed to a better ring seal IMO
Old 10-12-2016, 12:14 PM
  #28  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
fast89stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hardin ky
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

old motor was 9.6 stock compression, with heads milled .020, this motor stock is 10.5 and the heads will be milled 050. I am just hoping the suspension is more forgiving with the weight off the nose. The car is working pretty good, but this cant hurt. I will keep you all posted. The heads I am hoping will be done today. Maybe I can get pistons notched and heads assembled to get this thing put in this weekend. If so, we will probably have it out next weekend.
Old 10-12-2016, 02:02 PM
  #29  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
crossbreed383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by fast89stang
old motor was 9.6 stock compression, with heads milled .020, this motor stock is 10.5 and the heads will be milled 050. I am just hoping the suspension is more forgiving with the weight off the nose. The car is working pretty good, but this cant hurt. I will keep you all posted. The heads I am hoping will be done today. Maybe I can get pistons notched and heads assembled to get this thing put in this weekend. If so, we will probably have it out next weekend.
When I went with my Ls3 block I def noticed the car was more forgiving on certain tracks, but I regret not working on car more with the iron engine as I felt it made more power !!!
You may have to take some spring rate out of the frt end as well if its a coil over setup?
Old 10-12-2016, 02:18 PM
  #30  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
fast89stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hardin ky
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by crossbreed383
When I went with my Ls3 block I def noticed the car was more forgiving on certain tracks, but I regret not working on car more with the iron engine as I felt it made more power !!!
You may have to take some spring rate out of the frt end as well if its a coil over setup?
I actually have 14x130s on front now, maybe they will work ok with the aluminum block.
Old 10-12-2016, 02:19 PM
  #31  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
fast89stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hardin ky
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Doug G
.0325 per side. even less.
Doug, do you remember what length pushrods you have? Part number on intake gaskets?
Old 10-12-2016, 02:37 PM
  #32  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
crossbreed383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by fast89stang
I actually have 14x130s on front now, maybe they will work ok with the aluminum block.
I had 14-140s and went to 110s to get it to work right
Old 10-12-2016, 02:44 PM
  #33  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
fast89stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hardin ky
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by crossbreed383
I had 14-140s and went to 110s to get it to work right
Great, just what I needed...more suspension work. lol Machine shop thought I was nuts for milling .050. They charged me as such too. 175.00 to mill my heads. They said I killed the heads.....
Old 10-12-2016, 02:46 PM
  #34  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
fast89stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hardin ky
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Wonder how bad port alignment will be off on intake? Or is it crappy enough with the vic jr to not be worried?
Old 10-12-2016, 03:03 PM
  #35  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
crossbreed383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post

Default

My heads are milled .035 and alignment with a Supervic is horrible.
Would need to mill intake and run no gasket to get it close
Old 10-12-2016, 03:36 PM
  #36  
Old School Heavy
iTrader: (16)
 
speedtigger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 8,830
Received 68 Likes on 39 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by crossbreed383
I know with my own stuff the difference in oil I was/am getting out of breather tank compared between alum alloy and iron block
Also some other little things I have noticed that I feel are contributed to a better ring seal IMO
Interesting. Were they both the same displacement and power level? Did they both have the windows in the main webs?
Old 10-12-2016, 04:00 PM
  #37  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
crossbreed383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by speedtigger
Interesting. Were they both the same displacement and power level? Did they both have the windows in the main webs?
I have had a factory 04 Lq4 block , a 2012 ish( bought new so I assumed it wasn't too old) LS3 block - 408-416 cubes-same everything within about 30-35 hp-same stroke,OIL PAN,TRAY, piston ring pack,etc

And current 09' Ly6 iron block-makes about 40-45hp more on Nitrous than old N/A combos did up here

Last edited by crossbreed383; 10-12-2016 at 04:05 PM.
Old 10-12-2016, 07:14 PM
  #38  
10 Second Club
 
Doug G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Harford Co. Maryland
Posts: 4,331
Received 129 Likes on 116 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

Originally Posted by fast89stang
Doug, do you remember what length pushrods you have? Part number on intake gaskets?
7.250 (with stock .051 gasket, LS7 lifters) and not off the top of my head.

Did a little search....HERE THEY ARE.

Last edited by Doug G; 10-12-2016 at 07:22 PM.
Old 10-12-2016, 07:51 PM
  #39  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
fast89stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hardin ky
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Doug G
7.250 (with stock .051 gasket, LS7 lifters) and not off the top of my head.

Did a little search....HERE THEY ARE.
well crap. I wish I wouldn't have milled do much then. I hate to order New push rods. I know mine could be different, but I hate figuring out what you need. Lol
Old 10-17-2016, 11:53 AM
  #40  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
fast89stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hardin ky
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Turns out I had 7.350 pushrods in my old motor, they was a little off in my preload, but I thought I would try them. preload was at .043. Motor sounds good. It sounds a bit more powerful, and during the drive, it pulls hard. I didn't turn on the shift light, but when you mash it, it goes! It seems you can tell there is less weight on the nose, it just feels different. It does seem like I will need to change coil over springs in the front. The front feels like it did with iron block and 14x175s with the current aluminum block and 14x130s. But we should have some time slips to see this week.


Quick Reply: new build....



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:45 PM.