Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

LLsr heads & cam stk blk e85 ls3 build... Update Dyno#s 560.5 W hp and 575.3 W Torque

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-26-2015, 04:56 PM
  #21  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
DietCoke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Richmond Hill, GA
Posts: 3,869
Received 56 Likes on 49 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Jimbo1367
LOL. TFF. It does seem that dietcoke only chimes in to doubt or criticize.
Just calling a duck a duck. 570tq out of 376 inches and an absurd horsepower peak at 6300? Sure, I believe the HP # is possible, but not at that rpm.

Maybe even a turducken, I think.

Last edited by DietCoke; 11-27-2015 at 01:43 AM.
Old 11-26-2015, 06:31 PM
  #22  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
jleews6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: roanoke virginia
Posts: 1,392
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by CAMSTER
Been working on new project thinking on starting a build thread but too much going on, looks it will dyno in about two weeks so maybe is time.

Car 2011 corvette grand sport torch red / bk int 20,300 present miles.
Heat extractors in stock hood 345 30 19 NTO5R street tires car weight about 3,240 lbs. plus 200 lbs. driver.

Trannie stock A6 paddle shift 3,400 stall Yank LS power adder series converter, B&M super cooler p# 70274.

Stock block, crank, rods, pistons & stock cubes.

Bottom end upgrades.
Patrick G. spec low lash solid roller cam grinded by Danny Griffin.
ARP rod bolts, King bearings, Melling oil pump p#10355 Innovators West harmonic damper.
pistons fly cut .125 valve relieves ptv clearance .057 intake .075 exhaust.
Two 1/4 x 2 1/4 15 lbs. lift in oil pan magnets oil filter and drain plug magnets.
Power Master starter p# 9509
Camster engine evac with modified oil pan.

Top end...
Trick Flow Gen-X 255 ls3 heads 45 cc chambers.
Cometic .045 compressed head gaskets.
T&D 1.8 alum lightened rockers.
Manton 3/8 push rods x 8.100 long .092 wall with .030 oil restrictors.
Modified Holley valve covers for rockers and evac system.
Ls3 ported intake.
Ported ls3 t body.
Vararam ported cold air intake.

Exhaust.
ARH 1 7/8 by 3" collectors and x pipe exhaust.
Corsa sport axel back.

N-A build -no adders.
Cam specs @ .050 .240 / 244 .667 / 667 lift plus 3 /19.2 degrees overlap.
7,100 rpm shift points 7.5 red line.
Compression north of thirteen and a halve.
Tune by David Llerena at kustom tuning
460 gph Walbro in tank E85 fuel pump

Looking for 10.5 street car.
Looking for a 10.5 street car? You should run that with four flat tires.
My friend has a GS and at full weight (he is 280) he has run a best of 10.89@ 125 with 460 rwhp. His car is an automatic also and I believe he has a yank 3400 also. Stock heads and a stock intake ported by Rick crawford.
Old 11-26-2015, 06:35 PM
  #23  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
jleews6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: roanoke virginia
Posts: 1,392
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by DietCoke
Just calling a duck a duck. 570tq out of 364 inches and an absurd horsepower peak at 6300? Sure, I believe the HP # is possible, but not at that rpm.

Maybe even a turducken, I think.
The tq does look a little high but there has been a bunch of SBE ls3s that have hit 520/530 so why cant his car with a solid roller hit 560?
Old 11-26-2015, 06:38 PM
  #24  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
DietCoke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Richmond Hill, GA
Posts: 3,869
Received 56 Likes on 49 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jleews6
The tq does look a little high but there has been a bunch of SBE ls3s that have hit 520/530 so why cant his car with a solid roller hit 560?
Because if the torque is wrong, the horsepower is wrong too. I have no doubts you could make 560, or even 600 out of a stock inch setup. But you arent doing it at 6300 rpm. The auto isnt doing it any favors, I could a the torque spike if it was unlocked converter (but it doesnt look like a converter flash) - but then there's no way in hell it's make that number up top. It just doesn't add up.
Old 11-26-2015, 06:42 PM
  #25  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
DietCoke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Richmond Hill, GA
Posts: 3,869
Received 56 Likes on 49 Posts

Default

In other news, that car should run a lot faster then the 10.50s OP is looking for I think...
Old 11-27-2015, 12:11 AM
  #26  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (7)
 
bongva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CAMSTER
I thought the turducken was constipated but the last time I checked an ls3 had 376 cubic inches you may want to check your turduckens diaper.


