Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Zombie's "Quick Spool" valve testing with pics and nerd like graphs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-06-2009, 08:19 PM
  #21  
TECH Addict
 
Blackbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bellevue, Wa
Posts: 2,656
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

could you not just make a divided plate to put in between if you don't have a divided housing.
Old 03-06-2009, 08:34 PM
  #22  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
1320's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: LV NV
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by F-BodyGuy98
zombie....this thing has to be by far the meanest butt mount ive ever seen...how do you go about smogging her when it comes to registration? or dont you? lol

It passes smog easily......thanks to obd 2........ The oem pcm thinks its doing its job. It only has a z06 cam in it, so it would probably still pass, even if it was tested at the pipe. At idle and 2500 its just a low compression ls1 with a zo6 cam.
Old 03-06-2009, 10:47 PM
  #23  
Teching In
 
1030tooled's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hey 1320! And sweet car Zombie! Thanks for the great imput!

That's some pretty good handy work on the turbo set-up. Wish I could have been there with the install.

I'm glad you like the turbo flange!

Let me introduce myself My name is Gary and I've been helping Richard(performmetalworks) with the machining side of things. Richard had a great idea and BAM, in one day we machined one.

The intended cost was $400 for the flange and I beleived we could still have a market at that cost, but I said no! We can make this cheaper and out of 304 stainless. So the prices came out at $160 SHIPPED for the non-actuator flange and $260 for the actuator flange. One of the competiters spotted us on ebay and claimed to have a patent on the flange and actually threten us with a lawsuit Mostly because they were charging $800 for a much prettier flange. As of right now we are developing a new kind of way to actuate the butterfly. Just 2 days ago we were completly trying to destroy the new prototype with heat. I guess this would be a good time to ask. About what kind of heat temp would be hovering around the flange when assembled? 800* ?

Anyone with Q can PM me and I will try to answer the best I can. Performmetalworks is out racing for the weekend and I'm trying to fill in.
As of right now, this site is the only site with this much data info from the feild(so to speak) and to top it off,..........It's a rear mount.

Thanks guys

Great to see some feedback on the flange!!!
Old 03-07-2009, 12:17 AM
  #24  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (24)
 
ItsNotStock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Billings, Montana
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

These only work if the hosing is divided correct? I don't have my turbo yet, but do PT88's come with an open or divided one? After reading the link to the other forum I would be a bit worried about back-pressure, but having the valve open up after spool would solve this correct?
Old 03-07-2009, 12:34 AM
  #25  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
1320's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: LV NV
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ItsNotStock
These only work if the hosing is divided correct? I don't have my turbo yet, but do PT88's come with an open or divided one? After reading the link to the other forum I would be a bit worried about back-pressure, but having the valve open up after spool would solve this correct?
You are correct. I cant answer on the housing for the pt88. I would guess that its probably most common with an open housing, and I dont know forsure if a divided is available. Im sure Jose or Rob can answer the housing question. Personally, I would get on the phone and try to see if your vendor can sell one with a divided housing.

The idea is to raise backpressure, but only until the turbo starts making boost, so your right, the open valve eliviates that condition. While the valve is closed, the back pressure is raised, while exhuast gas flow is low, and the pressure on the exhuast wheel is low. The valve while closed causes more pressure on the exhuast wheel, to increase wheel speed sooner and make boost sooner.

Ideally, there could be a desired valve oreintation depending on system design etc. It the "real" world I doubt it could even be measured acurately enough to prove it though.
Old 03-07-2009, 02:20 AM
  #26  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Zombie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Just got back from the track. Unfortunately I didn't run as well as I normally do. Only managed a best of 10.55 and 10.6x and a 10.8 with a passanger. Best 60' was a 1.63 on the 10.55 pass. MPH was 131.xx on the quickest passes.

Before anyone jumps on me for "bad times", the track was absolutely horrible. I tried my first pass at 15psi and that was the 10.6 @ 131 and I had trouble keeping it in the groove up to the 1000' mark. Second pass was at the same boost with a soft launch again and I actually had to abort the pass around the 330' mark because it came out of the groove and went towards the center line. After that experience I turned the boost down to 13psi. It still required me to drive the car (usually it's a relaxing uneventful ride to low 10.x passes) and clicked off the best of 10.55 @ 131. I was hazing the tires through the entire pass even on the lower boost.

I played with the car from some 60-70 mph rolls on the way home from the track (terrifying my GF who was riding shotgun) and the street hooked up MUCH better. Was able to make pulls at 17psi and I think I'm going to be able to squeek 18psi out of this WG spring. Track is open on Sunday again and I plan on going. Since it is a test and tune there will be some track prep.

On another note this thing is an absolute animal on the street. It comes up on boost so fast and smooth it's amazing. I now love my car even more than I did before. I HIGHLY recommend using one of these valves on any street car, the results are absolutely amazing.

I'm also hoping to get some video of this spooling this weekend for everyone. The car is ridiculous to drive.

Last edited by Zombie; 03-07-2009 at 02:28 AM.
Old 03-07-2009, 04:44 AM
  #27  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
 
SPLATT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

oh man i cant wait to see this
Old 03-07-2009, 08:14 AM
  #28  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
geeteego's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well, time for me to find a split-housing 80 for mine.

This is good news for all of we "spool deprived" turbo guys. I''m hoping the addition of a 2-step will at least get me a 10.xx, then go from there.
Old 03-07-2009, 10:48 AM
  #29  
mcx
Staging Lane
 
mcx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Zombie, thanks for being the "step up" guy and trying this new product...i was wondering why these block off valves cant work on a open flange turbo??..it seems it would still build that increased backpressure to spool the turbo earlier while it was in a closed position.

