Generation III External Engine LS1 | LS6 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

intake on 5.3L?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-07-2013, 09:05 PM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
ls1adamls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: san jose, ca
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default intake on 5.3L?

i have done some researching since im planning to put a 5.3l in my lt1 bird.
I have seen mixed reviews but mostly pointing to the ls6 intake being the better choice over the ls1 and ls2 intake, are there any other good options?
also im trying to stay smog legal, so I was thinking a baby cam and some smog legal shorty headers. im aiming for 400whp
I will be converting the car over to a 6 speed as well.

Last edited by ls1adamls1; 06-08-2013 at 12:12 AM.
Old 06-08-2013, 03:05 AM
  #2  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (15)
 
tsench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lufkin TX moving to Canada
Posts: 821
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

love your sig
i would stick to the truck intake if it fit
Old 06-08-2013, 06:59 AM
  #3  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
garys 68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Camdenton, MO
Posts: 3,706
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes on 31 Posts

Default

Keep in mind the LS6 intake performs better on the larger 5.7 LS1. The smaller 5.3 will do fine with an LS1 intake and will be about $300 less. Also will fit under your hood.
400 rwhp, smog legal will be difficult, go with a 6.0 if you need 400hp at the wheels.
But a 5.3 with just a cam can generate some nice hp, see this thread.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/conversio...n-ls-swap.html
Old 06-08-2013, 10:28 AM
  #4  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
ls1adamls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: san jose, ca
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i could port the heads to get some more power out of it, even if i hit 370whp id be happy with that.
i had an ls1 Camaro with minor bolt ons with ms4 cam and ls1 intake and put down 399rwhp.
Old 06-09-2013, 07:23 AM
  #5  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
garys 68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Camdenton, MO
Posts: 3,706
Likes: 0
Received 32 Likes on 31 Posts

Default

Well, the 5.3 is smaller and has lower compression. IMHO chasing the last few hp at 6000 rpm generally is not worth the effort.
Btw, if you have a 400hp goal, why not use a 6.0 instead of a 5.3? An LQ9 is at 400 crank hp with almost no mods.
http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/e...#ixzz21ehbAsre
Old 06-09-2013, 10:02 AM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (9)
 
ls1adamls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: san jose, ca
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I might go ahead and sell the 5.3 for a 6.0
the cost of a 6.0l around here are around 1400 bucks, and at that price I can find an ls1 that don't need any mods to fit in the car.



Quick Reply: intake on 5.3L?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:00 AM.