finished the afr205 and g5x3 cam today.
#1
finished the afr205 and g5x3 cam today.
well,it's done and running. this time it only took 12hrs(25hrs last time)the x3 cam sounds the same as the x2 did. i have not went over 4,000rpm's yet so i feel no difference between cams. the car seems to have more power rowing through the gears as i floored it to 4,000 1st through 4th. no tune,no dyno #'s yet. i'll get back to ya all.last time 380hp mustand dyno and 431 dyno jet. we will see soon if the afr heads are better then another sponcers ported head. mike c.
#2
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
Originally Posted by mike c.
well,it's done and running. this time it only took 12hrs(25hrs last time)the x3 cam sounds the same as the x2 did. i have not went over 4,000rpm's yet so i feel no difference between cams.
#3
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Beast96Z
If everone actually new the diffrence in specs between these 2 cams, they wouldn't even bother with the swap. It's deffinatlly not worth it unless your in there already doing heads or something internal. Hope it does good for ya.
#4
Originally Posted by Beast96Z
If everone actually new the diffrence in specs between these 2 cams, they wouldn't even bother with the swap. It's deffinatlly not worth it unless your in there already doing heads or something internal. Hope it does good for ya.
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Senior Member
It is not weird, it says Word.
Should be nice setup, keep us posted but with a little more details.
Head mill??
SCR ??
Gasket??
How much flycut (cc of valve relief)??
Should be nice setup, keep us posted but with a little more details.
Head mill??
SCR ??
Gasket??
How much flycut (cc of valve relief)??
#9
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Novi, MI
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SmaknSS
Thats why I wouldnt bother buying one of those cam's, You dont know what your getting, I want spec's.
Last edited by Ramair346; 04-12-2005 at 06:40 PM.
#10
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: North Texas
Posts: 8,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by pdd
why wierd?
i bet that setup will hit 470rwhp
i bet that setup will hit 470rwhp
and yea...it should put down some wicked power. especially considering what it cost
#15
Moderator
iTrader: (9)
Originally Posted by SmaknSS
Thats why I wouldnt bother buying one of those cam's, You dont know what your getting, I want spec's.
How well do you understand cams??
Everyone that complains about needing to know specs should really understand cams. Just because Cam A has more duration at .050 (Where cams are rated) doesn't mean it is a bigger cam!!! Please take a look here https://ls1tech.com/forums/generation-iii-internal-engine/158394-camshaft-discussion-part-iii.html
Example and then it can go back on topic..
Com 240 XER lobe
.006 - 289* duration
.050 - 240* duration
.200 - 161* duration
.605 lift
My proposed Lobe
.006 - 260
.050 - 220
.200 - 160
.600 lift
What lobe is bigger?
What would you be more concerned with in your motor clearing things?
But the 240 XE-R is sooo much bigger at .050 than the proposed 220. See where I am going?
#17
sorry,lack of info. the heads are milled to 59cc and i went with the cametic 0.40 gasket. i was told the x3 makes 10hp more only on the topend then the x2 does. other then that the two are verry close. 380hp stang dyno,i'm hopeing for 420hp on the same dyno. that would put me in the 470ish on a dyno jet. the dyno jet had me at 431hp. the ap stang dyno is a humbler.
#20
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
Originally Posted by LIL SS
My proposed Lobe
.006 - 260
.050 - 220
.200 - 160
.600 lift
What lobe is bigger?
What would you be more concerned with in your motor clearing things?
But the 240 XE-R is sooo much bigger at .050 than the proposed 220. See where I am going?