LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Comp Ultra Pro RR vs Crane Gold

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-11-2011, 06:41 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
mixtape's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Comp Ultra Pro RR vs Crane Gold

Hey guys, time for 1.6RRs to accompany the Crane 227 cam and 10309-1 kit going onto my Impala SS motor (time to replace the stock Z28 motor, see video). I was planning on going with Crane Golds since they've been proven with a great rep by many users, but I've also heard fantastic things about these newer style Ultra Pro RRs. Especially the fact that the Ultra Pros are supposed to be super quiet.

So are those Comp Ultra Pro Mags (1605-16) self aligning? I was looking into the Crane Gold (10758-16) RRs at first, but changed my mind when I heard about the Ultras. and then when I was considering getting the Ultras, I heard that the Ultras were not SA while the Crane Golds were. So it's been back and forth . I would really prefer to stay away from NSA since it adds more complexity to the mix.

For what it's worth, I will most likely run the iron head from an Impala SS LT1 for a year while I save up for Lloyd Elliot heads. My stock z28 motor is in pretty bad shape (see video), so I'm probably not swapping over any questionable parts to my Impala long block. Even though I could save a good amount of weight doing so. Just not worth the risk.

Any help is appreciated! I want to buy RRs this weekend.

Here's a video of the stock engine. Don't worry, the Impala SS long block is in the garage getting a cam, valve springs, and 1.6RRs . This Camaro is far from retirement .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mrSsxY8pZso
Old 07-11-2011, 07:25 PM
  #2  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
 
95sscamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: West Palm Beach
Posts: 874
Received 506 Likes on 203 Posts

Default

Comp Ultra Pro Mags
Old 07-11-2011, 07:29 PM
  #3  
TECH Regular
 
food nd cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yes the ultra pro mags are SA. I am about to install a batch this week.
Old 07-11-2011, 08:57 PM
  #4  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
mixtape's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks guys

Originally Posted by food nd cars
Yes the ultra pro mags are SA. I am about to install a batch this week.
Do you happen to have the part number for the Ultra Pro Mags you have? I checked the Summit website and compared the two here. I put a red circle around the areas that I'm confused about.

Thanks again for all the help!

Old 07-11-2011, 10:43 PM
  #5  
TECH Veteran
 
shbox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 4,116
Received 50 Likes on 44 Posts

Default

The above Comps won't work for two reasons:
-not self-aligniing
-not for 3/8" stud

NSA or SA depends on which you order. Look into the 1618-16 for SA 3/8. However, if you are going to do LE heads later, you might have wished you got rockers for 7/16" studs and NSA (but they aren't going to work on the Impy heads). I also have not heard that the UltraPro Mags were really any quieter than the Pro Mags.
Old 07-11-2011, 10:54 PM
  #6  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
mixtape's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by shbox
The above Comps won't work for two reasons:
-not self-aligniing
-not for 3/8" stud

NSA or SA depends on which you order. Look into the 1618-16 for SA 3/8. However, if you are going to do LE heads later, you might have wished you got rockers for 7/16" studs and NSA (but they aren't going to work on the Impy heads). I also have not heard that the UltraPro Mags were really any quieter than the Pro Mags.
Hey, thanks! Awesome info. I saw the 1618-16's on the Comp website actually, but they're rated at 1.52 instead of the 1.6 of the 1605-16 kit. I mean 1.52RRs are better than what's on the motor now (stock), but I don't think it'll beat the Golds and their 1.6 ratio spec.

As bad as it sounds, I rather cut corners now and use the 3/8", instead of swapping over the questionable aluminum head I have and going 7/16". Last thing I want is to transfer over my headaches lol. Plus I can always sell the RRs I get this week for something else next year when I do decide to go LE.
Old 07-12-2011, 12:33 AM
  #7  
TECH Regular
 
food nd cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/CCA-1618-16/

These will work fine with your future LE setup
Old 07-12-2011, 07:55 AM
  #8  
TECH Veteran
 
shbox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 4,116
Received 50 Likes on 44 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mixtape
Hey, thanks! Awesome info. I saw the 1618-16's on the Comp website actually, but they're rated at 1.52 instead of the 1.6 of the 1605-16 kit. I mean 1.52RRs are better than what's on the motor now (stock), but I don't think it'll beat the Golds and their 1.6 ratio spec.

As bad as it sounds, I rather cut corners now and use the 3/8", instead of swapping over the questionable aluminum head I have and going 7/16". Last thing I want is to transfer over my headaches lol. Plus I can always sell the RRs I get this week for something else next year when I do decide to go LE.
There is apparently some mixup. Everybody but Comp says they are 1.6 ratio.
Old 07-12-2011, 08:48 AM
  #9  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
 
quik95lt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 4,464
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

i ran those crane's on my HR 355 for a long time.........awesome rocker!!!!!!! never had any issues with them at all..........the comp is a good offering as well but for your applicaiton like shbox said the comp wont work your ticket is the cranes
Old 07-12-2011, 09:05 AM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (11)
 
defaultexistence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: fort walton beach,fl
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i have the SA golds on my DD, they are quiet ,3/8 ,no probs for 6months so far ...running at zero lash and 3/4 turn
Old 07-12-2011, 10:39 AM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
Gojira94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Clayton, NC
Posts: 1,197
Received 36 Likes on 32 Posts

Default

I love my UPMs. The 1605-16s are not self-aligning. However, guide plates are cheap and not hard to incorporate. 7/16" studs are also relatively inexpensive. Figure an extra $100-120.00 to do guide plates and some ARP or Comp 7/16 studs with a guide plate locator shank. When doing guide plates, it's important to choose a stud that has enough length to get past the thickness of the guide plate into the head. IIRC, I used the Comp 4512-16 studs. They're 1.9" long overall and specified for BBC. The base threads in LT1 heads are 7/16" & 14 thread pitch, even on the stock studs. Only the part that sticks up is reduced to 3/8" on a stock offering. So 7/16" with a little extra on the bottom (.15") is about right to secire the stud in the head past the guide plate.

