Conversions & Swaps LSX Engines in Non-LSX Vehicles
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

IRS solutions?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-16-2007, 03:55 PM
  #1  
SSU'S Vice Mod
Thread Starter
 
sb427f-car's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hazard Co. Maryland
Posts: 2,391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default IRS solutions?

How's hung an IRS under their hotrod or classic muscle car? I'm seriously considering going the IRS route in a 7 replica and have been doing massive amounts of reading on chassis/suspension design and theoretical fundamentals.

If you've gone the IRS route, what went into your suspension geometry, fabrication, ect? Did you fab your own control arms, uprights, ect.?

Additionally, anyone that has a good upright idea along with a way to do bearings in them, I'm very curious about that too.

Thanks!!!
Old 01-16-2007, 05:07 PM
  #2  
On The Tree
 
v8bug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If I was ever going to bo IRS in a full size hot rod, don't think I would for $ reasons, I would start looking on ebay for full corvette rolling chassis. I have seen them for under $10K with the rear end trans!

This would take all the thinking out of the equation (for the most part) You would have to make upper control arm mounts it look like, but thats no big deal. For the time and money your could sink in something else, GM has done the work for you.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/97-Co...QQcmdZViewItem

my $.02


7 replica, you talking about them little lotus things?
Old 01-16-2007, 05:18 PM
  #3  
SSU'S Vice Mod
Thread Starter
 
sb427f-car's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hazard Co. Maryland
Posts: 2,391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by v8bug
If I was ever going to bo IRS in a full size hot rod, don't think I would for $ reasons, I would start looking on ebay for full corvette rolling chassis. I have seen them for under $10K with the rear end trans!

This would take all the thinking out of the equation (for the most part) You would have to make upper control arm mounts it look like, but thats no big deal. For the time and money your could sink in something else, GM has done the work for you.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/97-Co...QQcmdZViewItem

my $.02


7 replica, you talking about them little lotus things?

Yeppers...and this isn't starting for quite a while...so the research and dreaming is half the fun. The "trans axle" has crossed my mind, but due to space constraints in these things has been ruled out. I'm probably not even going to go with anything that's already been designed (same basic space frame, but with many variations).

I really want to do my own suspension work, and there is something to be said in a car that was designed for certain weight, certain cross weight, track width, ect. That's half the problem that people run into in building these cars, that is not being able to get the geometry right for things like bump steer and ackerman steering angles.

Besides...corvette stuff is money. Quality for the money, sure, but I want to be able to have full adjustabilty and knowledge that it'll do what I want it to do... No worries though, ideas are still ideas and NOTHING is set in stone.

Last edited by sb427f-car; 01-16-2007 at 05:25 PM.
Old 01-16-2007, 05:38 PM
  #4  
Launching!
iTrader: (5)
 
Quick Double Nickel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

C4 vette, or you could do the old-school hot rod thing and go Jaguar. I don't know how strong those are though. I think there might even be an IRS-version of the Halibrand Quick-Change, but I'm not sure.
Old 01-16-2007, 05:44 PM
  #5  
SSU'S Vice Mod
Thread Starter
 
sb427f-car's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hazard Co. Maryland
Posts: 2,391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Quick Double Nickel
C4 vette, or you could do the old-school hot rod thing and go Jaguar. I don't know how strong those are though. I think there might even be an IRS-version of the Halibrand Quick-Change, but I'm not sure.
I was also thinking off the shelf center sections like Expidition, Cobra, Caddy, GTO.
Old 01-16-2007, 06:16 PM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (24)
 
digitalsolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana
Posts: 1,038
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Lots of guys use 3rd Gen (93-2002) Mazda RX7 rear subframes. Strong differentials, and dual A-Arm setup.
Old 01-16-2007, 08:35 PM
  #7  
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
jsconiers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have a 68 fire bird with a wayne due c4 IRS. It was a bracket kit that welded in place and allows you to attach a c4 dana 36 / 44. Check out the chassis from http://www.schwartzperformance.com/products.htm. For $2495 you a get a full bare frame which in my oppinion is pretty good. Adapting a c4 (even GTO style) IRS should be fairly easy. Also there is TCI who makes an IRS kit but I don't know anything them.
Old 01-17-2007, 06:59 AM
  #8  
On The Tree
 
v8bug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would look at places like this:

http://www.kitcarmag.com/

Seems they do alot of the 7 replicas. You should run an all aluminum turbo ecotec, power to weight is insane, like in their ECOCAT project car.

just some more info

as for a rear end, I dont know, I would assume lighter the better right?
Old 01-17-2007, 10:29 AM
  #9  
TECH Resident
 
superchargedbandit's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The Irs Scare Me. I Dont Want To Get Audited!
Old 01-17-2007, 12:00 PM
  #10  
SSU'S Vice Mod
Thread Starter
 
sb427f-car's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hazard Co. Maryland
Posts: 2,391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by digitalsolo
Lots of guys use 3rd Gen (93-2002) Mazda RX7 rear subframes. Strong differentials, and dual A-Arm setup.
I'll have to look into that...

