Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

these sufficient for twins?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-15-2014, 09:54 PM
  #1  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
stangtrader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: PNW
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default these sufficient for twins?

Im looking at buying 2 turbonetics 60-1 hifi's with probly .68 t4 oncenter (I know tangental is way better flow ).
Im leaning towards building a twin low mount kit simalar to the aps kit but im mostly concerned about packaging and power.cars a 98 camaro m6 with a 2005 ls6 with a tick turbo cam.im planning on around 600-700 whp for when I do highway pulls with room to grow for an eventual forged motor but also want fast spool. Car is 99% street
Old 02-15-2014, 11:56 PM
  #2  
kjm
Launching!
 
kjm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Those should get you to 600 pretty easy and should spool nice. I made 750rwhp with 351 Windsor and twin 60mm and they spoiled great. I had .68 housing and t4
Old 02-15-2014, 11:58 PM
  #3  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
stangtrader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: PNW
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok cool thanks.i was thinking they will be about good.were the compressor covers relatively small?
Old 02-16-2014, 05:07 AM
  #4  
9 Second Club
 
stevieturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 13,616
Received 180 Likes on 155 Posts

Default

Most of the 60-1's are fairly compact ?

Why insisting on on-centre housings ?

It's surprising what there is room for down low when you try.
Old 02-16-2014, 03:08 PM
  #5  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
stangtrader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: PNW
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I figured on center would make packaging easier from looking at BBOO"SS"T thread. But 60-1 are pretty compact, I found the dimensions on tnetics website. I talked with someone local that runs a tti tt kit on a c5 that makes close to 1k.im now entertaining using t3\t4 with the hpc 61 wheel with a e cover and f1-62 turbine vbanded inlet and outlets with .85ar. I think they will be pretty damn efficient and give instant spool.i know said vette has pretty much the same turbos minus a 58mm compressor.
Old 02-16-2014, 04:56 PM
  #6  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
Boo"SS"t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: somewhere in Ohio
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

If you're planning on a forged 347, I would just go with t3/t4 and either go 62 or 65mm turbine wheel w/ .85a/r turbine housing, and maybe go with the optional HPC wheel and that would make it pretty responsive. But if you're building a stroker motor, I would go straight t4. and still go with HPC(billet) compressor wheel. And another thing, I would'nt go with the on-center turbine housing, I don't think it would matter much as far as packaging them.

Last edited by Boo"SS"t; 02-16-2014 at 05:02 PM.
Old 02-16-2014, 10:05 PM
  #7  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
stangtrader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: PNW
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Awesome thanks for the input man.when I go forged it will be a 347 most likely. I think the t3\t4s I am thinking of should be good. May just go with the 58mm compressor. Seems turbonetics has the billet hpc wheels on back order 8-10 weeks . Hopefully ill be able to get the car driving by mid april



Quick Reply: these sufficient for twins?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:08 PM.