I can hear my UPMs at cruising speeds. Sounds like a faint sewing machine noise. I'm using them with 875-16 lifters (Type 'R'). They're 1/8-1/4 turn past zero lash and transfer energy to the valve train very well. Also using Magnum pushrods (about $85.00). My measurement was nearly perfect 7.2" with very light resurfacing on the heads and a .040" gasket so I just threw stock length 7.2" in it. Very happy with the way it came out. I used Comp 4800-8 raised plates, but flat is fine, too. For the relatively small extra expense, it's worth pursuing a NSA setup.

EDIT: re-reading SHBox's post, I did not realize that Impala heads are not 7/16" base thread. My mistake. I thought all LT1 heads, Aluminum and iron alike had 7/16" 14 pitch base threads...
Old 07-12-2011, 11:12 AM
  #12  
TECH Veteran
 
shbox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 4,116
Received 50 Likes on 44 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Gojira94
...

EDIT: re-reading SHBox's post, I did not realize that Impala heads are not 7/16" base thread. My mistake. I thought all LT1 heads, Aluminum and iron alike had 7/16" 14 pitch base threads...
The cast iron head have pressed in 3/8" studs. Machine work is required to go to screw in studs.
Old 07-12-2011, 02:59 PM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
nitrous2fast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,084
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by shbox
There is apparently some mixup. Everybody but Comp says they are 1.6 ratio.
Comp has them in 1.52 ratios as well as 1.6 ratio...
Old 07-12-2011, 03:42 PM
  #14  
TECH Veteran
 
shbox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 4,116
Received 50 Likes on 44 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by nitrous2fast
Comp has them in 1.52 ratios as well as 1.6 ratio...
I know that, but the confusion is the same part number is listed as both 1.52 and 1.6.
Old 07-12-2011, 03:51 PM
  #15  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (8)
 
jlpz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Texas.
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have the 1.6 ratio Ultra pro mags waiting to go on...nice part imo very well made. I went with the 1618 part number listed. I went with self align because I wanted to less of a hassle..
Old 07-12-2011, 05:59 PM
  #16  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
RamAir95TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 9,467
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Been running the same Crane Gold 1.6 / 7/16" rockers for 7 years now...
Old 07-12-2011, 06:29 PM
  #17  
Moderator
iTrader: (33)
 
BizZzatch350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: T E X A S
Posts: 9,787
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

I have the Crane Golds on mine, they were in a car before me and worked fine in that car, work fine on my TA.
Old 07-12-2011, 06:49 PM
  #18  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
mixtape's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thank you guys for all the great input! They both seem like great choices where I can't really go wrong either way. However, I found a deal on the Crane Golds (10758-16) for $280 shipped. They were apparently used for only a few hours before the guy's Suburban engine blew due to bad machine shop work (tough deal ).

Originally Posted by shbox
I know that, but the confusion is the same part number is listed as both 1.52 and 1.6.
I find it strange that Comp did this. I'm sure it was in error, but that's a pretty noticeable error not to catch lol.

Lastly, I think shbox mentioned that machine work would be required to run the Ultra Pro Mags on an iron head, but will the Crane Golds also require machine work? As in, do the Ultra Pros and Golds both need machining to work on iron heads?

Sorry if I'm wording it poorly, but basically, if the iron heads have pressed in rocker studs, will the Crane Golds (10758-16) need any machining to work on the Impala head?

Thanks guy!
Old 07-12-2011, 09:49 PM
  #19  
TECH Veteran
 
shbox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 4,116
Received 50 Likes on 44 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mixtape
Thank you guys for all the great input! They both seem like great choices where I can't really go wrong either way. However, I found a deal on the Crane Golds (10758-16) for $280 shipped. They were apparently used for only a few hours before the guy's Suburban engine blew due to bad machine shop work (tough deal ).


I find it strange that Comp did this. I'm sure it was in error, but that's a pretty noticeable error not to catch lol.

Lastly, I think shbox mentioned that machine work would be required to run the Ultra Pro Mags on an iron head, but will the Crane Golds also require machine work? As in, do the Ultra Pros and Golds both need machining to work on iron heads?

Sorry if I'm wording it poorly, but basically, if the iron heads have pressed in rocker studs, will the Crane Golds (10758-16) need any machining to work on the Impala head?

Thanks guy!
It takes machining to convert to screw in studs on an iron head is what I was saying. If you want to run 3/8" stud rockers (Crane or Comp), you just slap them on (with springs that support them, of course).
Old 07-12-2011, 10:05 PM
  #20  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
mixtape's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by shbox
It takes machining to convert to screw in studs on an iron head is what I was saying. If you want to run 3/8" stud rockers (Crane or Comp), you just slap them on (with springs that support them, of course).
Ohh, I misread. Glad to hear that! I was hoping not to have to machine the iron heads as that would greatly eat up my budget for the repairs. Thank you!



Quick Reply: Comp Ultra Pro RR vs Crane Gold



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:20 PM.