weatherkid

Hey i just had my 95 camaro dynoed after i put my motor back in. shouldnt i have more torque? I ran it on a Mustang Dynomometer at vector motorsports and it put down 369 hp and 337 tq.

some engine mods are: 4 bolt splayed caps, forged internals, stock ported heads with 1.55 and 2.00 valves, 1.6rr's, intake port matched to heads and TB 58mm holley, comp cams 230/236 .570/.576 on a 113 lsa, coated pacesetter long tubes, magnaflow cat-back, K&N FIPK, 36lb injectors, and a vigilanti 3200 that just burned up my trans.

1redta

is it tuned? but yes you would think it would be more

jm93camaro

iTrader: (2)

Wow, those are some pretty sad numbers for your setup. You said your trans is burn't up now? I'm thinking that could have had an effect on your outcome. Your torque numbers are alittle low in my opinion which leads me to believe that your transmission is the culprit.

streetwarrior96

who did the porting on your heads.. Kinda have the same setup look at my setup.

Niteninja

I would hope it had more than that, with only a couple of bolt-ons on my LT1 (350). I dynoed 326rwhp before my valves got bent in the heads...

TWS

iTrader: (63)

I am not experienced with Mustang Dynos. I understand they read lower, but your numbers still seem low.

My 385 stroker put down peak torque of 468 ft-lbs at the tires on a Dynojet. It has AFR 195 heads and LT4 intake and a different cam than yours, but still your numbers seem off.

weatherkid

My heads were done by flow technologies a local race shop in MI. I think i need better flowing heads, I had them on a benchflow and they flowed 255intake and 161 exhaust at .6 lift