PCM Diagnostics & Tuning HP Tuners | Holley | Diablo
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

PE vs RPM multiplier question.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-27-2004, 04:57 PM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
HellOnWeelz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default PE vs RPM multiplier question.

For all of you LS1EDIT gurus , is the multiplier value that you use to tune WOT linear with respect to AFR? In other words, if I increase the multiplier by 2% at a given RPM, will I get a 2% richer AFR at that RPM? My gut tells me no especially if the injectors are different, but I am not sure. What is the verdict? If not does anyone know the function for a stock 1999 fuel system?

I am preparing myself for a tuning session at the dyno and I would like: 1. To be in the ballpark. 2. To have a method figured out ahead of time to maximize my dyno time. Thanks
Old 01-27-2004, 05:09 PM
  #2  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
1fastWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,461
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

From what I've been told -yes- it is for small changes (<10%) then it starts to deviate. So, if you're 13.5:1 on the dyno and want to get to 12.5:1, you'll want to increase the PE multiplier by 8% or so. This should get you pretty close.
Old 01-28-2004, 12:19 PM
  #3  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
HellOnWeelz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 1fastWS6
From what I've been told -yes- it is for small changes (<10%) then it starts to deviate. So, if you're 13.5:1 on the dyno and want to get to 12.5:1, you'll want to increase the PE multiplier by 8% or so. This should get you pretty close.

Thanks, makes sense.
Old 01-28-2004, 06:27 PM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (59)
 
MIGHTYMOUSE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 10,010
Received 45 Likes on 31 Posts

Default

the number is a divsor to calculate target air fuel ratio..

if you're using say 1.2403 as a value then take your stoich ratio on the main fuel table (should be14.737) and divide by 1.2403.. thats = 11.88:1 and that is your target ratio.. if your engine coolant temperature is outside of normal operating temperatures then it gets affected by the temperature adder (add the amount to the rpm number)

if the 11.8 turns out to be 12.0 a/f on the dyno etc. just keep that linear relationship in mind during adjustments (aim .2 low etc.)

if you are looking for max hp then you are looking for something on the par of 12.5 to .8 on the dyno but every car is different.

as you see the stock computer sets up slightly rich for safety.
Old 01-29-2004, 02:10 PM
  #5  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
HellOnWeelz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MIGHTYMOUSE
the number is a divsor to calculate target air fuel ratio..

if you're using say 1.2403 as a value then take your stoich ratio on the main fuel table (should be14.737) and divide by 1.2403.. thats = 11.88:1 and that is your target ratio.. if your engine coolant temperature is outside of normal operating temperatures then it gets affected by the temperature adder (add the amount to the rpm number)

if the 11.8 turns out to be 12.0 a/f on the dyno etc. just keep that linear relationship in mind during adjustments (aim .2 low etc.)

if you are looking for max hp then you are looking for something on the par of 12.5 to .8 on the dyno but every car is different.

as you see the stock computer sets up slightly rich for safety.
Now that makes sense to me. That would also explain why you may want to "reduce" the multiplier in order to get to ~12.8. Because the AFR was already richer than the 12.8 initially.

So my stock settings are 1.2403 across the board, and the stoich ratio is 14.7. The wide band AFR shows me at 13.8 ish. That puts me nearly 2 points leaner than stock?? Seems a bit much but I guess I could have freed up 15% more air for WOT operation with cold air, 85mm MAF and ported TB. So by this logic the 1.2403 is acting more like 1.0652, the difference is .1751. If I added .1751 to the 1.2403 I should be back to 11.8ish number? But I really want 12.8 so I should add .0876. Looks good in theory. I'll try it and see what happens. Thanks a lot.

And in the end both of you are saying the same thing, and supporting stories is always good

Last edited by HellOnWeelz; 01-29-2004 at 02:19 PM.
Old 01-29-2004, 03:58 PM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (59)
 
MIGHTYMOUSE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 10,010
Received 45 Likes on 31 Posts

Default

sounds like a plan. just be careful with large changes.



Quick Reply: PE vs RPM multiplier question.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:28 AM.