Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Carbs & Distributor for GEN III Engines

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-14-2005, 08:07 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Pikanjoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Carbs & Distributor for GEN III Engines

First, I'm new to this board and new to the Gen III world. I just purchased a low mileage 6L LQ4 at a good price (maybe it's an LQ9 - not sure how to tell). I'm not sure yet what I'll do with it but looking at all my options.
My question for this board is: is it feasible to convert this engine to carburetor and distributor like the old Gen I engines.
I saw in the "How to build High Performance Chevy LS1/LS6 V-8s" book that GM performance parts offers intake manifold and a stand alone ignition system (distributor) for Gen III engines. IMO this would be a lot simpler and cheaper to install than going EFI and GEN III ignition system.
Does anybody have any experience going with carbs and/or distributor on GEN III engines.

Thanks.. Pikanjoe
Old 06-15-2005, 12:16 AM
  #2  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (12)
 
Wnts2Go10O's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rockville, MD
Posts: 4,354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

you dont want it, i saw it in chevy high po and well it looks like more work than its worth
Old 06-15-2005, 07:59 AM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

You can do a single plane, FI with MSD management box.
Old 06-15-2005, 12:49 PM
  #4  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (9)
 
ChucksZ06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 976
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

The carb articles on the ls1 are really dishonest in that they put heads and a bigger cam on the engine along with the carb and then brag about how much horsepower it makes. why not baseline the head/cam additions with the fuel injection tuned for optimum horsepower like they do with the carb setup...Then compare horsepower and torque. Either these guys are trying to help sell carbs or they are stuck in the past with nostalgia. Carbs suck compared to injection.
Old 06-15-2005, 12:56 PM
  #5  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
slowpoke96z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: cedar hill, tx
Posts: 2,099
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ChucksZ06
Carbs suck compared to injection.
for driveability and ease of tune purposes, not making power.
not counting intake manifold or cam, its been proven that a carb makes more power/torque than FI, when the carb is properly matched and tuned to the engine. it just takes ALOT more homework to do it with a carburetor
Old 06-15-2005, 12:59 PM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by slowpoke96z28
for driveability and ease of tune purposes, not making power.
not counting intake manifold or cam, its been proven that a carb makes more power/torque than FI, when the carb is properly matched and tuned to the engine. it just takes ALOT more homework to do it with a carburetor
Well that has changed with MAFless tuning.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:00 PM.