Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

i have guys telling me not to run c16. need some experience here

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-01-2007, 04:15 PM
  #1  
single digit dreamer
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
parish8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: omaha ne
Posts: 9,757
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default i have guys telling me not to run c16. need some experience here

i need to tune the truck without meth using pump gas and a vp fuel of some kind. localy i can get c16 and have always thought that was the best fuel out there.

the set up on race fuel is 408, afr heads, twin gts 70's, decent air to water intercooler. going to push it to 20psi or so and over 1000rwhp on a dynojet.

here are some quotes i am geting. is this the consensus? should i go with c12 even though it is just 108 octane?

""""don't run C16 in a turbo car with an intercooler, period.


you'll lose a shitload of power. Trust me, I've tried it a lot out here. You should be running something like C12 or 114 for your combo. The C16 requires super hot IAT's like blown454 says - it's meant specifically for roots-blown engines that run 200 degree F and higher intake air temps. And it slows them down too.

A lot of import "racers" and other people will try to tell you otherwise, but hours of dyno testing has shown me it's not meant for the kind of combo you are running. """"
Old 08-01-2007, 04:19 PM
  #2  
Teching In
 
SSinisterSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

There have been times where i have seen cars make less power on too high of octane. but with 20psi you may or may not need it. it really just depends on how good your w/a intercooler really is. If it does keep you IAT's low then i would stay with the 112 or 114 tops.
Old 08-01-2007, 04:24 PM
  #3  
FormerVendor
 
Street Tuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Any tuner that has any ability at all is going to make loads more power on C16 than pump gas in any turbocharged application....disagreeing with this one is out there with the urban myths that 'Speed Density tuning doesnt work if you live in a high altitude'.

If a tuning shop tells you either of those, the solution is simple....take your money and run far, far away
Old 08-01-2007, 04:24 PM
  #4  
single digit dreamer
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
parish8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: omaha ne
Posts: 9,757
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

something to remember c12 is only 108 octane.
Old 08-01-2007, 04:27 PM
  #5  
single digit dreamer
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
parish8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: omaha ne
Posts: 9,757
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Street Tuna
Any tuner that has any ability at all is going to make loads more power on C16 than pump gas in any turbocharged application....disagreeing with this one is out there with the urban myths that 'Speed Density tuning doesnt work if you live in a high altitude'.

If a tuning shop tells you either of those, the solution is simple....take your money and run far, far away
not comparing c16 to pump gas. comparing it to other vp race fuels. will c16 be down on power compared to c12(only 108 octane). other important question is do i need a better fuel than c12 to run what i want to run(~1000-1100rwhp). i want to be on the "very safe side"
Old 08-01-2007, 04:28 PM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
 
mahhddgtp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Loganville, GA
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Street Tuna
Any tuner that has any ability at all is going to make loads more power on C16 than pump gas.
He's basically asking C16 vs C12 (not pump)
Old 08-01-2007, 04:36 PM
  #7  
FormerVendor
 
Street Tuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by parish8
""""don't run C16 in a turbo car with an intercooler, period.
""""
This was the bit that caught my eye
Old 08-01-2007, 05:17 PM
  #8  
TS6
10 Second Club
iTrader: (41)
 
TS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Champaign Il
Posts: 2,989
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Turbo guys have been running C16 for years. Whoever says you shouldn't run it on a turbo car period needs removed from the gene pool.
Old 08-01-2007, 05:50 PM
  #9  
Coal Mining Director
iTrader: (17)
 
onfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 4,442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Sunoco tech told me to try the 110 leaded first. It's heavier than C16 and has less lead to kill the wideband.
Old 08-01-2007, 05:53 PM
  #10  
Coal Mining Director
iTrader: (17)
 
onfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 4,442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Property
Standard
Leaded
Supreme
Leaded
MO2X
HCR Plus
Maximal Leaded


More Information
More Information
More Information
More Information
More Information