Old 11-27-2015, 01:43 AM
  #27  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
DietCoke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Richmond Hill, GA
Posts: 3,869
Received 56 Likes on 49 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CAMSTER
I thought the turducken was constipated but the last time I checked an ls3 had 376 cubic inches you may want to check your turduckens diaper.
Should have just said stock inches. 376, yep. Still calling fruitcake on the whole deal.
Old 11-27-2015, 01:49 PM
  #28  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (66)
 
blk00ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Jasper, AL
Posts: 2,366
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

But how are the real numbers? Track times?
Old 11-27-2015, 05:29 PM
  #29  
TECH Senior Member
 
Jimbo1367's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,910
Received 603 Likes on 479 Posts

Default

LLSR and LS3 heads seem to shine together.
Old 11-29-2015, 12:19 PM
  #30  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,853
Received 315 Likes on 213 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

Originally Posted by DietCoke
Just calling a duck a duck. 570tq out of 376 inches and an absurd horsepower peak at 6300? Sure, I believe the HP # is possible, but not at that rpm.

Maybe even a turducken, I think.
I agree, the torque seems very generous for a 376ci engine, even on E85.

Just for comparisons sake, this is a 403ci LS2 with Dart LS3 heads. Numbers are at the flywheel, not the tires...

Old 11-29-2015, 07:53 PM
  #31  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (33)
 
ramairws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Hicksville MN!
Posts: 1,990
Likes: 0
Received 83 Likes on 59 Posts

Default

Hmmmmmm.............. interesting
Old 11-29-2015, 09:20 PM
  #32  
Launching!
iTrader: (8)
 
carbuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by KCS
I agree, the torque seems very generous for a 376ci engine, even on E85.

Just for comparisons sake, this is a 403ci LS2 with Dart LS3 heads. Numbers are at the flywheel, not the tires...
Any more information you can share on this combination?
Old 11-29-2015, 10:08 PM
  #33  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,853
Received 315 Likes on 213 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

Originally Posted by carbuff
Any more information you can share on this combination?
Little Beast” 707 HP 403” Pump Gas LS2 with LLR & Dart LS3 Heads
Old 11-30-2015, 02:29 AM
  #34  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (66)
 
blk00ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Jasper, AL
Posts: 2,366
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CAMSTER
Little beast 707 / 403 stout numbers for sure.

Now consider this, the chassis dyno at which I dyno my car computes crankshaft tq and hp and the (stock block) crank 376 numbers are;

692.5 tq and 659.6 hp to the crank now lest compare the numbers of the 403 with the little (stock block) 376 ci;

707 div x 403= 1.754 hp x ci assuming 580 tq div x 403=1.439

Here's the little stock bk 376
659.6 div x 376=1.754 hp x ci and 692.5 div x 376= 1.841

The little stock block engine with less than optimum intake manifold and throttle body matched the hp per ci of the 403 to the teeth and darn sure beat it's torq.

Whether on chassis dyno ac belt alternator water pump pulleys and tensioner put the ls3 at a disadvantage is irrelevant in fact we are not even in the same category and yet the stock bk ls3 matched the hp per ci to the teeth and darn sure did better on the tq per ci 1.439 to the ls3 1.841.

What's interesting the 403 in a car with same weight and all else been equal may have met it's match what's more the ball maybe in my park.

