matts22

iTrader: (2)

I was just wondering, for comparisons sake, has anyone had TEA heads flowed on another companies flowbench, or had another companies heads flowed on TEA's flowbench? I am pretty sure that TEA is who I'll be getting heads from, but I can't really compare their heads to others because they use an exhaust pipe for flowing. Regardless, I've heard that they flow really well on the exhaust side. I would just like to see how they compare. So has anyone done this and will you share the results? Thanks!

pdd

iTrader: (3)

TEA flow tested my afr 205's when they were stock. they flowed 300 on the intake at .600

98TAauto

iTrader: (2)

I think every company has flows other's heads before. Most of the time they dont put down the same numbers they claim. People have flowed TEA's also and said they didnt do what TEA said either so it works both ways. Just look at whats working for everyone out there. AFR and TEA both seem pretty good.. just do you have 2100 to spend or 1400-1700 to spend

flows help, but they dont mean everything.. for some reason ive seen cars with not so good flows kick a car that has about 10cfm more flow range across the track ET wise. Granted it could be setup and etc

given the same flow bench is being used, i think the AFR's are all showing 299-302 at .600

93Polo

iTrader: (5)

TEA consistantly turns good #s and their heads come with the bigger Comp 987s. I'm very happy with my results.

Just add a Futral Cam