Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Dissapointing Dyno Numbers. Any Ideas?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-26-2012, 06:31 PM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Schraders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Dissapointing Dyno Numbers. Any Ideas?

I ran my '54 Studebaker on the dyno last week and only managed to make 277 rwhp/391 rwt. This was on 7 pounds, we turned it up to 11 pounds and the thing made 450-ish foot pounds and 306 rwhp at 4000 and then one of the rear tires chucked the tread. On the dyno. Yes, it sucked.

My combination is a 5.3 with an MPT76, T56 six speed and Explorer rear with 3.08 gears. The motor has a TU1 cam and decent valve springs. Fuel is a Bosch 044 and 60 pound injectors. The whole experience was weird, everything worked like it should and IAT's even at 11 pounds were only 103 degrees. Fuel pressure is good and timing is set at 11 degrees. No boost issues, it spools nice and early with the 2" up pipes and there's full boost by 3500. I was expecting a bunch more power, it just lays down at 3800 or so.

Driveability is awesome, it runs great and it's actually pretty fun on the street with the skinny rear tires. The only thing I can think of is my exhaust is too restrictive? It's a single 3" into a Flowmaster 40 series. I think I'm about 100 horsepower down or more? Any ideas?

Old 06-26-2012, 06:35 PM
  #2  
LCW
Staging Lane
iTrader: (6)
 
LCW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Oklahoma Panhandle
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Is it a junkyard motor or high mileage? If so, I would start with a compression test.
Old 06-26-2012, 07:11 PM
  #3  
On The Tree
 
Calbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I don't think your exhaust is the problem, 3" should be able to support a bunch more.
Old 06-26-2012, 07:27 PM
  #4  
TECH Apprentice
 
atomic 6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Omaha,Ne
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Something is very wrong, somewhere.

Those are N/A numbers....

First off get rid of that flowmaster, anything but a flowmaster on a turbo car.

11 degrees timing is pretty low.

What is controlling the fuel/spark?
Old 06-26-2012, 07:30 PM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
 
crazboy99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Powder Springs, GA
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Maybe nothing is wrong with the car. Maybe there is something wrong with the dyno or the settings on the dyno. Try taking it to another dyno to see if the results are near the same. If it is, there might be something hindering your set up.
Old 06-26-2012, 07:34 PM
  #6  
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
MouthPiece's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

a turbo makes a great muffler... idk why anyone would put a muffler after that.. but anyway, it seems like your timing is alittle low... are you running e85? or 93?
Old 06-26-2012, 07:54 PM
  #7  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (27)
 
mike13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Lake Tapps, WA
Posts: 2,229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Check for the obvious stuff like the air filter being sucked closed, condition of the engine. What gear are you doing the pull in? Most are done in 4th (1-1)
Old 06-26-2012, 07:54 PM
  #8  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Schraders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Engine management is stock GM ECU. Compression is 180 across the board. Valve springs are 130 on the seat 340 open. Pulls were made in third gear but when the tire blew it was in fourth. I'm in California so our best pump gas is 91. What I thought was fucked was when we added 4 pounds of boost we only saw 40 foot pounds and about 20 rwhp at 4000.

I wondered about the dyno readings, I was running a vintage style Hurst cheater slick, they are 6.5" wide and retreaded on a radial carcass. They are supposed to be a race tire with a vintage look but one of them came apart on the dyno, it was pretty violent. I wondered if maybe there was tire slip or a false reading because the tires were doing weird ****.



Old 06-26-2012, 08:46 PM
  #9  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (23)
 
1BADAZZSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Blue Springs, Mo
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Change out the muffler for a straight through muffler. Chambered mufflers are a big no no with turbos as they are restrictive and all your doing is chocking the engine. How far back does the exhaust go?
Old 06-26-2012, 09:49 PM
  #10  
Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
denmah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,339
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by atomic 6
Something is very wrong, somewhere.

Those are N/A numbers....

First off get rid of that flowmaster, anything but a flowmaster on a turbo car.

11 degrees timing is pretty low.

What is controlling the fuel/spark?
11deg! wow

yeah crank that bitch.

i ran 14lbs and 14deg on non methanol motors without problems and 4.8s making 500rwhp with 68-75mm turbos intercooled. on automatics!
Old 06-26-2012, 10:22 PM
  #11  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
BAKED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: kentucky
Posts: 1,601
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Got any pics of this setup?
Old 06-26-2012, 10:27 PM
  #12  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Schraders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by BAKED
Got any pics of this setup?
1954 Studebaker.







Old 06-26-2012, 10:37 PM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
itsslow98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,768
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Id be willing to bet that flowmaster is killing about 40rwhp and im not kidding. Whack it off and make another pull.
Old 06-26-2012, 10:42 PM
  #14  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
chiaj144's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Prescott On Canada
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I'd bet the flowmaster is killing more than 40hp. Run it without the muffler and try it again.
Old 06-26-2012, 10:54 PM
  #15  
Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
denmah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,339
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

damn that is awesome and yeah i bet that flowmaster is killing power, i used a chambered muffler on 10lbs of boost on the dyno with my fairmont killed 50rwhp on my 4.8 cammed gt45 car, cut the muffler off and it went strait back up
Old 06-26-2012, 11:08 PM
  #16  
TECH Regular
 
why87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Piqua,OH
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'd think you'd be at least 400whp+
Old 06-26-2012, 11:28 PM
  #17  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Schraders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by why87
I'd think you'd be at least 400whp+
That's what I thought too. I ran the Flowmaster thinking it might kill 50-60 rwhp and that might not be so bad considering the chassis it's in. Which is why I'm wondering if the tires had something to do with the dyno reading wrong. What motor makes 390 foot pounds and only 277 horsepower? And it peaks at 3900?
Old 06-27-2012, 01:36 AM
  #18  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (33)
 
skinnies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: KS
Posts: 2,431
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Do a compression check, I got a brand new EPP cam that was ground wrong once, didn't dyno, but the car was obviously a huge turd, pulled compression check and numbers were horrible. Threw in my old cam and bam, compression check looked good and went out on the street and pulled good again.
Old 06-27-2012, 02:09 AM
  #19  
Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
denmah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,339
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

so only 277? ive tuned NA 5.3s that made that, man i wonder whats up

should have easily nailed down 500+
Old 06-27-2012, 02:09 AM
  #20  
Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
denmah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,339
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by skinnies
Do a compression check, I got a brand new EPP cam that was ground wrong once, didn't dyno, but the car was obviously a huge turd, pulled compression check and numbers were horrible. Threw in my old cam and bam, compression check looked good and went out on the street and pulled good again.
thats a great suggestion, you should see like 150 with a truck motor and a mild cam closed throttle


Quick Reply: Dissapointing Dyno Numbers. Any Ideas?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:54 PM.