Drag Racing Tech
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Drag slick comparison

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-17-2008, 04:32 PM
  #1  
DBN
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
DBN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Drag slick comparison

Has anyone switched from Hoosier 28x10x15 or M/T ET Drag 28x10x15 to M/T ET Drag 28x10.5Wx15? If so, how much better did the 10.5W tires hook up?
Old 10-18-2008, 11:01 AM
  #2  
TECH Apprentice
 
BadBoo79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

When I went from a 28x10.5 and 29x10.5 to a W tire, I found that I gained consistency in the 60' times but did not actually see any better 60's.

If you can fit it, I would go with the Hooiser 29x10.5W since the extra diameter will give a little better traction over a 28", while the stiff construction will make the sidewalls last longer than an M/T.

I have been able to run my Hoosiers tubeless with little pressure loss where the M/T's went flat the next day.

Last edited by BadBoo79; 10-18-2008 at 01:19 PM.
Old 10-18-2008, 12:00 PM
  #3  
DBN
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
DBN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Drag slick comparison

Originally Posted by BadBoo79
When I went from a 28x10.5 and 29x10.5 to a W tire, I found that I gained consistency in the 60' times and did not actually see any better 60's.

If you can fit it, I would go with the Hooiser 29x10.5W since the extra diameter will give a little better traction over a 28", while the stiff construction will make the sidewalls last longer than an M/T.

I have been able to run my Hoosiers tubeless with little pressure loss where the M/T's went flat the next day.
Thanks. Good info to know. Anyone else?
Old 10-18-2008, 12:22 PM
  #4  
6 & 8 Second Club
 
mrdragster1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Illinois, RT 66 dragway area
Posts: 2,284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

.

I tested the MT & Hoo 29 X 10. Both inconsistant, both had short life. Had plenty of rubber left,
just stopped working & ate up sidewall. Started using Hoo 29 X 10.5W. Much less aborted runs, &
started getting 20-25 pass' if I rotated every 5 pass'. Best 60' the car ever had, even with smaller engine.
Good luck.

.
Old 10-18-2008, 01:19 PM
  #5  
TECH Apprentice
 
BadBoo79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mrdragster1970
.

I tested the MT & Hoo 29 X 10. Both inconsistant, both had short life. Had plenty of rubber left,
just stopped working & ate up sidewall. Started using Hoo 29 X 10.5W. Much less aborted runs, &
started getting 20-25 pass' if I rotated every 5 pass'. Best 60' the car ever had, even with smaller engine.
Good luck.

.

I called both Hoosier and M/T about the sidewall issue. Hoosier told me to go to a 28x10.5 Stiff if I was killing their 29x10.5W's while M/T said to run their 29.5x10.5 Stiff with a tube.

Although the Hooiser W's are a "stiff" tire where a M/T is not, they are not as stiff as the 28's, which was explained as a result of both the construction and the shorter sidewall.

I may try the 28's though since the 29.5's would rub (diameter wise) and I don't want to run tubes.



Quick Reply: Drag slick comparison



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:56 PM.