Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Lift question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-20-2007, 06:00 PM
  #1  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
99/5.3w/hips's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Lift question

Would it be beneficial to go with a high duration cam but still keep the lift low and also have a tight lsa to keep midrange power at its best? For example, wouldn't a 224/224 .563/.563 110+0 make more under the curve power and still be able to make good peak power better than a 224/224 .588/.588 112+0? I would think that the 110 and low lift would suit stock heads better and the 112 higher lift would be better suited for ported heads or at least better flowing heads. Am I wrong here?
Old 02-21-2007, 10:19 AM
  #2  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
99/5.3w/hips's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

bump. Anyone?
Old 02-21-2007, 11:44 AM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (18)
 
mvvette97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Leon Iowa
Posts: 1,766
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I am thinking the same as you on this. My cam is a 228/230 but has a lower lift than most 228 cams. 571/573 is the lift on mine. I am also running the stock heads. Lower lift is also easier on springs. Alot of guys think of only one thing, MAX POWER but I wanted reliability also. I also probably went overkill on my springs but I got the Patriot Golds because they are good for 650 lift. I think it's a bad idea to push a spring toward it's max.
Old 02-21-2007, 07:13 PM
  #4  
On The Tree
 
FIVE-O's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Speedway, Indiana
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I agree. I also wanted reliability. And the low lift didnt seem to affect making 421rwhp. I still dont understand all the hype over huge lift.
Old 02-21-2007, 10:06 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
JBIRD02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Orange Park/ Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 99/5.3w/hips
Would it be beneficial to go with a high duration cam but still keep the lift low and also have a tight lsa to keep midrange power at its best? For example, wouldn't a 224/224 .563/.563 110+0 make more under the curve power and still be able to make good peak power better than a 224/224 .588/.588 112+0? I would think that the 110 and low lift would suit stock heads better and the 112 higher lift would be better suited for ported heads or at least better flowing heads. Am I wrong here?
my 226/236 .525 110lsa made 392rwhp and 373rwtq fwiw
Old 02-22-2007, 09:28 AM
  #6  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
LS1Formulation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Posts: 2,458
Received 443 Likes on 354 Posts

Default

The reason that lift is important is most heads flow more at higher lift values, especially LS1 heads, even stock ones. It'd be better to have a cam with lower duration and HIGHER lift with a tighter LSA. Check out Patrick G's torque cam thread. You'll get a lot of info from that. You can't just look at LSA, either. You need to look at overlap. A 204/208 @.050 cam on a 108 LSA will have less overlap than a 234/238 @.050 on a 114LSA. Every aspect of a cam has to be designed together.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:57 AM.