General LSX Automobile Discussion Non-technical LSX related topics.

fuel economy of a 4.8l?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-08-2011, 01:49 PM
  #1  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Wimimc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Somerset NJ
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default fuel economy of a 4.8l?

so i've been thinking of engines to swap into my S10, it would be a daily driver so fuel economy is by far more of a concern than power.

i rarely drive on the highway, and when i do its not for an extended period of time so i'm mainly looking for city mileage.

the truck is a 95 extended cab S10
3.08 posi
5 speed
weighs about 3300

i've been thinking bout swapping a newer ecotec out of a cobalt or cavalier into it but i've just started thinking about a gen III motor.

so what kind of city mileage do you think i could get out of a 4.8L? heck even a 5.3?

Last edited by Wimimc; 09-08-2011 at 08:24 PM.
Old 09-08-2011, 04:51 PM
  #2  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
71novaguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I dont think it would get much better than the 5.3, but it sure can't hurt. I have the 4.8 in my 07 silverado extended cab, standard bed, 2wd, and with 3.23 gears it gets 16-17 in mixed driving, best of 22 on the highway. In your set up, I could see it getting a solid 18 with dips into the 20's if the city driving your talking about isn't constant redlights and speeds of 30-45 mph most of the route.

I may be the only one on this, but I would be curious if you wouldnt benifit from a little deeper gear if all your doing is city driving. Keep you in a more constant power band and keep it from lugging. This would depend on what rpm you are usually at driving speeds.
Old 09-08-2011, 08:15 PM
  #3  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Wimimc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Somerset NJ
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

not constant, but there are a fair amount of redlights, depends on if i get lucky or not, and speeds on roads can be anywhere from 30-50, typically the speed limit being ~40-45

i would be babying and trying to shift ~2000 rpm as much as possible, and depending on the speed i'd try to keep them 1000-1500
And if i had i to i would swap a 6 speed in.

what number gears are you thinking?

Last edited by Wimimc; 09-08-2011 at 08:24 PM.
Old 09-08-2011, 08:26 PM
  #4  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (7)
 
cali_bear2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

What happened to the original motor? If the original engine is in need of a replacement, I would just replace the 4 with another 4 cylinder due to fuel consumption. I have 2 S10's and both have the 4.3 V6....its a thirsty beast.
Old 09-08-2011, 08:43 PM
  #5  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Wimimc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Somerset NJ
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

haha it has the 4.3 in it, the vortec with the CPI

originally i was looking for a 2.2 but this truck had everything else i was looking for

and so i'm thinking i can swap in an ecotec and drop 50 horsepower and a fair amount of torque, but gain substantial mileage, or swap in the 4.8L and get a little better gas mileage (hopefully, if i see 21-23 i would be extremely happy) and much more power.
Old 09-09-2011, 01:56 AM
  #6  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
JohnS Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Lansing, Michigan
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

oh i had a 4.3 vortech in my blazer and was getting...well more than i get now HAHA.
I was doing...GOOD city driving? not many lights and the speeds of a couple roads were 45-55 and the lowest was 35, and if i got lucky i didnt hit many lights.
I probably got 20 MPG...because i defiantly noticed a changed in my gas bill once i bought this... I probably get 18 in my z28.

anyway...4.8 in a s10...maybe high teens, low 20s is reasonable, but kinda unlikely.
5.3...high teens
Old 09-09-2011, 01:31 PM
  #7  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (7)
 
cali_bear2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Well, both of my s10's are the 4x4 models. I have one ZR2 which I recently took out on a long trip. I had my cruise set at 65mph and my BEST on the road was 18.5 MPG. Granted, I have 31 inch tires and 3.73 in the rear, but the 4.3 is certainly a thirsty. My other is also a 4x4 with the standard 235/75/15 tires, but it is also running a 3.73 rear. My best around town and this is while driving like a dying snail is 17.035 MPG. I always let up at 2000rpm and let the trans grab the next gear for maximum mileage, but this is all I can manage myself. I also have the 4l60e trans in both trucks. I hope that others with the 4x4 drive is actually getting better consumption then me......the 4.8 will drink more....but sound Way Better out back!!!
Old 09-09-2011, 02:00 PM
  #8  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Wimimc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Somerset NJ
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

you really think that the 4.8 would drink more? i mean with my LS1 i get 18-19 consistently, and thats the a 4l60e and 3.23 gears, i figured that the 4.8 being smaller and behind a 5 or 6 speed would yield some better mileage
Old 09-09-2011, 06:50 PM
  #9  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
71novaguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

not constant, but there are a fair amount of redlights, depends on if i get lucky or not, and speeds on roads can be anywhere from 30-50, typically the speed limit being ~40-45

i would be babying and trying to shift ~2000 rpm as much as possible, and depending on the speed i'd try to keep them 1000-1500
And if i had i to i would swap a 6 speed in.

what number gears are you thinking?
the 6 speed would be overkill for what you are doing. I suggest taking the tire size, gear ratio, and the gear ratio of the trans and putting it into a rpm calculator. Find out what combo gets you around 1200-1400 rpm at 45 mph if thats where you typically find yourself driving. That would keep you from lugging it and allow you to cruise at a low rpm. that should result in some good mpgs
Old 09-09-2011, 07:11 PM
  #10  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Wimimc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Somerset NJ
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

hm with my 5 speed trans, 3.08 rear, and tires (27")
45 @ 1259
65 @ 1819

if i go with 16 inch rims but a smaller sidewall

29"

45 @ 1172
86 @ 1693

does that sound right?