Thing to consider is that I will not be using a "sub-frame" for the build. It will NOT coinside with the frame geometry in the most likely case.

v8 bug...thanks for the kit car mag thing...I guess I should really pick up a copy of that somewhere and start reading it...and yes the ecotec captured my attention for a while but I've come to the determination that I want this thing to be "right" in my mind which includes the sound, the tq, the v-8 rumble, shake, feel, ect. I'm sure that I'd have a blast with an ecotec, but I won't be 100% "happy" with my build.

jsconiers, you didn't read my post very carefully I'll be building my own frame...I just need center section, upright, and other suspension ideas...
Old 01-17-2007, 05:48 PM
  #11  
TECH Apprentice
 
99c5vert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I was looking under a caddy CTS the other day. Pretty nice looking diff in there.

RX-7s and cobra rears are tried and true.
Old 01-17-2007, 06:07 PM
  #12  
SSU'S Vice Mod
Thread Starter
 
sb427f-car's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hazard Co. Maryland
Posts: 2,391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 99c5vert
I was looking under a caddy CTS the other day. Pretty nice looking diff in there.

RX-7s and cobra rears are tried and true.
Man, both of those have crossed my mind now...along with the CTS stuff...more after dinner.
Old 01-17-2007, 06:30 PM
  #13  
SSU'S Vice Mod
Thread Starter
 
sb427f-car's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hazard Co. Maryland
Posts: 2,391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sb427f-car
Man, both of those have crossed my mind now...along with the CTS stuff...more after dinner.
The CTS-Vs have had issues with wheel hop and breaking diffs, but they'd also be 2xs the weight as anything I'd have. Not only that, but I can take the time to set up a proper suspension to stave off any sort of wheel hop problem. I don't know.
Old 01-17-2007, 06:38 PM
  #14  
TECH Apprentice
 
99c5vert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

well, the wheel hop is a matter of suspension design, not the diff itself. Often the hop is a result of busings being too soft. Also, just because there is hop issues in a 3000 lb car, doesn't mean you'll have it.

What I would love to do is have inboard brakes to go with it.
Old 01-17-2007, 06:47 PM
  #15  
Teching In
iTrader: (2)
 
ls1coupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: TX
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

look into the 03-04 cobra irs rearends
Old 01-17-2007, 07:42 PM
  #16  
SSU'S Vice Mod
Thread Starter
 
sb427f-car's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hazard Co. Maryland
Posts: 2,391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 99c5vert
well, the wheel hop is a matter of suspension design, not the diff itself. Often the hop is a result of busings being too soft. Also, just because there is hop issues in a 3000 lb car, doesn't mean you'll have it.

What I would love to do is have inboard brakes to go with it.
Problem with inboard breaks on these cars is where do you put the fuel cell? There ain't much room back there to begin with, add brakes on the inside and where is it gonna go?

I agree with the suspension design being the primary culprit of causing wheel hop. Couple it being 400 horse, 400 lb ft of tq AND stressing it with 2 tons of fun from a steady state mass to in motion, and yeah, you do the math,

LS1coupe...I know the 03-04 cobra irs rearends have been discussed on some of the 7 boards as well. So have explore / expidition rear housings. Trailblazer is IRS too now isn't it?
Old 01-17-2007, 08:12 PM
  #17  
TECH Apprentice
 
99c5vert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

On the Rotus there'd be plenty of room, but then again, It's [cough]an oversized[/cough] seven. I think it's been done in a normal sized seven.
Old 01-17-2007, 08:21 PM
  #18  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
NO-OPTION-2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by sb427f-car
Trailblazer is IRS too now isn't it?
Nope, still solid axle with coils / control arms.
Old 01-17-2007, 09:06 PM
  #19  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (6)
 
sierrac3_s2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Americus, GA
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Someone mentioned using the Ecotec engine. The CTS rearend is used in the Pontiac Solstice / Saturn Sky which is powered by either a turbo or NA Ecotec engine and the car weighs in at 2900lbs. Seems like that would be a good option for your car.
Old 01-17-2007, 09:46 PM
  #20  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Project GatTagO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The City of Fountains
Posts: 10,207
Received 1,485 Likes on 929 Posts
LS1Tech 20 Year Member
Default

If gear ratio selection is a factor, nothing will beat a diff out of a Cobra or Explorer. The housings are different but the guts are ideantical in both rears. The internals are the same as solid axle 8.8 rear ends and use 31 spline axles. There is huge aftermarket support for these rear ends with all kinds of diffs being offered along with just about any gear ratio you may need. Stock 03-04 ratio is 3.55, not sure about the Explorers.

Andrew


Quick Reply: IRS solutions?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:30 PM.