Conversions & Swaps LSX Engines in Non-LSX Vehicles
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

5.3/6.0 swap into 89 Suburban

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-16-2007, 05:05 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
89burb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 5.3/6.0 swap into 89 Suburban

Hi all, I am new here and am looking to swap either a 5.3 or a 6.0 into a Suburban. Just not sure which would be better for my application. Hoping ya'll can help me make up my mind so I can start shopping. I am looking to make this a daily driver, with occaissional towing of a 5K pound camper trailer. I would like to at least get the same mileage as the old 350/700 combo of about 15-17. So with that which would be the best option. I know the 6.0 would be fine but wonder if the 5.3 would be strong enough for the heavy Burb. Thanks!
Old 06-16-2007, 06:29 PM
  #2  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (5)
 
hpmotorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: N.E. FL
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the 5.3 will work, but the 6.0 would give you more torque, price difference between a scrapyard 5.3 to 6.0 is about a $1000,
Old 06-16-2007, 07:06 PM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
89burb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I just looked on the Chevy sales site to get the mileage for each on the new burbs. Think it would be close on the older boxier burbs?
Old 06-16-2007, 07:50 PM
  #4  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (5)
 
hpmotorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: N.E. FL
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yeah mileage should be close, they are great engines
Old 06-17-2007, 12:54 AM
  #5  
On The Tree
 
9540x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

5.3 would be adequate, but the question you gotta ask yourself is if you're willing to settle for "adequate". With the intent of pulling a trailer, I'd recomend hands down the 6.0. They make a ton of torque, they're incredibly strong (like all LSx based engines are), and should give you about 18-25 mpg with the 4l80e and some decent street gears. Sure the 5.3s are dirt cheap and make good power (i'm using one for my swap into my 3rd gen firebird as a matter of fact), but for a big truck like the 89 suburban I think the LQ9 will suit your needs much better. I think you'll be pleased with yourself later on if you shell out the extra cash now.
Old 06-19-2007, 12:12 PM
  #6  
On The Tree
 
jeepinpete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Quakertown, PA
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If your like me, an extra $1000 is not meaningless. A 5.3l is going to have quite a bit more power than your 350. And it will return better mileage than the 6.0l. If you are towing a lot (50% of the time), then I would consider the 6.0l. Otherwise, the 5.3 will get the job done...
Old 06-19-2007, 12:33 PM
  #7  
On The Tree
 
9540x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

IMHO I think that you should save until you can get what you really want. Even if it means that you can't start the swap until 6 months from now. There's lots of preliminary work to be done before the engine goes in such tracking down or making your own engine mounts, transmission cross member, new driveshaft, perhaps better rear end and gears, etc. They're all serious concerns and have to be done eventually so you might as well do it while your saving up for the engine. But, that being said, if you want the 5.3 than go for the 5.3. Also, the MPG difference between the 5.3 and the 6.0 isn't that significant. I think that the 5.3 gets an average of 25-28 with a T56. the 6.0 will probably get about 22-24 with a 4l80e depending on your driving style



Quick Reply: 5.3/6.0 swap into 89 Suburban



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:48 PM.