Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

427 summer build?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-14-2005, 09:32 AM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
ls6jimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 427 summer build?

I have LS1 block that I would like to resleeve, but I'm trying to figure out what bore, rod length & crank to use to get to 427? Any help would be appreciated, because I'm trying to round up parts for this summer.

Thanks
Old 12-14-2005, 10:34 AM
  #2  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
Wet 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

4.125" bore, 6.125" rods, 4" crank for "normal" 427.

You can also use a 4.060 bore with a 4.125" stroke to reach 427.
Old 12-14-2005, 02:00 PM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (60)
 
Ferocity02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,397
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Sounds like your in the same boat as me. I am going with a 4.125" stroke and a 4" bore as said. I think it is actually a 427.65, which would be a 428ci, but 427ci sounds so much cooler.
Old 12-14-2005, 03:35 PM
  #4  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
badaSS346's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NJ
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ls6jimmy
I have LS1 block that I would like to resleeve, but I'm trying to figure out what bore, rod length & crank to use to get to 427? Any help would be appreciated, because I'm trying to round up parts for this summer.

Thanks
I think its cheaper to sell the LS1 block and resleeve a LS2. However from what i hear resleeved ls1's are stronger.
Old 12-14-2005, 03:39 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (15)
 
98_Formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: West Seneca, NY
Posts: 1,058
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Wet 1
4.125" bore, 6.125" rods, 4" crank for "normal" 427.

You can also use a 4.060 bore with a 4.125" stroke to reach 427.
wouldnt you get more power from using a bigger stroke and smaller bore, as apposed to the first setup?
Old 12-14-2005, 06:03 PM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (60)
 
Ferocity02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,397
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 98_Formula
wouldnt you get more power from using a bigger stroke and smaller bore, as apposed to the first setup?
A longer stroke limits high RPM reliability. I wouldn't feel comfortable spinning a 4.125" crank past 6500rpm unless the motor was 100% solid.
Old 12-14-2005, 09:06 PM
  #7  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
ls6jimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the input




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:58 PM.