No recall, GM doesn't care. They deny everything.

I don't buy any of the fancy guide stuff.

 

Are you the same unreal thats on cf? If so I've enjoyed reading your posts over their on CF. Your a very knowledgeable Guy. those guys are lucky to have you there...sadly some wont listen

 

Yep.

I'll be in lakeland a ton over the next 3-4 months. I'll buy you a beer when I'm out there.

 

At the moment I'm in Ohio. Got my grandfathers home. taken some time off to remodel this place. But I'm back an fourth all the time..just let me know when your coming and I will plan around it And look forward to it.

 

CHE has been manufacturing valve train components for over 30 years and manufactures precision valve guides for all applications of racing. CHE has NOT had problems with excessive valve guide wear in ANY application the guides are being properly used in.

The following situations can cause improper wear:

1. The valve manufacturers do not micro polish and coat the valve stems. Several manufacturers have had problems with their stems not being micro polished correctly, and then put a CRN coating on them. If the valve stem is rough and is then coated, the valve stem will act like a file, and it will destroy any manufactured guide in a short time.
2. If the valve train geometry is not checked when putting in a larger cam, it can cause extensive valve guide clearance in a short period of time.
3. Improper initial guide clearance from the start can also cause the guide to wear out prematurely.
Should you have any questions regarding our valve train components, we are more than happy to answer via email or phone at 805-499-8885.

 

Can't believe there are no Flow #s Yet!

 

The guides in my own heads are che guides and are toast in short order 10k miles with full roller setup an valve train geometry was checked. still out of spec. not saying the guide is at fault. but when an oil change almost out last the guides in the heads theirs a problem

 

I've always been skeptical of offset rockers in true wedge design heads. Wonder if GM decided to slightly cant the new LT stuff to thwart this ugliness ????

 

A little over 9 minutes in, they use the LS7 engine, they show a little bit on how they
make the intake manifold runners, which I thought was pretty interesting.

 

I dont have the sheet but was over 400 cfm intake..will have track times and trap speeds before an after. should be firing up any day now

 

dyno numbers..mustang dyno..

 

631/539 to the wheels on pump 93..I'll take this as a win.lol kpa is dropping hard up top to 94. throttle body may be starving for air..more is left

 

Congrats. That's impressive as hell. Can you share any details on the rest of the combination?

 

here is the set up at the moment...as far as i know this is the first of its kind..was tuned for speed density as well. as of now the intake has not been ported. but thats gonna change next week

 

Very nice, my C5Z was at about 94KPA up top too with the ported MSD 102, and NW 102 TB.

Looking forward to your results with the intake porting.

 

Me to here is the intake from top veiw thats on the car now..gonna do something like this. i did to another car few years back. top picture on the car bottom ported carb intake



another from top throttle body view. you can see where hangs in some



and what i have in mind

 

I can pull at least 15-20hp on the intake

 

Nice.

Should be in Lakeland mid Feb. I'll let you know.

If I was going to do an intake on my car ever, would probably be that with a low profile elbow.

 

Here is the intake pics i just finished few hrs ago..was on a time crunch as Ian will be at tx2k march 14 ..this should help..








Had to notch top of intake and then match the spacer





and intake before

 

Sorry guys i keep loading pics get dbbl posts then i delete one then both are gone..I'll try one more time...


2" inch spacer used



had to notch top of intake for throttle body and spacer as well





Plate made for 102 throttle body