Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Ready for Cam install, Now I am having second thoughts on my stick.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-19-2005, 09:52 AM
  #1  
12 Second Club
Thread Starter
 
ROJO99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Ready for Cam install, Now I am having second thoughts on my stick.

My tuner asked what Cam I putting in and I replied back 230/224 575/563 on a 111LSA. I picked up this cam because I am thinking it will be easy on the springs, give me a Old School Big Block lope and hopefully 400HP at the wheels.

Next my tuner said the Cam will be harder to tune (due to the LSA) and the reverse splits are old Tech and I may only pick up 35HP from the swap.

So my quesiton is, is the above true and should I get another stick before install?

FYI, I have a 99 Corvette (FRC) MN6, LS6 intake, LT headers, Random Cats and X-pipe and Vararam VR-2B. To date best is 12.42

Thanks in advance.
Old 10-19-2005, 11:24 AM
  #2  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (8)
 
ninobrn99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Honolulu HI
Posts: 2,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

txhorns281 has/had that cam and put down some good numbers. he did his own tuning also. the car will be a bit tough to get to idle..it may be at 1k or so w/o a/c. Reverse splits will put down bigger numbers, but will not do as well on torque.
Old 10-19-2005, 11:59 AM
  #3  
!LS1 11 Second Club
 
SouthFL.02.SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Miami
Posts: 7,133
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Thunder's tried and true TR230.
Thunder Racing Custom "Reverse Split" Camshaft - 230/224 .575/.563 111 LSA 2200-6800 RPM Power Band. Excellent mid-range & high RPM power. Automatic cars require computer tuning and it is recommend for optimum results on manual transmission cars .

It's not as easy on the valve springs as you may think due to its aggressive lobe profile.

When I was choosing cams a few years ago, I was between the TR230 and the TSP231/237. I went with the 231/237 (actually, the 231/237 is easier on valvesprings due to its softer lobes, despite its greater duration and lift), but I'm sure I would have been just as happy with the TR230. Tuning has come far these days. A good tuner can get that cam driveable no prob. It does lope nicely.
Also, see the overlay of the TR230 vs, the TR224. The 230 doesn't give up too much at all down low compared to its younger brother.





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:05 PM.