Wideband Oxy sensor as primary
#1
Wideband Oxy sensor as primary
Is there any downside/upside to running wideband sensors all the time? Will it confuse the PCM or will it provide opportunites for better all around performance?
#2
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OK how do you mean? You can't just hook up a wideband to the stock PCM and have it run all gravy. Your car is not setup to use wideband input, hence the use of narrowband O2s. If you want, hook up FAST or MS or all the other crazy stuff. That's wideband engine management. Otherwise, if you have a standalone unit, then run it as often as you like, it'll have nothing to do with your PCM.
#3
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by txhorns281
OK how do you mean? You can't just hook up a wideband to the stock PCM and have it run all gravy. Your car is not setup to use wideband input, hence the use of narrowband O2s. If you want, hook up FAST or MS or all the other crazy stuff. That's wideband engine management. Otherwise, if you have a standalone unit, then run it as often as you like, it'll have nothing to do with your PCM.
#4
Originally Posted by Bryan Wilkinson
That is not exactly true, Using the PLX wideband controllers, you can use the wideband to feed the stock PCM. The stock PCM will recieve a Narrow band signal but it is much more detailed in its results.
FJO has the same. Wideband O2 with narrowband waveform output to the PCM.
#5
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bryan Wilkinson
That is not exactly true, Using the PLX wideband controllers, you can use the wideband to feed the stock PCM. The stock PCM will recieve a Narrow band signal but it is much more detailed in its results.
Besides, the narrowband signal is still only used at part throttle closed loop operation. Outside of that, you may have good data, but that data is ignored by the PCM as far as controlling fueling functions.
To answer the question though, there will be no confusion by the PCM since it does not truly accept wideband input. This narrowband conversion just allows for more accurate stoich detection but as far as the PCM is concerned there is no data acquisition at WOT. From a tuning standpoint though, this will help solidify the correlation b/w narrowband MV and true AFR. And if using any other standalone wideband, it operates completely independent of your EFI system.
Last edited by txhorns281; 05-08-2005 at 12:32 AM.
#6
The LM-1 and LC-1 have dual outputs for just this purpose. One defaults to "Narowband Simulation" mode and the other is for driving a Gage or ECU. You can actually change the switching point of the narrowband simulation to values other than 14.7:1 to fool the ECU.
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by slow
Do you think a $35 "wideband" sensor is really more accurate at 14.64 than a $80 factory sensor, that is designed to just be accurate in that switching range?
Ryan
Ryan
2nd if you are paying $80.00 for factory sensors you are buying in the wrong place.
Here is how it works.
A "Factory" narrow band sensor can read 10.1 to 20.1 A/F the problem is that it has a very narrow range of accuracy and when the PCM reads that voltage it is either on or off Or being 14.7 which is Stoichiometric pernounced sto-key-a-metric.
With a narrow band sensor the voltage range is 1 volt to 0 volts. as an example .900 may be 19:1 A/F and .100 may be 10:1. You can read it that way and you can actually see that with HP Tuners in the histogram when monitoring the narrow band field.
A Wideband is a 5 volt sensor allowing for a much more usable voltage range. That voltage range is then in turn converted to a ratio rich or lean.
It is the same principle as the difference between a 1 bar map sensor reading 5 volts and a 3 bar reading the same 5 volt range. You lose resolution. Most Wideband sensors range in price anywhere from $80.00 to $500. depending on how many wires, and if it is a heated or non heated unit.
Hope that helps the confusion.
#9
As far as accuracy goes, the narrowband sensors are only accurate RIGHT AT stochiometric. That is their switching point. It is inherant in the chemistry of the sensor. The voltage range of the narrowband sensor is almost meaningless except that it switches polarity with respect to it's 1/2 scale output at exactly 14.7AFR. By how many millivlots it does this is dependant on AFR, EGT and exhaust backpressure. The "linear range" is just the effect of an instability. i.e. 900mV can mean almost any AFR depending on what the exhaust temperature and backpressure are at any given time. I know... I've tested it.
The "output" of a wideband sensor is the same as a narrowband sensor. It is the wideband controller that outputs 0-5v. The 0-5v that the controller outputs is proportional to the current that the contrroller has to apply to the sensor's pump cell to get the narrowband element inside the wideband sensor to switch on and off.
A couple months ago, i described how these things work internally. Since I am WAY too lazy to type all that again, here it is:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...5&page=4&pp=20
need to scroll down a bit.
The cheapest wideband controller is probably the LC-1 $149 w/o the sensor or $199 w/ sensor.
The "output" of a wideband sensor is the same as a narrowband sensor. It is the wideband controller that outputs 0-5v. The 0-5v that the controller outputs is proportional to the current that the contrroller has to apply to the sensor's pump cell to get the narrowband element inside the wideband sensor to switch on and off.
A couple months ago, i described how these things work internally. Since I am WAY too lazy to type all that again, here it is:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/showthrea...5&page=4&pp=20
need to scroll down a bit.
The cheapest wideband controller is probably the LC-1 $149 w/o the sensor or $199 w/ sensor.
#10
TECH Senior Member
Originally Posted by Bryan Wilkinson
Where in the world are you buying wideband sensors for $35.00?
the Bosch LSU4.2 sensors that most widebands seem to be using are only about 35... I picked up a few a while back for 40 or so each shipped
1stvwparts.com seems to be pretty popular for them
dr. mike, excellent info, Thanks!, dunno why I didn't see this the first time. I'm going to add your posts to the main sticky on this section as that is some very interesting information about wideband sensors and the LM-1
Last edited by horist; 05-08-2005 at 08:02 PM.
#11
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
Can you tell me where to look for GM sensors for less than $75 then I was using prices I can get parts from dealers for. Sensors for my car I was told around $80, rear vette sensors for around $100 each
The VW sensor for my Lm1 i got a replacement for around 35.
I normally use sensors a lot more expensive for widebands, with a afm1000 being the norm.
I don't see closed loop working well with a wideband setup as a narrow band, as the pcm expects to see the voltage swing rich, lean, rich, lean. where a wideband will not have the same swinging, or even be fast enough to simulate a narrowband o2's output.
Ryan
The VW sensor for my Lm1 i got a replacement for around 35.
I normally use sensors a lot more expensive for widebands, with a afm1000 being the norm.
I don't see closed loop working well with a wideband setup as a narrow band, as the pcm expects to see the voltage swing rich, lean, rich, lean. where a wideband will not have the same swinging, or even be fast enough to simulate a narrowband o2's output.
Ryan
#13
I don't see closed loop working well with a wideband setup as a narrow band, as the pcm expects to see the voltage swing rich, lean, rich, lean. where a wideband will not have the same swinging, or even be fast enough to simulate a narrowband o2's output.
Most widebands are slow though. That's why it's best to use an LM-1 ( 100 samples per second ) or LC-1 ( 200 samples per second ). Thats faster than the ECU/PCM samples the narrowband input. Some other widebands, which shall remain nameless, can take 3 or 4 seconds to settle on an AFR value. The additional delay in the PCM's PID loop can cause overshoot/oscillation in the actual mixture.
#14
Staging Lane
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Plano, Texas
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
On a semi-related topic, can you post links to current wideband O2 measurement vendors?
I know of this one: http://www.innovatemotorsports.com/
Others?
I know of this one: http://www.innovatemotorsports.com/
Others?