Zombie,any chance you could provide what vehicle that wastegate actuator was from?? thx,mike
Old 03-07-2009, 10:59 AM
  #30  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (18)
 
TurboZ28408's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

it doesnt work on a single scroll turbo because all its doing is shoving a plate in front of the housing, its not effectively reducing the A/R

twin scroll have basically 2 separate turbine housings build into 1, it has 2 volutes inside and when you block one off it basically cuts the A/R into half - effectively increasing velocity and backpressure and diverting all exhaust gas to lets just say " .63 A/R" instead of a full 1.36 A/R"
Old 03-07-2009, 11:09 AM
  #31  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Zombie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

You HAVE to use a divided housing. Divided housings are divided the entire way through the scroll.
Old 03-07-2009, 11:40 AM
  #32  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (17)
 
fenix999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

So how bout someone with a front mount try this with a huge turbo and compare the results. My car is down currently so im not going to be doing anything major anytime soon until its running Good results tho Zombie glad to see everything is working nicely!
Old 03-07-2009, 12:32 PM
  #33  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Zombie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1030tooled
Just 2 days ago we were completly trying to destroy the new prototype with heat. I guess this would be a good time to ask. About what kind of heat temp would be hovering around the flange when assembled? 800* ?
You'll see 700-900C internally depending on the cars setup. Not sure what the external temps will be though. If I can borrow a IR heat gun from someone I can go make some pulls and take the temp of the area i'm in really quick. It will probably be 100C hotter than any readings I get for a conventional turbo setup.

The good news is everything is made of stainless which doesn't have the greatest thermal conductivity.
Old 03-07-2009, 12:45 PM
  #34  
mcx
Staging Lane
 
mcx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TurboZ28408
it doesnt work on a single scroll turbo because all its doing is shoving a plate in front of the housing, its not effectively reducing the A/R

twin scroll have basically 2 separate turbine housings build into 1, it has 2 volutes inside and when you block one off it basically cuts the A/R into half - effectively increasing velocity and backpressure and diverting all exhaust gas to lets just say " .63 A/R" instead of a full 1.36 A/R"
thanks for the explanation...i was thinking that blocking the feed in half would spike the pressure and velocity which would help spool come in earlier, regardless if it was open or divided flange.

Last edited by mcx; 03-07-2009 at 03:40 PM.
Old 03-07-2009, 01:12 PM
  #35  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (35)
 
ninetres's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Mufflerville, CA
Posts: 3,128
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

MPH seems low. Was it humid or muggy out? Even when I spin and "steer my entire pass" I still run 139-140. Who knows? Spinning *USUALLY* only affects ET.
Old 03-07-2009, 01:47 PM
  #36  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
ddnspider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FL
Posts: 14,598
Received 1,739 Likes on 1,299 Posts

Default

looks sweet.1 thing i see those is you dont have any type of piping coming off your wastegate.its going to burn out quicker like that without some sort of pipe to exit the exhaust.
Old 03-07-2009, 02:22 PM
  #37  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
 
frcefed98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 6,907
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1030tooled
Hey 1320! And sweet car Zombie! Thanks for the great imput!

That's some pretty good handy work on the turbo set-up. Wish I could have been there with the install.

I'm glad you like the turbo flange!

Let me introduce myself My name is Gary and I've been helping Richard(performmetalworks) with the machining side of things. Richard had a great idea and BAM, in one day we machined one.

The intended cost was $400 for the flange and I beleived we could still have a market at that cost, but I said no! We can make this cheaper and out of 304 stainless. So the prices came out at $160 SHIPPED for the non-actuator flange and $260 for the actuator flange. One of the competiters spotted us on ebay and claimed to have a patent on the flange and actually threten us with a lawsuit Mostly because they were charging $800 for a much prettier flange. As of right now we are developing a new kind of way to actuate the butterfly. Just 2 days ago we were completly trying to destroy the new prototype with heat. I guess this would be a good time to ask. About what kind of heat temp would be hovering around the flange when assembled? 800* ?

Anyone with Q can PM me and I will try to answer the best I can. Performmetalworks is out racing for the weekend and I'm trying to fill in.
As of right now, this site is the only site with this much data info from the feild(so to speak) and to top it off,..........It's a rear mount.

Thanks guys

Great to see some feedback on the flange!!!
Welcome to tech, and thanks for following our rules by not posting any contact info......other than your name

Nice product you have hope you decide to stick and around decide to sponsor our board so our members can enjoy your product openly.

J
Old 03-07-2009, 06:11 PM
  #38  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Zombie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ninetres
MPH seems low. Was it humid or muggy out? Even when I spin and "steer my entire pass" I still run 139-140. Who knows? Spinning *USUALLY* only affects ET.
I think the MPH was low because I was running less boost and still spinning, but who knows. I was the second fastest vehicle at the track. The fastest was a Hayabusa who went 10.4's. It's sad that out of 40+ bikes the fastest one only went mid 10's.
Old 03-07-2009, 06:20 PM
  #39  
Launching!
iTrader: (3)
 
vandal0-0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Sounds like Its all comeing around for you.Good luck when you finally get some track prep,should be an easy 9's pass.
Old 03-07-2009, 07:48 PM
  #40  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Zombie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Will have to wait to find out if it will improve or not, 9's are not easy. Was going to go to the track tomorrow but I just found a pretty good sized oil leak. Don't know exactly what it is but I'm suspecting it's the oil return line or the rear main seal. Don't want to chance it getting worse or drip oil down the track no matter how much I hate LVMS. I thought it was just excess oil burning off from when I coated my engine bay from the oil cap not being on tight but the top of the engine is dry since I cooked it all off.

It's a real bummer, I wanted to see how the car could do with track prep


Quick Reply: Zombie's "Quick Spool" valve testing with pics and nerd like graphs



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:09 AM.