LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

160 thermostat question/discussion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-07-2010, 07:18 PM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Adam1203's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 548
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default 160 thermostat question/discussion

alright so i was at work the other day and i was talking to some of the guys about cars and i mentioned i was considering switching to a 160 t-stat. I got a reply from a guy the it would create condensation and water contamination in the oil and then lead to oil slugging. i called bs and it turned into a pretty lengthy discussion. i could be wrong i have never heard or seen it.

me and my father ran a small buisness for a while with several trucks. the only time i have seen engine slugging was in the tbi 350 trucks we had more specifically the two 92 gmcs and i figured it was from the trucks working so hard. as i understood it engine slugging only came from extreme heat breaking down the oil. i know that when water and oil mix you can kinda get a white puss like substance but thats not what we are talking about.

so what do you think? do you guys say bs?
Old 08-07-2010, 07:20 PM
  #2  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
FirebirdSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Midwest
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I had my doubts about a 160 thermo until i tried it. Even with it my engine still sits at 170 on a real cool night and 180s on hot days.
160 is just were is starts to open, not where it sits.
edit: this is on a ls1, didnt read the section but shouldnt be much different.
Old 08-07-2010, 07:31 PM
  #3  
TECH Veteran
 
shbox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 4,116
Received 50 Likes on 44 Posts

Default

You have nothing to worry about with an LT1 and a 160° thermostat. If you live where it gets real cold, you can easily swap back to a 180° in the winter.
Old 08-07-2010, 07:36 PM
  #4  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
speed_demon24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 4,609
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Adam1203
alright so i was at work the other day and i was talking to some of the guys about cars and i mentioned i was considering switching to a 160 t-stat. I got a reply from a guy the it would create condensation and water contamination in the oil and then lead to oil slugging. i called bs and it turned into a pretty lengthy discussion. i could be wrong i have never heard or seen it.

me and my father ran a small buisness for a while with several trucks. the only time i have seen engine slugging was in the tbi 350 trucks we had more specifically the two 92 gmcs and i figured it was from the trucks working so hard. as i understood it engine slugging only came from extreme heat breaking down the oil. i know that when water and oil mix you can kinda get a white puss like substance but thats not what we are talking about.

so what do you think? do you guys say bs?
You want the oil to get hot enough to burn off all the moisture in it. My oil temperature with a 160 degree thermostat still hits 210-220 under normal driving. I forgot what it gets to in the winter, but we don't have a real winter in florida so...
Old 08-07-2010, 07:48 PM
  #5  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (246)
 
robsquikz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago/Crown point
Posts: 4,987
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

ADAM you will be just fine.
Old 08-07-2010, 08:11 PM
  #6  
On The Tree
 
Wyocattech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Douglas, WY
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yeah wont have any problems with it. Mine runs around 175-180. My oil samples show no water in them. Oil temp is usually warmer then water temp anyways.
Old 08-07-2010, 09:48 PM
  #7  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (51)
 
projectX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: MI
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

If your really worried about it get a 180 or just have a tune to turn your fans on at 160/180.
Old 08-08-2010, 07:17 AM
  #8  
On The Tree
iTrader: (7)
 
SSweet97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I've had one on my SS for seven years now with no problem whatsoever. I'm here in Fla. and you know how hot it gets, my thermostat is peged at 180*
Old 08-08-2010, 07:53 AM
  #9  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (12)
 
wrd1972's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Central Kentucky
Posts: 4,649
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I have a 160 stat and my temps are 194-200 all the time.
Old 08-08-2010, 09:38 AM
  #10  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Peopl;e who think bad things about a 160 stat in a LT1 are applying old school knowledge to a newer cooling system design.

A 160 stat in a early 90s TBI motor would not even allow it to get into closed loop operation and DID cause problems. Ask your friend what the stock stat was and I bet he SWEARS it had to be a 195.

Because of the reverse flow cooling a 180 stat in a LT1 results in similar cylinder temps as a 195 in a gen 1, so running a 160 in a LT1 is nowhere near as drastic as a 160 in a gen 1, the cylinder calls and bottom of the block still stay nice and warm but you keep the heads cool.

All that said I am not convinced the 160stat is the wonderful mod it is claimed to be on the forums. The more I learn the less faith I put in "conventional wisdom" and popular parts or vendors.
Old 08-08-2010, 09:40 AM
  #11  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by wrd1972
I have a 160 stat and my temps are 194-200 all the time.

