12.50 @ 114 car puts down 308? 11.5@ 125.5 puts down 376 - LS1TECH

Go Back   LS1TECH > LS1-LS2-LS3-LS6-LS7 PERFORMANCE > Dynamometer Results & Comparisons
Log In 
Search


Dynamometer Results & Comparisons
Dyno Records | Dyno Discussion | Dyno Wars


12.50 @ 114 car puts down 308? 11.5@ 125.5 puts down 376

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-07-2005, 10:11 PM   #1
11 Second Club
 
Tiger2o69's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 16
Join Date: May 2004
Location: MS
Posts: 2,221
Send a message via AIM to Tiger2o69 Send a message via MSN to Tiger2o69
Default 12.50 @ 114 car puts down 308? 11.5@ 125.5 puts down 376

Click the image to open in full size.


Possible? Any idea what my inj. pulse rate should be? It was at mid 22-23... I think I was really really rich...

times are not a fluke think i have ran very close more than several times...

Just trying to figure out if this is just possible or was there something wrong w/ my tune.
__________________
2002 Turbo A4
Tiger2o69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2005, 10:11 PM   #2
11 Second Club
 
Tiger2o69's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 16
Join Date: May 2004
Location: MS
Posts: 2,221
Send a message via AIM to Tiger2o69 Send a message via MSN to Tiger2o69
Default

2002 A4 Z28

Magnaflow Exhaust/K&N filter/Free Mods/LS6 Block/NGK TR55 Plugs/3.42 Gears/Clear MTI Lid/Porter TB/Aluminum D.S/Smooth Bellow/ M/T ET Streets/ Flowtechs Headers/ FLowtech ORY/HP Tuners/160* Hyperstat/Lower control arms/relocation brackets/TnT Nitrous
Ram Air II Hood/C5 Rims/Nitto 555E Tires


1/4- 12.50 @ 114...60'-1.97 (street tires)........ TnT 11.5@ 125.5 60'-1.89 (m/t)
1/8- 8.05@ 92.5 (street tires)........................ TnT 7.52@ 97.9 same run
__________________
2002 Turbo A4
Tiger2o69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2005, 04:42 AM   #3
TECH Resident
 
LS1SS4ever's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 973
Send a message via MSN to LS1SS4ever
Default

great time, with cam and ratio u will get better
__________________
Mustang Fox Body LX LS1
"The Right engine in the Right car"
http://www.cardomain.com/id/Saad94
LS1SS4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2005, 01:26 PM   #4
TECH Junkie
 
Turo's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 23
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 3,467
Send a message via AIM to Turo
Default

i dont know man, i say dyno again. those dyno numbers just seem WAY too low for the times you're running, unless your car is really really light.
__________________
2001 Z28 (slow)
Turo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2005, 02:01 PM   #5
11 Second Club
 
Tiger2o69's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 16
Join Date: May 2004
Location: MS
Posts: 2,221
Send a message via AIM to Tiger2o69 Send a message via MSN to Tiger2o69
Default

3650-70 depending on gas. thats a pretty empty tank there.
__________________
2002 Turbo A4
Tiger2o69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2005, 07:03 PM   #6
On The Tree
 
turbogarrett's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 8
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: 'tosa, wisconsin
Posts: 132
Default

Is that on a dynojet or mustang dyno? With those trap speeds and that weight those numbers seem ~60 rwhp too low? My 2800 lb ls1 rx7 only trapped a hair under 120 with 360 rwhp on a dynojet.
__________________
94 mazda rx7- lsx=11.47 et 124MPH long gone....

996tt flash, exhaust 11.90@120
turbogarrett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2005, 07:17 PM   #7
11 Second Club
 
Tiger2o69's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 16
Join Date: May 2004
Location: MS
Posts: 2,221
Send a message via AIM to Tiger2o69 Send a message via MSN to Tiger2o69
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by turbogarrett
Is that on a dynojet or mustang dyno? With those trap speeds and that weight those numbers seem ~60 rwhp too low? My 2800 lb ls1 rx7 only trapped a hair under 120 with 360 rwhp on a dynojet.
thank you...lol

everyone wants to say oh its ok just a low dyno and runs good. from physics this ddoesnt add up..I have someone looking over the logs now. I think I was going so rich it killed the hp...

I think its a dyno jet btw

I know one guy dynoed 344 and ran .2 thenths slower like 4 hours later at the track. Trap was 2mph slower as well. He had slightly better 60's than I did.

Nitrous he put down like 440 to my 376 and I run the same time w/ a 95 trap to his 90.... I only sprayed from 50 up to his spraying out of the whole...
__________________
2002 Turbo A4
Tiger2o69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2005, 08:32 PM   #8
Staging Lane
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 94
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by turbogarrett
Is that on a dynojet or mustang dyno? With those trap speeds and that weight those numbers seem ~60 rwhp too low? My 2800 lb ls1 rx7 only trapped a hair under 120 with 360 rwhp on a dynojet.
Sounds like a mustang Dyno to me
RUSH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2005, 11:09 AM   #9
12 Second Club
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 216
Default

nice torque....
CarsRFun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2005, 11:28 PM   #10
10 Second Club
 
hc_performance's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 4
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: memphis
Posts: 250
Send a message via AIM to hc_performance
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RUSH
Sounds like a mustang Dyno to me
Nope its a dynojet. This dyno has been known to read sometimes 20-30 rwhp less than others in the same conditions.
__________________
2006 Mercedes slk55 amg intake, exhaust, nitrous
1989 Mustang LS2, s475, th350, meth
2008 Kawasaki zx10r filter, exhaust, pc3
hc_performance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2005, 11:36 PM   #11
11 Second Club
 
DocEwww's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 900
Send a message via AIM to DocEwww
Default

damn and I thought my 12.464 @ 111.85 with 330rwhp was impressive...does sound like ur numbers are way lower than they should be with a 114 trap.
__________________
Godzilla
DocEwww is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2005, 01:18 AM   #12
On The Tree
 
Trader Rating: 2
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 101
Default

340hp on a slightly skewed dyno.... 12.35 at 111

very common with other kind of cars because they buy slicks and gears for the car first...... most ls1 owners are to scared to put some gear and tire under the car then wondor why a 400hp car is running 12's
thenewb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2005, 08:25 PM   #13
11 Second Club
 
Tiger2o69's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 16
Join Date: May 2004
Location: MS
Posts: 2,221
Send a message via AIM to Tiger2o69 Send a message via MSN to Tiger2o69
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thenewb
340hp on a slightly skewed dyno.... 12.35 at 111

very common with other kind of cars because they buy slicks and gears for the car first...... most ls1 owners are to scared to put some gear and tire under the car then wondor why a 400hp car is running 12's
My thoughts exackly People laughed when i said one of the 1st mods should be et streets.... But then i beat cammed cars all the time. So hmmm

However trap shows a lot... I think it was the tune.... I found out in the tuning section when i scaled the maf it creates a mess...
__________________
2002 Turbo A4
Tiger2o69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Tags
376, cardomain, lsx, ss, trailblazer


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


 

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 AC2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Service - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - JOBS
Emails & Contact Details