Last edited by Wimimc; 09-09-2011 at 07:19 PM.
Old 09-10-2011, 11:47 AM
  #11  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
71novaguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Id stay with the first combo.
Old 09-27-2011, 09:55 PM
  #12  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (3)
 
1999 SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: detroit area
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i bet youd get a lot better milage with a 5.3 or 4.8 v8 then you will from your current 4.3 v6 then you think. a big engine moving a light load is more efficient then a small engine moving a big load and in this case for a v8 your 32-3400lb truck is a light load.
Old 09-28-2011, 07:20 AM
  #13  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Wimimc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Somerset NJ
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

thats what i'm thinking, these trucks and SUVs getting ~16-17 city (which is what i'm getting with the 4.3 right now) are at least a thousand pounds more than me.
Old 09-28-2011, 08:09 AM
  #14  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (26)
 
kinglt-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ft. Wayne, IN
Posts: 5,794
Received 196 Likes on 138 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1999 SS
i bet youd get a lot better milage with a 5.3 or 4.8 v8 then you will from your current 4.3 v6 then you think. a big engine moving a light load is more efficient then a small engine moving a big load and in this case for a v8 your 32-3400lb truck is a light load.
This!!!
Old 09-28-2011, 08:34 AM
  #15  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
JimsWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Norwich, NY
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Theres lots of fairly inexpensive bolt on's you can do to the 4.3 to get better mileage. Electric fans, and UD pulley top the list. And I know everyone thinks 3.08's will give you better mileage than say 3.42's or 3.73's but I've proved this theory wrong on my S10's. I'd dump those.
Old 09-28-2011, 01:42 PM
  #16  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Wimimc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Somerset NJ
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JimsWS6
Theres lots of fairly inexpensive bolt on's you can do to the 4.3 to get better mileage. Electric fans, and UD pulley top the list. And I know everyone thinks 3.08's will give you better mileage than say 3.42's or 3.73's but I've proved this theory wrong on my S10's. I'd dump those.
i definitely plan on doing the electric fans and tuning it.

i noticed that about the gears, idk if its that or the transmission, but in my camaro 4th + 3.23 gears is at a lower rpm than 5th + 3.08 on the truck
Old 09-28-2011, 01:45 PM
  #17  
TECH Fanatic
 
Fry_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Marengo, Ia
Posts: 1,324
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1999 SS
i bet youd get a lot better milage with a 5.3 or 4.8 v8 then you will from your current 4.3 v6 then you think. a big engine moving a light load is more efficient then a small engine moving a big load and in this case for a v8 your 32-3400lb truck is a light load.
I've seen proof of this first hand when 6 or 7 years ago my dad traded in his 95 GMC 1500 2wd standard cab long box, with a tbi305, and 5spd that got 18-19mpg hiway, for a 2000 GMC 1500 2wd standard cab shortbox, with a 4.3 v6, and a 5spd and dropped to 16-17mpg hiway. A small motor in a heavy vehical has to work to hard. then add the more efficent efi setup, more advanced computer, more efficent combution chamber, and coil on plug ignition, and I don't see how you couldn't gain mpg if you keep you foot out of it, and around town I could see you gaining mpg with 3.42 or 3.37 gears with either motor and more so with the 4.3 be cause you'd lug less. I also dout there would be much of a milage difference between a 4.8 and a 5.3
Old 09-28-2011, 08:10 PM
  #18  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
JimsWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Norwich, NY
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Wimimc
i definitely plan on doing the electric fans and tuning it.

i noticed that about the gears, idk if its that or the transmission, but in my camaro 4th + 3.23 gears is at a lower rpm than 5th + 3.08 on the truck

you want a V6 to be 1800-2100 rpm at 60 in OD. 1800 for 2wd, 2100 for 4wd's. I've seen charts online before about this, stating the same thing. But all of my S10's are 2-2200rpm at 60 with the gears i have in them. Great performance and fuel economy for what they are.
Old 02-28-2021, 07:04 AM
  #19  
Teching In
 
Danny Bradley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default I plan on swapping my 4.3 to a 4.8ls

Originally Posted by kinglt-1
This!!!
right now I’m the city I get like around 13 mpg and that’s with shifts never going over 2000rpm but on the highway I get around 20-22 doing 80 and 2,000 rpm. And any recommendations for gears once I build my 4.8
Old 02-28-2021, 03:18 PM
  #20  
TECH Apprentice
 
98ws6blk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 360
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

From a strictly financial perspective, you can buy a lot of gas for the cost of doing an LS swap.



Quick Reply: fuel economy of a 4.8l?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:54 PM.