LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

diff connecting rod lengths make ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-03-2010, 07:03 PM
  #1  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
9D4Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Stow Ohio
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Question diff connecting rod lengths make ?

want to build a forged bottom end in 94 Z. 5.7 or 6.0 rod length ? what difference does the length make in performance ? thanks for your help t
Old 07-03-2010, 07:05 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
RamAir95TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 9,467
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

What stroke? Any boost? More details needed.
Old 07-03-2010, 07:09 PM
  #3  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
 
GrahamHill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: northeast Miss.
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

6 has been the rule of thumb for 350, 383, and 400 SBC combos for a long long time. Almost everyone who builds rods offers one because its very common choice for a little extra performance with no real sacrafice. Little less side loading on the piston, overall better rod length/stroke ratio versus stock, and I think they even help the piston dwell time at TDC.

You have to buy rods anyway so get the 6" rods. No real cost difference and they're worth a horsepower or 10, or 15.
Old 07-03-2010, 08:42 PM
  #4  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (3)
 
stryker1320's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Muncie Dragway....Indiana
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I was always under the impression that there really is not any "performance" gain. The only thing rod length really effects is the side loading ant the valve timing events, which in effects the dynamic compression ratio. For everything I have ever read, there has been a big debate on whether or not any performance value could really be had on a longer rod or not. Not just this site, but on other engine building sites as well.

But then again I may be way off....
Old 07-04-2010, 12:37 AM
  #5  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
 
Wicked94Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Spokane, Wa
Posts: 3,725
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

depends on what you're trying to do with the motor. N/A get the ring pack up high on the piston, and run the shortest CH you can. Rod length is whatever you're left with. Honestly with a low rpm steel rod motor I don't think there's any advantage running a long rod, and definitely no advantage in the pocket book with a custom piston/rod length.
Old 07-05-2010, 09:24 PM
  #6  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
 
GrahamHill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: northeast Miss.
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

With a 6" rod you probably wont have to grind on the crankshaft to clear the counterweights to the bottom of the piston
Old 07-08-2010, 07:52 PM
  #7  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
nickp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Southern Michigan
Posts: 412
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts

Default

for a 3.48" stroke, I would definetly go with 6" rods.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:05 PM.