Anybody w/ an F13 113+4?
#1
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 1,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Anybody w/ an F13 113+4?
Just wondering how the 113 LSA w/ the +4 advance would move the curves relative to the cam on a 112+4. ICL's increase by 1 degree to 109. Overlap decreases by 2 degrees to 5. I'm assuming the power band shift up slightly since the higher LSA, but how much so?
#2
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Honestly I don't think you'll see a huge jump in your powerband, probably 150 rpm. I've laid graphs of the 114 over my 112 and it was a 200 rpm difference in peak. Just wondering, why are you considering going with the 113? Are you worried about idle quality? If so, get the 112, I can assure you you'll have NO problems and it will idle better than the 230 you have in there now. Just for some sort of reference, this is my f11 (228/230) on a 112+4, as you can see, it almost has a stock idle to it. The F13's idle is almost identical to it.
http://www.lsuxblake.com/vids%20001.avi
Good luck with your cam
http://www.lsuxblake.com/vids%20001.avi
Good luck with your cam
#3
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 1,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm not worried about idle quality. Its just i'm going to a Catted Y caback setup w/ this cam, and w/ my tr230 at idle it smells rich as hell b/c of the overlap (letting some unburnt gas into the exhaust). So I was wanting to keep the overlap relatively the same or less than what i've got w/ the 230. But hell I guess the smell won't be as bad as w/ the !cats. Thanks
That f11 does sound very stock for the size of it. It'd be a helluva sleeper cam w/ the dual/dual setup i'm puttin on.
That f11 does sound very stock for the size of it. It'd be a helluva sleeper cam w/ the dual/dual setup i'm puttin on.
Last edited by FstBlkz28; 10-02-2005 at 01:49 AM.