Specific Gravity
0.728
0.715
0.717
0.739
0.708

Antiknock Index (R+M)/2
110
112
112
114
116

RON, Research Octane
115
114
115
118
118

MON, Motor Octane
105
110
109
110
114

Reid Vapor Pressure
5.6
6.3
9.8
6.0
5.9

Distillation, ºF






Initial Boiling Point
100
98
92
102
103

10% Evaporation
179
170
122
181
170

50% Evaporation
222
219
208
217
217

90% Evaporation
248
232
229
226
232

Final Boiling Point
369
257
251
245
257

Leaded
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes

Color
Purple
Blue
Green
Orange
Red

Oxygen, Wt.%
0.0%
0.0%
2.7%
0.0%
0.0%

Dielectric Constant
-0.1
-0.7
6.9
0.6
-0.9
Old 08-01-2007, 06:13 PM
  #11  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (4)
 
Ed @ Late Model Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

@ Onfire!!! more info than you ever wanted to know about fuel!

Ed
Old 08-01-2007, 06:59 PM
  #12  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (77)
 
black98ws6ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: louisville,ky
Posts: 2,107
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by parish8
i want to be on the "very safe side"
That right there answers your own question....you MAY NOT need c16 for the octane alone.....and it may make less power compared a lower octane......... BUT WITH LESS OF A SAFETY MARGIN.
Old 08-01-2007, 07:13 PM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (21)
 
NA$TY-TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 10,333
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by black98ws6ta
That right there answers your own question....you MAY NOT need c16 for the octane alone.....and it may make less power compared a lower octane......... BUT WITH LESS OF A SAFETY MARGIN.

I agree.....

Ive been running Torco latley and i run the 118 octain stuff..... might not need it over the 116 but id rather be safe then sorry....

KP would have some good insight on this since i know he runs less then c16..... if im not mistaken i believe he runs 110..... no meth either...

Kyle
Old 08-01-2007, 08:20 PM
  #14  
LS1Tech Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Slowhawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bridgewater,Ma
Posts: 14,865
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

C-16 is not better than the lower grades for boost?
****,I better switch out the gas in our race cars that run 11-1 comp. and 26lbs of boost

just messing with ya. C-16 works very well and we use int in alot of cars with very good results.
Old 08-01-2007, 11:18 PM
  #15  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
BLWN1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,874
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

I can get a VP reps number if you want to drill him.. Hes a good guy, with a fast car....
Old 08-02-2007, 01:41 AM
  #16  
TECH Addict
 
chuntington101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,866
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

C-16 is a good fuel, but form what i have heard, this new VP import race fuel is the nuts! think the octane is over 120! also they recon it will make 5% more power than any other nonoxygenatted fuel.

thanks Chris.
Old 08-02-2007, 09:51 AM
  #17  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (34)
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 44,660
Received 1,103 Likes on 723 Posts

Default

VI Import costs more too right, $11 vs. $9?
Old 08-02-2007, 10:53 AM
  #18  
Banned
iTrader: (7)
 
Quik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Pittsburgh!!!!!!!! Pa
Posts: 4,893
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i thought you already made 1011rwhp/1080rwtq?
Old 08-02-2007, 11:02 AM
  #19  
single digit dreamer
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
parish8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: omaha ne
Posts: 9,757
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Quik
i thought you already made 1011rwhp/1080rwtq?
it made 1055rwhp and something like 1100tq on some cheap philips 114.

it is a long story but i need to tune it with a vp fuel and make is as absolutly safe as i can.

most people i am talking to say it will be down on power with the c16 but i have a ton of turbo. wont i be able to toss an extra psi or so at it and be right where i was but probably still be safer because the c16 is kick *** stuff?
Old 08-02-2007, 11:03 AM
  #20  
8 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
Ponyhntr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Lee's Summit, MO (KC)
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

All of our Drag Radial, SSO, and Pro racers run C16. They all see less than 80* of IAT, have approximately 9:1 compression, and all run 25+ (some up to 50) psi of boost. These cars run 8-teens all the way to mid 6's.

You'll be fine with C16.


Quick Reply: i have guys telling me not to run c16. need some experience here



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:20 PM.