Futral Cams....
#1
Futral Cams....
I'm looking for some feedback on the Futral Cams. A friend of mine has one and I was impressed. I am looking at getting the F10 (228/228 112).
Anyone have this cam? Anyone running it with a 4000 stall?
Info!
Thank you,
Mike
edit: I should point out the time in my sig is with a 3500 stall and the TR224-114 untuned...how would the F10 and 4000 stall compare?
Anyone have this cam? Anyone running it with a 4000 stall?
Info!
Thank you,
Mike
edit: I should point out the time in my sig is with a 3500 stall and the TR224-114 untuned...how would the F10 and 4000 stall compare?
#4
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Herndon, VA
Posts: 732
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ive been looking at Futral, too... I see a lot of talk about the new, bigger F#'s, like 13 and 15, but the specs on the F5-112 (224/228 .588/.576) look pretty good (Lopy w/lots of torque?), so I'm trying to decide between that and a few others... Can any one compare the F5 to anything like the TR224 (224-even .563/.563 112) or the Crane HR-216/3241 (216/224 .551/.551 LSA ?). Crane bills this a good cam for a blower, is that why it has just 216 duration at the Intake? The TR224 has a fast ramp rate, so no 1.8 rockers, but the Crane seems to be much slower (278@.004 - 216@.050 = 62), and with 1.8 rockers could increase the lift from .551 to .583. The high ramp rate sounds good, but i've read a few posts that talk about the wear the lifters from it. Any thoughts?
#7
TECH Addict
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Honolulu HI
Posts: 2,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ive got the f10 on a 114 in a m6. its not bad. i think my car was weak from the start. I put down 377/371 tuned full bolt on except for the pulley. It was also tuned with a vaccum leak im going to upgrade to the f13 or 14 on a 112 this time. Not to mention that the customer service is bomb!!! They're all great there! hmm...let me see if i can scan my dyno graph.
Trending Topics
#14
10 Second Club
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ninobrn99
ive got the f10 on a 114 in a m6. its not bad. i think my car was weak from the start. I put down 377/371 tuned full bolt on except for the pulley. It was also tuned with a vaccum leak im going to upgrade to the f13 or 14 on a 112 this time. Not to mention that the customer service is bomb!!! They're all great there! hmm...let me see if i can scan my dyno graph.
#15
TECH Addict
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Honolulu HI
Posts: 2,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yeah i do.....it doesnt really matter right now anyways. my clutch is slipping in the worst way so i cant reap the benifits from it till i install my RAM PG HD in a week or 2. I know. i was dissapointed with the numbers too oh well, im going bigger anyways
#20
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
Originally Posted by 99ssleeper
Part of the reason I want to go with the F10 is the .575" lift as opposed to .595" on the F11 and up.
I'd like to use Comp 918s...
I'd like to use Comp 918s...
Now speaking in terms of spring longevity, the lower lift may help you out a bit there.