This is very significant I like these numbers, watch this...

707 + 580= 1,287

659 + 692= 1,351

I just love working on my car with the Holly Spirit Who shares his wisdom with me.

Kindly, David.
Wow....
Old 11-30-2015, 07:26 AM
  #35  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,853
Received 315 Likes on 213 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

Originally Posted by CAMSTER
The little stock block engine with less than optimum intake manifold and throttle body matched the hp per ci of the 403 to the teeth and darn sure beat it's torq.
Exactly. 1.8ft-lbs per cube? That should be enough of a clue to tell you your numbers are "generous".

Last edited by KCS; 11-30-2015 at 09:10 AM.
Old 11-30-2015, 09:18 AM
  #36  
On The Tree
 
xBoostx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 178
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Name:  LS3%20dyno_zpsw0ct57az.jpg
Views: 1354
Size:  204.0 KB

I am the tuner. I dont understand the skepticism. Here is the dyno graph pulled off the dyno computer. The reason for the toque spike is the converter. If I lock it from the bottom it makes less torque, obviously. If you dont know how a converter works or atleast a good one, I can understand your lack on understanding on the subject.

What the average car guy does not understand is combinations. If all parts work in harmony you'll have a great running motor and it'll make power. If not you'll get average numbers. Camster knows what hes doing. Thats why you see what you now see in front of you. He didnt search the forums and buy parts and hope for the best. Everything done to this car is calculated.

Here is an old build of his. 440 CI N/A. Compression is much less than his LS3. The converter on this run was locked from the bottom. Oh and the car maybe made more power after some subtle changes made later.




So rest assured that what you see is real. Appreciate knowledge and the fact the he shared every detail about it....

Last edited by xBoostx; 11-30-2015 at 09:25 AM.
Old 11-30-2015, 09:24 AM
  #37  
On The Tree
 
xBoostx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 178
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

The only thing not normal on this graph from the usual graph is the way Matt @ Monster Motorsports has his layout. You dont see a 5200rpm crossover cause the scaling of the torque is not even with the horsepower.
Old 11-30-2015, 09:56 AM
  #38  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (66)
 
blk00ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Jasper, AL
Posts: 2,366
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Again wow
Old 11-30-2015, 10:29 AM
  #39  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,853
Received 315 Likes on 213 Posts
LS1Tech 10 Year
Default

Originally Posted by xBoostx
I am the tuner. I dont understand the skepticism.

Blah blah blah...

Appreciate knowledge and the fact the he shared every detail about it....
I'm sorry, I guess the implications weren't clear enough for you guys.

He posted the just the peak numbers and you posted what looks like a cell phone pic of half of a Dyno graph. I think most of us recognized the false peak torque numbers posted by CAMSTER, but the first person to speak up is called a thief...or was it a turducken? I dunno, anyways meanwhile CAMSTER says...

Originally Posted by CAMSTER
I charge the reason for earlier power and high torq to the smaller than originally design intake manifold and throttle body...
So no, it's not that you guys are sharing every detail and people just don't understand what they see. It's just the opposite. You posted inflated torque numbers (caused by the manifold and TB, right?) and only part of a graph and people here picked up on it.

So what now? How about posting the graph with the locked converter?

Also, I have to ask you to change your sig pic as well. Having your web address in it is against our Non-Sponsor Soliciting Policy.

Last edited by KCS; 11-30-2015 at 10:55 AM.
Old 11-30-2015, 11:30 AM
  #40  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (66)
 
blk00ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Jasper, AL
Posts: 2,366
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by CAMSTER
So what now? How about posting the graph with the locked converter?

Auto cars don't run around with locked converter but will post the dyno graph if you post your build graph with SAE numbers like I did.
Lmfao. I'll show you mine if you show me yours! Good lord.


Quick Reply: LLsr heads & cam stk blk e85 ls3 build... Update Dyno#s 560.5 W hp and 575.3 W Torque



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:57 PM.