Based on datamaster or the dash??? If the thing reads 194+ with a 160 stat and a mechanical waterpump there is a problem somewhere. If you have an electric waterpump that is just the low flow showing up.

My cars always ran 195-200 with a 180 stat.
Old 08-08-2010, 02:45 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
killagt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,737
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Here I what I alway do, 160 for summer, and 180 for winter. But im thinking running 160 year round, if you drive your car hard and long, you wont have problem with those thing you worried about.
Old 08-08-2010, 02:58 PM
  #13  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
speed_demon24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 4,609
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 96capricemgr
Based on datamaster or the dash??? If the thing reads 194+ with a 160 stat and a mechanical waterpump there is a problem somewhere. If you have an electric waterpump that is just the low flow showing up.

My cars always ran 195-200 with a 180 stat.
In the summer my car gets up to 190 in the city with a 160 thermostat and a becool radiator.
Old 08-08-2010, 06:22 PM
  #14  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (12)
 
wrd1972's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Central Kentucky
Posts: 4,649
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 96capricemgr
Based on datamaster or the dash??? If the thing reads 194+ with a 160 stat and a mechanical waterpump there is a problem somewhere. If you have an electric waterpump that is just the low flow showing up.

My cars always ran 195-200 with a 180 stat.
^ Scanmaster. Could have something to do with the DC of the fans.
Old 08-08-2010, 09:32 PM
  #15  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

Must be a difference in airflow across the b-body and f-body radiators, b-bodies don't run that warm with a 160 stat even with a potent motor.
Old 08-08-2010, 11:42 PM
  #16  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
l 95 Trans Am l's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 653
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Id like to get into this topic a bit, but i think itd be thread jacking Anyways my 95 Trans Am seems to get real hot, its around 80-90 degrees here in PA right now, and in stop and go, it gets almost to the line in between 210 and 260, then when i get it running and air flowing it gets to 210 but shouldnt it still be lower? I plan on geting the computer tuned and get a 160 just to be safe.
Old 08-09-2010, 12:33 AM
  #17  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (6)
 
speed_demon24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 4,609
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 96capricemgr
Must be a difference in airflow across the b-body and f-body radiators, b-bodies don't run that warm with a 160 stat even with a potent motor.
I just found out my radiator cap was never sealing at the top so I'm sure that has something to do with it. My radiator is 4-5" below the top.
Old 08-09-2010, 12:44 AM
  #18  
Staging Lane
 
Nomind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Elizabethtown, KY
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by l 95 Trans Am l
Id like to get into this topic a bit, but i think itd be thread jacking Anyways my 95 Trans Am seems to get real hot, its around 80-90 degrees here in PA right now, and in stop and go, it gets almost to the line in between 210 and 260, then when i get it running and air flowing it gets to 210 but shouldnt it still be lower? I plan on geting the computer tuned and get a 160 just to be safe.
Are you basing this on the dash gauge, as that could be inaccurate? My 95 T/A gets pretty warm, real quick in stop and go traffic, I believe it's just a function of the airflow over the radiator design, and a slightly larger stall. However, when I get going again, it cools back down to the lower, middle line. This has been in the 90+ days in KY. I'd check for obstructions in the radiator. When I had to replace the opti in mine, I took an air hose to the fins on the radiator, to try and get some of the crap out of it. Lots of sand, dirt, and small debris. May also want to replace the radiator cap.
Old 08-09-2010, 05:41 AM
  #19  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Adam1203's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 548
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by l 95 Trans Am l
Id like to get into this topic a bit, but i think itd be thread jacking
go for it.
Old 08-09-2010, 05:46 AM
  #20  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Adam1203's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 548
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 96capricemgr
Must be a difference in airflow across the b-body and f-body radiators, b-bodies don't run that warm with a 160 stat even with a potent motor.
on the highway you should run about 160 with a 160 stat. but in the city its all going to depend on what your fans are set at and what there capable of cooling.

the late year lt1s have a better fan set up. in 1993 and 94 they had one high speed fan and one low speed fan. in 1995 and up they changed it so both fans ran and were both able to do low and high speed. i read that on shbox.com


im curious to know if it could create engine slugging.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:36 PM.