Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Machine shop messed up my pulley!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-23-2005, 04:37 PM
  #1  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (76)
 
SSPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Goshen NY
Posts: 2,902
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Machine shop messed up my pulley!!!!

http://www.ls1howto.com/howto/fbody/...p_machined.jpg

Brought it to them to have machined for the double roller timing chain. told them what to do insted they took .180 of the end of it insted of extending the shoulder. whould it be safe to run if i take off the .180 and make the shoulder again

pic 1
pic 2

Old 02-23-2005, 04:42 PM
  #2  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (59)
 
Bo White's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Vance, Alabama
Posts: 2,357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Pix arent clear so its hard to tell, retake a few and repost.
Old 02-23-2005, 04:57 PM
  #3  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (76)
 
SSPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Goshen NY
Posts: 2,902
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

pic 3
pic 4
Old 02-23-2005, 05:08 PM
  #4  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (59)
 
Bo White's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Vance, Alabama
Posts: 2,357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The main thing is to make sure the front seal will still seal off. It doesnt look like they took any off the diameter just took material off the back of the balancer/pulley itself. Did they ever take the .180 off the right area after all the nonsence?
Old 02-23-2005, 05:13 PM
  #5  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (76)
 
SSPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Goshen NY
Posts: 2,902
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

nope still needs the 180 of the right part. u think aslong as it seals it will be ok
Old 02-23-2005, 05:16 PM
  #6  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (59)
 
Bo White's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Vance, Alabama
Posts: 2,357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Yeah, if you are sure you explained everything clearly to that shop take it to ANOTHER shop and have it finished up. Should be fine and in actual reality the way its done looks like you will have a little extra clearance for the timing cover atleast.
Old 02-23-2005, 05:25 PM
  #7  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
Beast96Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Isn't the pulley supposed to seat on the timing gear to keep it firmly in place? If they shortened it, it wouldn't be touching the timing gear, plus the pully would fully seat on the crank, which it's not supposed to. I don't think the pulley would torque to spec then either. This assuming the shortened it .180".
Old 02-23-2005, 05:25 PM
  #8  
11 Second Club
 
jerflash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: long island, ny
Posts: 1,495
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

hey i did not need to machine mine to put on the double roller

only the old pullies you have to cut...not the new ones

mine is perfect
Old 02-23-2005, 05:28 PM
  #9  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (76)
 
SSPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Goshen NY
Posts: 2,902
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i will go try and put it on and see what happens with out geting it cut again
Old 02-23-2005, 06:06 PM
  #10  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (76)
 
SSPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Goshen NY
Posts: 2,902
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

fit with no problem at all i guess it it comes off that gives me all the more motive to finish up my 396
Old 02-23-2005, 06:19 PM
  #11  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (16)
 
fast98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: michigan
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

ya i would make sure that seats against the timing gear. when the pulley is fully seated it should sit about 2 mm higher the the crank nose. the reason gm has such crazy torque on that bolt is cause the crank uses a forged roll-pin, and if the clamp load isnt between the pulley and timing gear u can rip off the roll pin which will let the timing gear freewheel. i work at the dealer and i have seen it, its not pretty

Last edited by fast98; 02-23-2005 at 06:38 PM.
Old 02-23-2005, 06:51 PM
  #12  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
Beast96Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by fast98
ya i would make sure that seats against the timing gear. when the pulley is fully seated it should sit about 2 mm higher the the crank nose. the reason gm has such crazy torque on that bolt is cause the crank uses a forged roll-pin, and if the clamp load isnt between the pulley and timing gear u can rip off the roll pin which will let the timing gear freewheel. i work at the dealer and i have seen it, its not pretty
That's what I was trying to say. The pully should stick out a little further than the crank.
Old 02-23-2005, 08:18 PM
  #13  
8 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (76)
 
SSPerformance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Goshen NY
Posts: 2,902
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

yep it does set exactly like u said so i guess it should be fine




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:32 PM.